| Autor | Beiträge |
|---|---|
|
|
[quote- July 6th, 2014 - Nightshow -
When the circus came to town. We enjoyed...][/quote] Fantastic work, Hilbert. Thank you for this funny overview. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
stegiato wrote:I can't remember the last not boring show. Maybe 2 months ago?What do you expect? For me last night a really good show of my favorites (OK, the last hour maybe was a bit [edit: wrong word] modest), even if camera work and -mixer had some potential for improvement. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
I can't remember the last not boring show. Maybe 2 months ago?
|
|
|
|
|
|
A fantastic show of Kia last night. Not only doing a great show herself also motivating the other girls
 And even for the video mixer a Consecutive scenes with the same girl and well dosed changing the perspective. Now they only need to fix the technical problems with the picture quality, when the girls move the picture blurs and often wrong or even pumping focus. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
lucifer70 wrote:Another amazing model (?) comes on the ETV's screens to turn on the nights ..... All "...- Discussion & Chat" is about and still holding it on the screen. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another amazing model (?) comes on the ETV's screens to turn on the nights .....
Too bad she looks like more of a longshoreman rather than an erotic model . EuComicTV ... another success! 
|
|
|
|
JohnGuitar wrote:jeegrobot wrote:So Penelope was the model with the largest SMS. Now i know that the problem of nightshows isn't ETV,the problem are the viewers. Penelope symbolizes exactly the boredom and the lack of passion in the nightshows. well put both of you totally agree |
|
|
|
|
jeegrobot wrote:So Penelope was the model with the largest SMS. Now i know that the problem of nightshows isn't ETV,the problem are the viewers. Penelope symbolizes exactly the boredom and the lack of passion in the nightshows. What a very bad surprise and worse judgement, how come Penelope got so many SMS in one night knowing that she is the most evil in ETV history. Most of viewers including myself complained about her lack of ability and enthusiasm for not giving us what she is recruited for, but despite our strong grievance she still there making money for nothing. Penelope will never change her attitude till she lacks the courage to see her herself who she is and what she is doing to attract her client, so let her carry on destroying what of good reputation remaining in ETV.  JohnGuitar |
|
|
|
|
|
So Penelope was the model with the largest SMS. Now i know that the problem of nightshows isn't ETV,the problem are the viewers. Penelope symbolizes exactly the boredom and the lack of passion in the nightshows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To judge from the quality of the screenshots at least Hilbert watched the show on tv - I stopped watching because the picture quality is so damn bad after they changed to 16:9.
I guess that all the viewers who watched on other devices like pc, notebook, tablet or even smartphone are very happy with the new standards but tv sucks a lot. If they did it by purpose to make the viewers watch the livestream on their website they may win some customers but lose some others who are not able or don't want to use other devices. I'm still hoping for improvements, though. |
|
|
|
|
Hi Slowfox hope you are well. I did make a reference to the current models. I mentioned ( not word for word) that now we have a scattering of models in a cold lifeless studio who at times struggle to portray anything sexy or erotic. Yes it's not all about being explicit but check out most of the video clips posted in the video request section posted usually the morning after a night show. What do most pf them contain ? Yes close up shots of models between their legs- accidental or not. How many sms msgs during a show are for a model to show her pussy ??. Again I will say its not all about open legs but some of the best shows years ago were of the girls touching each other intimately while wearing pants. Kaleya was the queen of tease and could have you on the edge of your seat just waiting on that glimpse of pussy. Sometimes it never happened but a lot of times it did. This type of action is what I feel is missing from todays Eurotic and their cast of newer models. Not getting enough coaching or training ? who knows but a mix of this inability to tease mixed with a reluctance of Eurotic to allow more up close and personal camera work lends itself to produce in my opinion lack lustre shows. Eurotic are having to rely too heavily on their 'stars' who are still going strong from shows many years back to prop up the night shows as the Eurotic seem to be struggling to get newer 'fresher' models to enhance night shows. Seeing more or less the same mix of models several times a week looking bored and fed up does nothing to encourage me to watch more or even think about sending in an sms- which I used to do. Yes one mans burger is anoher mans steak ha ha. But as you say the studio does not lend itself to a cosy erotic night in with the girls. Less heli cam and more handheld views of the girls may help. The last good show I saw was the white stockings and underwear show a few nights ago. So simple but effective-just like the good old days. Have a good day thanks for the reply- glassy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
