| Autor | Beiträge |
|---|---|
|
Yeah the 2 for 1's are shite and have been for ages.
Still have a recording of Kandi & Hazel from their RLC days where the cameraman was forced to move the camera away because Kandi was touching Hazel's boobs with her feet. Like really??????? LOL. I'm assuming this is more due to OFCOM but still, sucks. As for the actual 2 for 1 performances, I don't bother with them. Promotes less movement from either girl to be honest lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seeing that there is fuck all anything else of interest on this forum at the moment I happen to find your post mrmann rather entertaining
 I know its pretty far fetched and its almost an advert for the shows to see so much innuendo coming from you but hey fuck it until something else more entertaining comes along than I can raise a chuckle or 2 reading your opinions. I never seen any of the shows last night so I can only judge it on the caps and videos I have viewed so far and all I have to say is meh.........sleeping was definitely the better option for me. Yeah your comment with regards to Tori, I'm not too sure I agree with you on that one but I'll let you off based on your skill to entertain I was looking back at the 2 for 1's from the 2010 and 2011 era across the boards. One of them had 2 naked women in the bath tub feeling each other up. Now I look at the 2 for 1 uploads now. Sorry to piss of the parade of these uploads but they aren't 2 for 1 shows. It's just 2 models sharing the same set with about as much chemistry that one would expect from 2 strangers sitting next to each other on a bus. PS - Completely unrelated but I had my brother coming over to my house earlier on and I knew in advance that he wanted to use my laptop. I very swiftly created another user for him so that he had no idea on all the good shit I have on my main account such as my massive collection of recorded live porn shows which I am sure he would have loved too!
|
|
|
|
|
My view is always controversial but I stand by it. I think there are two main things that allow certain women leniency, call stats and whether or not they are fooling around with the producers.
Caty is with a man now, but Hannah??? Hannah has always let Afroman feel her up in the past, as has some of the other women who have had leniency before like Clare, Adele, Lola, some of the porn stars etc. I also believe there's a tiny exception being that sometimes the producers are slightly drunk and not paying attention to certain women on screen, or they are elsewhere and don't always have time to cut to the logo or actually film some of them. The odd one is Tori, because I don't believe she's married or with someone, and she's been mentioned as being an escort as well, and yet the producers are always taming her sessions. Maybe she's not getting the calls or she's not as randy as others. |
|
|
|
|
|
Eh, I enjoy Hannah's shows personally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some very good points raised there dirk, however the models you have mentioned I personally take nothing from their shows. The worst performers are easily Caty cole, Jennifer Jade and Hannah Martin. Even the woeful Lucy Zara is better than all 3 of them put together. Caty Cole has been doing the exact same stale routine from the moment she reappeared on the night shows to the point that now when she is on I am beginning to wonder if she is actually live or its just a loop of a previous nights airing. Studio66 in recent weeks has hit new lows that I didn't even think was possible which is why I currently rank it as the worst current show on our so called beloved babe channels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The double-standards applied on the channel has long passed any element of understanding.
Last night Caty was logo-cut a few times and yet Hannah was allowed to do and show way more, with only a single logo-cut. In making this statement, I've discounted the web-only segments done with Hannah, as clearly that's not an apples-vs-apples comparison. I don't understand this outside perhaps different producers managing different performers. But it irks me. And I don't like it when I'm irked  In her last session, Hannah was allowed to wear pink lace panties which were clearly partially see-through, and no hint of a logo-cut. Great I hear you all cry. Caty had one of her usual mini-thongs on, and yet when this briefly started to give us a glimpse of landing strip (not anything further down mind you), the logo-cut comes crashing down. I'm sure it's actually very difficult to produce these sorts of live shows. The various performers do things in different ways, and I guess the producers get a sixth sense once they get familiar with the specific performers they are covering. Like all things, it improves over time and with experience. If we assume producers are aligned to performers, which would make sense, then these sorts of double-standards shouldn't exist. Either let them all do what they let Hannah do, for example, or what's the point? I'm less irked having ranted a bit. But I need to go and lie down in a dark room and try to think happy thoughts . . . that is until tonight when I'm sure something else with make the blood pressure boil. |
|
|
|
|
What is this "backstage" thing all about? I see a box of someone on a bed doing exactly the same as what's done front fucking stage. I guess you have to pay for whatever it is. But I won't be paying for fuck all from you. Never have, never will......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They are professionals to ruin the shows.
  It was easy to go to Babestation (HD)Streams after seeing they ruined the streams with this fucking box. I hope that S66Gallery doesnt blame to OFCOM of this crap. Well. it is another example that they prioritize the Cam shows to the Tvshows. Sad |
|
|
|
|
It's disappointing to stick around all week to see the Marvelous Rebecca Kelly on the nightly schedule guide for today and when the day arrives, have to watch Ella Jolie, preppy as always. Does the S66 have direction?
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's disappointing to book all week to see the Marvelous Rebecca Kelly on the nightly schedule guide for Ohoje and when the day arrives, have to watch Ella Jolie, preppy as always. Does the S66 have direction?
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's always been the case with backchannel babes, some of them get into the hard-core side of this business. But after following a link taking me to see one of my favourites. I have to say "Fuck me", I was shocked. That site was called "Public Disgrace". And the model in question, Stella Cox. I'd always been aware she did the hard stuff. But what I saw from that site she's pushing it to the limits. Pissed on, Fisted, beaten with a cane till her body is covered in ugly sore looking red wealds. And that was only the fucking trailer.
I was shocked and disturbed that such a well spoken, well educated girl, could allow herself to be part of such a world that is driven by depraved fucking nutters as these people obviously are. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
sorearse or whatever you call yourself you say you're done but you visited today? checking up on us? sent over by the poodle? what would that make you a pekinise? Just having a bit of time off from your banning duties there? remember every time someone is banned there it reveals a little more about the motives of that forum. I mean you've got to love the inconsistencies haven't you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ah well.........with or without the the lolly pop her show still sucked - Pardon the pun
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lolly pop = Logo time
Pathetic
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can understand now why Elite changed its name to Studio66 because Elite these women most certainly aren't. Aye Lucy Zara pinching her nipples is not a sight I like to see especially if I happen to be eating at the time. It's enough to give you the boke!
|
|
|
