| Autor | Beiträge |
|---|---|
|
|
JohnGuitar wrote:...Hi John, she's really not the type of girl I prefer, so what I don't need to see at all is her body. But she has a really beautiful face and she radiates happiness which often also infects other girls in the studio, therefor I like her having in a night show anyway. And IMHO who still spends money on requesting her a full strip shouldn't be too disappointed it won't be fulfilled. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
lazaridis wrote:Well, many forumers tend to forget that a model's body belongs to HER and to nobody else... also many forumers tend to forget that always soft or warm models have been in the night shows and that these models have fans, too. |
|
|
|
|
I am a big fan of Anna and I am also happy to see those big boobs of hers oiled or not. But a model does not have to get naked and show everything to be sexy or erotic. Most of us in the forum long for the 'good old days' to return with it's explicit camera views and intimate interaction between the girls. But looking back at many hot moments from that era and you will find a lot of the best scenes involved models who kept their pants ON. They used to show great open leg shots but the models had small pants on. They seem unsure to do this these days even though you see nothing that should not be shown. Kaleya was the queen of tease and used to drop ice cubes down her pants or rub the front of them. She would allow oil to run down her body and into her pants--she would pull her pants up tight between her legs as well. All this and not showing her pussy all the time transformed her into one of Eurotics best models. My point is-that you don't have to 'show' to be sexy and sometimes I prefer this to models standing facing a camera with pants at their knees. I wish more models would follow Kaleyas style.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Italianfan wrote:I don't agree with you John, because every girl has the right to decide what Well, many forumers tend to forget that a model's body belongs to HER and to nobody else... |
|
|
|
|
|
JohnGuitar wrote:Anna is with ETV more than two years and we have never seen I don't agree with you John, because every girl has the right to decide what to show or not of her body;personally I'm happy to see her fantastic boobs and her lovely smile and I don't really need to see anything else of her body. There are other girls who have to change their attitude in the studio and with the viewers, surely Anna isn't one of them. Regards, Italianfan |
|
|
|
|
Anna is with ETV more than two years and we have never seen
her naked, not only that, but she use to decline every request in that matter. Now, this week she is in the schedule four times out of seven night shows without any tangible progress toward erotic shows. It's pity really and shameful for her not to fulfil the willing of who spend some money on SMS dreaming to see Anna naked. Please Anna take the helm and go or change your attitude in front of the camera.   JohnGuitar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
aren't these the two biggest arguments to watch etv...?!?
|
|
|
|
sadnesseyes wrote:i think this is the time for pussy show anna My friend what a sadness assertion, it's too late for Anna to expose or uncover her genital. You supposed to ask her before she rode on the bus together with Brona. She will be on board with Brona till the bus breaks down. JohnGuitar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
i think this is the time for pussy show anna
|
|
|
|
|
|
one of my absolute favourite models. damn sexy in that black dress!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chris26 wrote:max76 wrote:When Anna removes panties? 
|
|
|
|
max76 wrote:When Anna removes panties? When she takes showers at home, I guess? |
|
|
|
|
|
When Anna removes panties?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
also in the nightshow
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just say what you want but ANNA has some reaaalllllyyyy nice bells!!!
|
|
|
