| Autor | Beiträge |
|---|---|
|
|
Post: #72 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 20.07.2010, 19:03 20.07.2010, 19:01 Re: The girls page votes (and voters)
The problem is not who is the first girl in the ranking.
And the problem is not if you like a certain kind of girls rather than other kinds. The problem is to vote according to common sense. I make you a simple example, so that you can understand the problem: I like model A, I appreciate her beauty and elegance, and I like model B. But model B offers everytime her best, in every show and for all shift long, while model A offers what she wants when she wants. There is also a 3rd cathegory: these models can do their best, but it will be always nothing good. Anyway this is another problem, because they have not the right features (physical aspect, elegance,...) for being in a channel like this. Now, what does 'voting using common sense' mean ? Reading many posts I've noticed that several members 'give the usual 5 stars' everyday to their 'loved girls', indipendently from what they perform. This is not using 'common sense'. |
|
|
|
|
|
I believe that by the date of this review, the main problem is that Gia is the first in the list no?.
is so hard to understand that for many people, eroticism is something more to be midnight with panties on his knees? Greetings to everyone. |
|
|
|
|
|
Why i have to vote for Angelina,Tia,Inez,Amy if i don't like this kind of girls? Sorry but i prefer more classy shows, so i like girls like Evah,Brona,Kleopatra.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #69 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 20.07.2010, 16:00 20.07.2010, 15:59 Re: The girls page votes (and voters)vappiano68 wrote:Pretty easy: the girls who offered us some good shows during 2010, who spent a lot of energy in every nightshow and even in the promotion of the ppv service (Amy, Angelina,...), girls who spent almost all their weekends in the studio (Amy, Sabrina, Viviana...), girls who put their beautiful aspect together with their hot performances (Amy, Sabrina, Alexis, Tia, Inez, Angelina, ...) are not rightly rewarded by their actual ranking. True. I should also be blamed for this. I was never interested in voting ... always have the notion that a group dominates the voting.. I always thought ( may or may not be true) that if one individual has multiple user account and has proxy account, he can vote for a particular model many times. Hence I was not interested in voting.... but most of the time , it is not going to change the result as I am/was generous in rewarding models who perform HOT. |
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #68 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 20.07.2010, 14:02 20.07.2010, 13:58 Re: The girls page votes (and voters)
I well know about Gia and her tease & denial, but people not interested at ranking (like me for example) couldn't be forced at it.
On the other side, for people interested, less votes (just 4 in a month instead of 30) would mean less contacts for the site and less attractiveness for advertising. Sure you still want this site for free, right? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
outside wrote:We cannot force members voting if they aren't interested at ranking. Yes, right, but it's a method we can use to obtain the same weight for every member. Only some minutes spent for voting in exchange for tons of videos. Not so bad. Try to give a look at some posts in Gia's discussion thread: it's clear that there is something irrational ... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #66 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 20.07.2010, 13:28 20.07.2010, 13:18 Re: The girls page votes (and voters)
I think each of us our favorite model, and so it is always the first place.
Had once written that this ranking reflects the popularity of the model rather than its involvement in the show. If it was vice versa Lilian (for example) had to be in the top three |
|
|
|
|
|
We cannot force members voting if they aren't interested at ranking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dear members, I appeal to your common sense because this morning I noticed something strange in the girls' ranking.
What is so strange ? Pretty easy: the girls who offered us some good shows during 2010, who spent a lot of energy in every nightshow and even in the promotion of the ppv service (Amy, Angelina,...), girls who spent almost all their weekends in the studio (Amy, Sabrina, Viviana...), girls who put their beautiful aspect together with their hot performances (Amy, Sabrina, Alexis, Tia, Inez, Angelina, ...) are not rightly rewarded by their actual ranking. I'm not a 'crazy-lover', I'm just a fan of a good and entertaining show, so I have no interest in seeing model A or B to be at first place, I just want to see that girls' efforts are rewarded in a proper way. So my suggestion: let's vote using our common sense and my proposal: members can download the videos only if they vote 4 times every month, not more, not less than 4 times. Every month they can download videos only if they respected this rule during the previous month. |
|
|
|
|
|
Tarl_Cabot wrote:universal wrote:Amy=Scarlet in the ranking page I had forgotten it, that there! I always lose with this play there. |
|
|
|
|
|
universal wrote:Amy=Scarlet in the ranking page she lost 510 points with midnight reset and is back to 4490. |
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #61 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 04.07.2010, 01:45 04.07.2010, 01:44 Re: The girls page votes (and voters)
Amy=Scarlet in the ranking page
5000 vote = 10000 vote of Scarlet |
|
|
|
|
|
I find that it would be interesting to add in the profile of the models their date of arrival to ETV. That would make it possible to realize of the seniority of each one, we are not all of the viewers of the first hour.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DVD wrote:I know Gia is down by about 200 point. When I last looked she had at least 4700 points and Amy's must of gone down as well because I was wondering how was going to make 5000 points first. as often said and writen in the past: the votes on the models page are the votes of the last 14 days. so at one point of the night the models loose their points of the 14. day ago and start collecting the points of the new day. this happens at 02:00 cest. so Amy looses in this moment in average 1/14 of her points. she was nearly at 5.000 points and lost one day what would mean that she lost in average 350 points. so she was down on 4.700 points. btw: just Scarlet reached the 10.000 or nowadays 5.000 points on the models page. |
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #58 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 26.06.2010, 12:42 26.06.2010, 12:42 Re: The girls page votes (and voters)the-muppet wrote:DVD wrote:What's happened on the models voting? last night I voted, and this morning the points have gone down. No mate the votes were actually on the screen and now there gone |
|
|
