| Autor | Beiträge |
|---|---|
|
Hi guys---the post from Passion said it all--well said
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last night show was a very good one. Fulfilled with a good mood of the Ladies
nice performances and a lot of fun supported by the best moderator Joanna. I say this not only why my favorite was in but also to appreciate the complete performance of all the Ladies. There was all what a good Night Show needs. The same like every Tuesday with the five Ladies in it. Maybe someone complains two ladies refused to fulfill the wish from a VIP for getting full naked. For me anyway not necessary to get full naked they have other values. For they which mean a good show is defined through full nakedness only... Let me say it in this way: The reason not to fulfill the wish in complete (but they did it very nice) is ? Biological. Once a month. This should be enough words to understand and note what is meant. It keeps the respect for the Ladies and is explanation enough. (very difficult but I hope found the right balance) Best Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
night shows very good the last 20 nights worth watching total 7 video (mashiara 1,carla 1,isabella 2,kia 1, kristina 1,kate 1)how much beautiful 20 night shows total how much hours 7 video night shows very good
respects and loves |
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't seen the show last night, but by the views expressed by those who saw it,
it seems that it was not very interesting.  And I don't think that this is due to the fact that there was no Scarlet, was replaced by Kia  , which is a very nice model.In my view, this means that not enough 5 "important" models to receive many phone calls and SMS, obviously it takes other, i.e. new models and/or new ideas. We should allow to models to be hotter and provocative.  The Director was more attentive to the hot moments of the show. It is useless, for example, that the models do a scene like "Basic Instinct" if the Director switch a camera or show the models from the chest up. If the models spilling out his legs without underwear, the Director you have to show the models in between legs!!! But this is a long speech on which all seem to agree, but ETV does not want to listen or understand Perhaps these my considerations could be done in the "General Discussion" thread, but the opportunity to say these things I got from the post of this thread. Nice day to all.   Passion |
|
|
|
|
|
Just a thought : what if the idea of the direction is to say : oh look the show is so bad now, oh look it is so much better with the pornstar girls ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
glassy wrote:Well they didn't make much lolly (money) last night. It was dead within 2 hours after a promising start. After a drop in calls and sms to the studio there was nothing left to do but suck santas lolly. Maybe santa was a little early in cumming to empty his sacks ho ho ho It was in the same vein that monday but quite different for me nevertheless. Seriously, who wants to sleep when Mashiara's here ?
|
|
|
|
|
Well they didn't make much lolly (money) last night. It was dead within 2 hours after a promising start. After a drop in calls and sms to the studio there was nothing left to do but suck santas lolly. Maybe santa was a little early in cumming to empty his sacks ho ho ho
|
|
|
|
|
|
another ugly show yesterday night despite of the beautifull girl but stupid request like sitting on a baloon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tarl_Cabot wrote:yes for Chelsea, no for the other models. Having watched last night's show let me say that the opposite is right...specially when it comes to the new stars like Carla and Isabella , they really tried to be active and exerted all their best but never get attention . But it seemed that both of them were intended to be neutralized during the whole show , and no conspiracy theory here , but it's an old molvanians habit . And yes Chelsea did a great show last night , and she truly worths a big big credit , and by the way she's not only such a very hot model , but also a very interesting personality But I wonder if she would keep the same level of enthusiasm if she get ignored or even had a very limited time through only the far wide angel like what happened with Carla . |
|
|
|
|
The last night show was hot, but not virtually many before it. 2 hot honey shows, were made good very much.
I am disappointed by Isabella a little bit. If her first two night shows were considerably better, nevertheless, yesterday was to be felt by the positive energy only a little. Hopefully it becomes better during the next night show (Wednesday)! |
|
|
|
|
Tarl_Cabot wrote:jonas wrote:But compared with many other current night shows camera work was quite good last night. I, too, think it's a mix of both. I mean, there are times where models really do nothing, and times where they are not shown. It's kind of like a vicious circle, there isn't a real "first" cause or reason, it's all a tourbillon (so also zorgaux will understand!  ).Yesterday, I just don't understand why, when Carla announced her "full"strip, the regie showed ONLY Kate & Penelope. I mean, it is also a question of timing, if you want to show both things, wait for one to be finished, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
jonas wrote:But compared with many other current night shows camera work was quite good last night. yes for Chelsea, no for the other models. of course is also the activity of a model an influence for this. so maybe the other models would have gotten more camera time if they would have been as active as Chelsea. |
|
|
|
|
I many times complained about bad camera work in the current ETV.
Camera work in last night show was not perfect like in the good old times when the cameras stayed at ONE action until it was finished. Such a good camera work you have sometimes but seldom in daytime shows with only 2-3 models. But compared with many other current night shows camera work was quite good last night. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[quote='jonas']I have the impression that many viewers didn`t get that, what they hoped and expected from their soft models. So they were disappointed about this show. But I don`t think that their "sweethearts" were shown bad by the camera - or that it was forbidden for them to do things which other models an do. Don`t forget: Kate stayed longer at ETV than Chelsea! Why should there be a censorship for Kate?
Elie is one of the best show directors (maybe the best), and except the audio problems in CHELSEA`s tickle show at 2.12 CET(it was corrected in repetition!) it was a good work of the team behind the cameras [quote='jonas'] Kate tried several times to get the attention of the cameras for close-ups which was ignored by your favorite director. Elie should apply for a job in a butcher shop producing minced meat. She is good in cutting a solid piece into many small scattered sequences with nervous camera shiftings thus steering the pleasure of watching towards an anti-climax. If you could have a delicious juicy Sirloin Steak but get served a lousy Mac Burger , would you still praise that restaurant ? |
|
|
|
|
I have the impression that many viewers didn`t get that, what they hoped and expected from their soft models. So they were disappointed about this show. But I don`t think that their "sweethearts" were shown bad by the camera - or that it was forbidden for them to do things which other models an do. Don`t forget: Kate stayed longer at ETV than Chelsea! Why should there be a censorship for Kate?
I was not disappointed. I got more than I expected (and I expected very much of this show!).  Elie is one of the best show directors (maybe the best), and except the audio problems in CHELSEA`s tickle show at 2.12 CET(it was corrected in repetition!) it was a good work of the team behind the cameras @Chris Why should I be angry about you? Every viewer has his own taste, and that`s good! |
|
|
|
