Eurotic's website & webstream

brokingbull wrote:11:35 pm
A pretty model (Lauren) but pretty much pixellation

conclusion:

unwatchable, annoying crap

You make a great point about the pixelated webstream, take a look at this image to see how blocky Lauren looked:

[Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig]

Enjoy???

11:35 pm
A pretty model (Lauren) but pretty much pixellation

conclusion:

unwatchable, annoying crap

Dear Kenny, if it is real, it means ETV is able to perform better lights and angles. And, by the way, better models, better studios, credible interaction .... And then, all current bullshit is a their free choice ...
ETV, the suicide broadcast ...

Just had a quick look at the channel there, looks like same old shite, different night, who gives a flying fuck about studio lighting and camera angles anyway when there is fuck all of anything that is remotely erotic to see

shagshaggy wrote:seduction club =rip off club if its anything like last weeks.

well so far, and 50mins into a 5hr show is maybe still in warmup time, but:
lighting seems better, angles are better, haven't seen a long view yet, and levels seem higher than normal
but
everyone has their own thoughts on levels and what keeps them happy, I am only commenting on my own thoughts
its still early, so the show could improve even more, or stay the same, or go downhill.
we will have to wait and see.

seduction club =rip off club if its anything like last weeks.

imaginator55 wrote:

xmsx80 wrote:Obviously there exist some factors which allow them to not caring about a stable web stream with an acceptable image quality (for several years).

Two factors which should make it easier for them to produce reasonable video quality are the extensive use of the black studio and (nearly) static cams. All parts of the view that are black and do not change much over time can be encoded very efficiently and transported with a low data rate - simply because there is almost nothing to encode (this is also the case when the background is bright white). If you combine this with a camera shot from a large distance, you could get quite decent video without pixellation with a bandwidth of less than 1000. But it seems that even with these tricks ETV cannot get it right all the time. Pixellation gets really annoying when there are many moving details in the view (such as water drops from the shower or when a hand held cam is pointed at a grating).

good points. although I'm not keen on the black studio, it makes a lot more sense now, and I can live with it, if it means better video quality, they just need to stop the long range shots though

New views of roshana........

brokingbull wrote:

TazDevil wrote:In an attempt to get this Thread back on Topic, to discuss the ETV Webstream:

They do need to improve the picture quality, the stream suffered from pixilation at times, I had 1,500 kbps, so the issue appears to be something they should be able to fix, rather than my connectivity or equipment.

Did anyone else watch and enjoy the show?

Now we are 2!

Now 3

Yes, I watched the shows and it was most impressive. The video quality started quite bad but improved after about an hour, and then was quite good overall. Not as good as the video quality on Wednesday, but the quality does seem to be better for both studios when both are in use, as opposed to the shared studio nights, which, for some reason, usually have a mix of good and bad camera feeds. It's as of some of the camera need upgrading/replaced and some are quite new and more capable.

as for the levels in use, these were surprisingly very good (and hot) and really enjoyed. We even had new views that I haven't seen before , from Izzy and Roshana, and it was most impressive.

As has been said, this was one good show, so we should be cautious, but hopeful for a new direction from ETV.

Here's hoping that it the start of something good.

Some people like web streaming while some people like large tv screen......some people like camping sites while some people like five stars hotels

TazDevil,obviously no one , Enjoy `?? are you serious ??

xmsx80 wrote:Obviously there exist some factors which allow them to not caring about a stable web stream with an acceptable image quality (for several years).

Two factors which should make it easier for them to produce reasonable video quality are the extensive use of the black studio and (nearly) static cams. All parts of the view that are black and do not change much over time can be encoded very efficiently and transported with a low data rate - simply because there is almost nothing to encode (this is also the case when the background is bright white). If you combine this with a camera shot from a large distance, you could get quite decent video without pixellation with a bandwidth of less than 1000. But it seems that even with these tricks ETV cannot get it right all the time. Pixellation gets really annoying when there are many moving details in the view (such as water drops from the shower or when a hand held cam is pointed at a grating).

xmsx80 wrote:Obviously there exist some factors which allow them to not caring about a stable web stream with an acceptable image quality (for several years).

ETV uses [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig]

Obviously there exist some factors which allow them to not caring about a stable web stream with an acceptable image quality (for several years).

TazDevil wrote:In an attempt to get this Thread back on Topic, to discuss the ETV Webstream:

They do need to improve the picture quality, the stream suffered from pixilation at times, I had 1,500 kbps, so the issue appears to be something they should be able to fix, rather than my connectivity or equipment.

Did anyone else watch and enjoy the show?

Now we are 2!