Eurotic TV - General Discussion

Yasmine1 wrote:And yes you are right having more info just by talking to a model for example will not mean that this is right or wrong.

And again this is why you are one of the blind people and will always be.

dazaman wrote:So by your logic Yasmine1 anybody with a different view to yours is wrong or if proven right they work for ETV? correct me if i am wrong on that and having more info than another person does not mean anything.

Please read carefully what I have written this is not what I have said in summary :
Each one can have is own ideas and can post them but please don't say you are flawed/dreaming/stupid (or other words of the same nature) on something no one, me you or others have any idea about as we are all viewers/spectators in a game called eUrotic.TV. I have added, if you were working there and you have information about things which are not visible on camera I'll assume then once it was written here its an official statement of ETV. And yes you are right having more info just by talking to a model for example will not mean that this is right or wrong.

Yasmine1 wrote:

Mr_Niceguy wrote:So not only do you sound like a broken record but also your argument is flawed. Anyway there is a perfectly good thread for this argument, but in it there doesn't seem to be a post from you.

At first I had the impression it was mostly policy, but it doesn't make sense to show one girl explicitly naked and not the other. This is most likely the models choice.

Listen if I am not wrong this is not your first time with this sort of comments ! I said it in the past and I said it again as long as someone here will identify himself as the official ETV spokesman (which apparently no one did) my post is flawed as much as yours !! I have no issue with you if you will state your point of view but don't overrule other ideas you have the same information I have and your are entitled to your thoughts and ideas fine ! so post that you don't agree but please dont state that your are better than others as if you have any inside information. Believe me I am following ETV form day 1 and to my point of view this behavior of ETV now days has nothing to do with models wishes and I am not speaking about soft models neither about girls like Spirit or Gia but on girls that in the past or better in the near past used to be much more daring than today so if this happens to one model okay maybe she has a problem with her grandma but it can't happen to all models !! Claudia , Carmen, Calomira , Kally , Mashiara, Jaquelin, and more that are now tamed down and whenever they do something the camera moves away just an example one of many in which Scarlet was removing her slip then looked to the direction of probably the director and the slip was on again ... So you can believe in what you want and state it but please don't tell me I am wrong unless as stated before you are an ETV employee !

So by your logic Yasmine1 anybody with a different view to yours is wrong or if proven right they work for ETV? correct me if i am wrong on that and having more info than another person does not mean anything.

Mr_Niceguy wrote:So not only do you sound like a broken record but also your argument is flawed. Anyway there is a perfectly good thread for this argument, but in it there doesn't seem to be a post from you.

At first I had the impression it was mostly policy, but it doesn't make sense to show one girl explicitly naked and not the other. This is most likely the models choice.

Listen if I am not wrong this is not your first time with this sort of comments ! I said it in the past and I said it again as long as someone here will identify himself as the official ETV spokesman (which apparently no one did) my post is flawed as much as yours !! I have no issue with you if you will state your point of view but don't overrule other ideas you have the same information I have and your are entitled to your thoughts and ideas fine ! so post that you don't agree but please dont state that your are better than others as if you have any inside information. Believe me I am following ETV form day 1 and to my point of view this behavior of ETV now days has nothing to do with models wishes and I am not speaking about soft models neither about girls like Spirit or Gia but on girls that in the past or better in the near past used to be much more daring than today so if this happens to one model okay maybe she has a problem with her grandma but it can't happen to all models !! Claudia , Carmen, Calomira , Kally , Mashiara, Jaquelin, and more that are now tamed down and whenever they do something the camera moves away just an example one of many in which Scarlet was removing her slip then looked to the direction of probably the director and the slip was on again ... So you can believe in what you want and state it but please don't tell me I am wrong unless as stated before you are an ETV employee !

Obviously ETV shows fills a market niche....teasing and several fetish erotic... and if therefor is great demand, why should ETV change its policy ? So we can accept it and enjoy, or condemn it and bother us. The only indicator for ETV is the financial success.
This kind of show depends also on the number and talent of the models and this is in my mind the main trump of ETV.

if we conclude from one on the others we may find another reason for models not wanting to do on etv, even though the may have no problems with nudity in general, right here in the forum: the videos ...
etv is just on tv and then gone.
The videos in the net stay for years ... and are less controlable.

Yasmine1 wrote:I am sorry for sounding like a broken record but these are not the directors/cameraman fault its what ETV wants believe they know their job if they were allowed .....

If you remember you also said this about Inez, but actually Inez probably didn't want to make a more explicit show anymore because she was nearing the end of her ETV experience. There can be many reasons. Maybe a model has no problems getting naked, but really doesn't like to be on camera explicitly, after being caught of guard a few times she may decide to be more carefull. Maybe somebody's favorite grandmother died who asked in her will her granddaugter not to show her pussy any more, really it could be anything.

