Eurotic TV - General Discussion

imthe1 wrote:

Legxpert wrote:

brudgon wrote:but ten models on the screen for me is too much

for me too, sometimes I'm pissed that I'm not an octopus.

Oh for god sake havnt u enough legs on you Legxpert

I think the right number for all show (daytime and night) is from 4 to 6 models . More models cause many changes of images by cameraman and regie and all request from people are not fully satisfied .

Legxpert wrote:

brudgon wrote:but ten models on the screen for me is too much

for me too, sometimes I'm pissed that I'm not an octopus.

Oh for god sake havnt u enough legs on you Legxpert

Hi vappiano68 hi there -- how. Are you doing-- well I hope. No the post was not meant for you but a general comment on how I see the forum going these days. No harm intended to you at all my friend.

glassy wrote:Why is it when Eurotic are producing poor shows the forum is full of vindictave remarks about other forum members which result in ping pong posts throwing abuse to each other. Jeeeezzzuus c'mon guys its all about a channel that doesn't give a shit about how it treats its callers or sms senders. It's free so just enjoy the best shows. The forum is for expressing views about the channel-- not each other. Cool it.

Hi Glassy!
Nice to read your always wise words !
I just hope you don't refer to my previous post, as it wasn't absolutely meant to be an attack,
just a different but respectful point of view.

Cheers

Why is it when Eurotic are producing poor shows the forum is full of vindictave remarks about other forum members which result in ping pong posts throwing abuse to each other. Jeeeezzzuus c'mon guys its all about a channel that doesn't give a shit about how it treats its callers or sms senders. It's free so just enjoy the best shows. The forum is for expressing views about the channel-- not each other. Cool it.

brudgon wrote:but ten models on the screen for me is too much

for me too, sometimes I'm pissed that I'm not an octopus.

nighthawk in Last nights show thread wrote:It's an erotic channel and does the best for survive in the FTA-area.

...

So don't reduce the fantastic ladies there on nakedness and things without soul/feelings.

...

But I am very curious how long does it take till the channel will disappear from Astra/Hotbird if it works in the way like you wish. To be not wrong allow me a question:
Did you ever call or write ? Probably not. But this is it for what ETV is defined by itself. Interactivity

I hope not to be heretic and I wouldn't be 'self-referential' but, as you know, in the "books" I wrote here:
[Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig]
(probably this thread had more visibility in its original place)


the conclusion is another:

1) Censorship rules should be interpreted correctly by a valid lawyers' team.

2) It's possible for a channel to air a good content without risks and,
at the same time, to air a crap and extra-censored content but risking much more. Unfortunately ETV seems to love "ignorance and money for nothing", following the second way.

3) The main risk is "interactivity through smss", because according to the laws, the combination "request on screen" (money) + "girl's answer at the microphone and request fulfilled" could be interpreted as "prostitution" (even if we think differently).

Anyway I don't agree in one point:

"So don't reduce the fantastic ladies there on nakedness and things without soul/feelings."


What should I think? As soon as one girl removes her bra she looses her soul and feelings?
On the phone these girls are free to say everything...even to be much more "dirty" than just removing a bra or showing their pants, but according to you their soul and feelings are saved...
Mmmhhh, sorry but there's something I don't understand: a woman's soul can't be expressed by what she says or what she wears in "certain" moments
and it's not our duty to judge it.

I think it's just pure convenience to have a large number of girls who don't undress:

a) They are cheaper
b) You have to spend a lot of money, calling and having the hope to see them in a certain way
c) After having spent a fortune you see them completely dressed.

Sorry, but according to me "censorship rules" have nothing to do with this.
It's only a "particular way" to run a business.
And, as I said before, it's a way consisting in broadcasting an "extra-self-censored" content (employing a large number of girls who don't undress), but risking very much at the same time (smss problem).

In poor words: a wrong direction (my personal view).

Greetings

Dear glassy,

you are right. They announced a feetshow for sunday night. But anyway there was pussyshows yesterday but Jane for example used the shadow in the room, that she was naked but you couldn´t see much....

But i have i one point to say. Yesterday they say Eve can´t show nudity because about blah blah.

But i get really angry if she makes this afternoon nudity shots for 10 euro. This would be the biggest lie in EtV ever.

over the last few days more and more of the day show stuff is finding its way into the night shows. Things are getting softer and softer with many requests for feet shows suddenly turning up or soft requests for balloon shows or horse riding imitations. I really think a lot of these requests are produced "in house" and are not genuine requests. Could there be a foot show coming up ??

HvB wrote:

Bad-Boy wrote:Looking at the model list for tomorows photo shooting there is no need for the paravent (except Janine)
But I'm sure they will use it to raise the interest of some morons who pay 10€ for naked pictures. lol

You have some info on Nansi turning soft?

Nancy was added just a few mins ago.

Bad-Boy wrote:Looking at the model list for tomorows photo shooting there is no need for the paravent (except Janine)
But I'm sure they will use it to raise the interest of some morons who pay 10€ for naked pictures. lol

You have some info on Nansi turning soft?

Bad-Boy wrote:Eve in her first nightshow. What will happen?
Looking at the model list for tomorows photo shooting there is no need for the paravent (except Janine)
But I'm sure they will use it to raise the interest of some morons who pay 10€ for naked pictures. lol

the world is beautiful because is various

Eve in her first nightshow. What will happen?
Looking at the model list for tomorows photo shooting there is no need for the paravent (except Janine)
But I'm sure they will use it to raise the interest of some morons who pay 10€ for naked pictures. lol

fcn2011 wrote:That´s the problem. As long they don´t say her age you can only think about their age.

I am sorry but Ronny looked older as 27 for me and for Lillian i have no words.... Randa for sure looks young to me... It is a miracle if they don´t say how old they are.... And then you have the problem if they are milfs of teenies or ...... come on it is to difficult. Who cares how old they are if you like them

Even if they did say a number, you wouldn't know it's true.
Generally my impression is only a few of them are beyond 30 (Aria, Lilian, maybe Athina, and some I don't know the names of), actually my guess for Randa is rather middle to end of 20.
But you are right, actually it doesn't matter, most of us won't have the opportunity to have one of their favourites as girlfriend anyway, and to enjoy them on the screen or also on the phone it's fine if they are that old as they are.
And sometimes imagination is better than reality

Regards
Joker

As regards the age of models as for a lady generally, you cannot say the oldest is........X

But you can say the youngest is: Karry.