So not only do you sound like a broken record but also your argument is flawed. Anyway there is a perfectly good thread for this argument, but in it there doesn't seem to be a post from you.

[Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig]

At first I had the impression it was mostly policy, but it doesn't make sense to show one girl explicitly naked and not the other. This is most likely the models choice.

Tarl_Cabot wrote:

luca82 wrote:...This isn't a boycott against a model, it's only the direction's strategy for the which if a girl begin to be hot in comparison to her usually level, there will be a camera change to leave in the viewers the wish to do other requests...

or just an agreement between director and the model who is teasing but doesn't want to show more.

The "she wants to show more"-idea is probably just in your fantasy.

(about the softer models who don't show everything, not about the hot models who are sometimes restricted by the directors)

My post isn't refered to an eventual show (like you say 'she wants to show more'); my post it's only a reference at the moment soon before of the camera change; the moment in which the show of the nudity, in comparison to the level of the model, is already started ('she is showing'): nipple for Gia, pussy for Calomira...but after one second...camera change with this result: the vision of one oops.

Therefore I have made reference to this and no to an eventual idea 'She wants to show more' or, at least in this case it woud better write, 'she wants to show for more time'.
After all my post is been only an answer at the post of Kike50 in which the pricipal subject wasn't the choice of the model, but instead the boycott against her by the part of the director.
I have only made a comment about the fact that if we speak of boycott, we can't speak of it only in reference to one model....

A part this we can even speak about the personal choices of the models (teasing or no teasing, soft or hot), but repeat, the subject of the post of Kike50 was another.

I am sorry for sounding like a broken record but this is not the directors/cameraman fault its what ETV wants believe they know their job if they were allowed ....

Michael_N wrote:There's impression that the directors of ETV compete who of them worse. I mean, the camera immediately moves away as soon as something interesting starts, and returned when to watch already nothing.I doubt that this style of direction will bring them more money.

Michael, I totally support your opinion. Too seldom there is real erotic (e.g. licking) action. And if something like that seems to develop, the camera turns away in that very moment.
Only if the girls have "an external reason" to lick (cream or honey) we have a chance that this is shown.

In German free TV are more erotic nightshows than here.
Only "disadvantage": you cannot influence them, it's all movie.

jonas wrote:After many experiences with bad camera work I must say:
The problem are not only the directors, the greatest problem are the camera men, specific camera men. Some of them believe that they can play god, especially if they feel attacked by viewers.
Some years ago I criticised a camera man named ANTONIO ("TONIO") because of bad camera work (in a VIPsms). Since this time he always tried to destroy the shows I wished from a model, last time yesterday in the afternoon show. Normally in that daytime show the camera work is good, the camera shows the wished actions without switching off to other models - so yesterday too. But when Carmen danced for ME, the camera switched off for nearly half of her dance to other models doing nothing. I heard that the (only!) camera man was Antonio. So I stopped talking with Carmen (like I usually do for a longer time during and after her dance).
Mr. Ressel will be "happy" about the behaviour of such a camera man!

And the most teasing and stupidity that the director does not do something about it if there is director. and

There are no supervisors at the performance of the shows if succeeded or failed. Or if the caller is satisfied or

not. The important thing for them is learn how to make cinema movies .

Tarl_Cabot wrote:or just an agreement between director and the model who is teasing but doesn't want to show more.

The "she wants to show more"-idea is probably just in your fantasy.

(about the softer models who don't show everything, not about the hot models who are sometimes restricted by the directors)

Well in most of the night shows this may only apply to Gia and also about her I am not so sure (see some of her after hour shows) the others fall in your other category which are 83% of the models during the week

Michael_N wrote:There's impression that the directors of ETV compete who of them worse. I mean, the camera immediately moves away as soon as something interesting starts, and returned when to watch already nothing.I doubt that this style of direction will bring them more money.

You get to the point : do the make money?
If the answer is Yes, we do not have to worry. We will continue to be upset or happy, it depend on what they will broadcast.
If the answer is No, in that case we should be very worried because they could leave us without our amusement. Amen

Michael_N wrote:There's impression that the directors of ETV compete who of them worse. I mean, the camera immediately moves away as soon as something interesting starts, and returned when to watch already nothing.I doubt that this style of direction will bring them more money.

If it makes the wanker stay longer on the phone because he's not yet there where he wants to be they make more money this way.

There's impression that the directors of ETV compete who of them worse. I mean, the camera immediately moves away as soon as something interesting starts, and returned when to watch already nothing.I doubt that this style of direction will bring them more money.