glassy wrote:Thanks for your reply. Yes each of us sees a show in a different way. I have both a 4-3 tv and a 16-9 flat screen which I can switch between as I do video production for a hobby now. The recordings I have from years ago which I put onto dvd discs are far more explicit than todays offerings. I don't know how far you go back but I saw and recorded a lot of live night shows which have contributed to the Good old Days request section in this forum. Sabrina showing her pussy with open legs in close up on a regular basis. Kaleya doing the same along with models rubbing each others pussies. Great close ups of Inez wearing see through pants while putting her hand inside to rub herself. Lace doing bondage on the girls with ropes pulled tight up between their legs. All in glorious close up where the models tended to be more static laying on a sofa allowing the camera to slowly glide up and down the model. Eurotic are running scared these days. Kia or Kristina get themselves into great poses for the camera during their shows but time and time again the camera avoids sexy views of the girls even if they are wearing pants under their tights !!! Years ago the camera would have lingered on the model just wearing see through tights. I could go on but I would rather watch my dvd recordings which show a much more inventive channel which wasn't afraid to be explicit than what they produce now. To many theatrical overtones and storylines are a million miles away from what Eurotic used to be. Sure a channel has to move with the times and regulations change but a lot of what was shown years ago could easily be replicated today. But with an increasing use of the heli cam rather than hand held cameras which took the viewer close into the model. The glory days are they are called are well and truly gone. The models had an aura and personality which few models can match these days. They truly were stars. Now we get a scattering of models in a cold looking studio who at times struggle to portray anything erotic (I won't name names). But- to each his own. If your happy with Eurotic these days then I am happy for you. But for me it has lost its raw raunchy and inventive style of production which attracted most of us to Eurotic in its early days. Thanks for your reply. Happy viewing. Please allow me to give you a reply. Well, I am watching ETV since 3,5 years only and am really not an expert regarding 'the good old days'. However, what I am missing in your above assessment is any reference to the girls now present. Above is only mentioning camera, management and censor issues, the ex-models and such. What I am missing is any reference to those actually making the show today and being the store sign of the channel, i.e. the girls in front of the camera. I rather believe that in 'the good old days' the girls were, say, different. In the meantime there is a new generation with a new, or different approach and attitude. Erotic doesn't mean necessarily explicitness, but everybody seems to believe that only expliciteness is erotic. For me it is not. Afaik the girls now in the line up, the so called hot models, prefer an erotic performance over an explicit exhibition of their inner thighs. Many of the shots you like to see so much, are taken without consensus of the girls, however, they cannot really protect themselves against what the camera guys, director and control room dare to show. In my view not a good basis for trust amongst those building the night show teams. Anyway, everybody as he/she likes or dislikes. Only speaking for me, I like the (for obvious reasons) only few shows I decide to watch, but personally I have a little problem with the atmosphere this pretty cold garage studio creates. I want to believe that this meager scenario is only an interims solution and a step in a direction leaving room for quick redecoration of the studio, by whatever technical means or efforts are necessary. Slow |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your reply. Yes each of us sees a show in a different way. I have both a 4-3 tv and a 16-9 flat screen which I can switch between as I do video production for a hobby now. The recordings I have from years ago which I put onto dvd discs are far more explicit than todays offerings. I don't know how far you go back but I saw and recorded a lot of live night shows which have contributed to the Good old Days request section in this forum. Sabrina showing her pussy with open legs in close up on a regular basis. Kaleya doing the same along with models rubbing each others pussies. Great close ups of Inez wearing see through pants while putting her hand inside to rub herself. Lace doing bondage on the girls with ropes pulled tight up between their legs. All in glorious close up where the models tended to be more static laying on a sofa allowing the camera to slowly glide up and down the model. Eurotic are running scared these days. Kia or Kristina get themselves into great poses for the camera during their shows but time and time again the camera avoids sexy views of the girls even if they are wearing pants under their tights !!! Years ago the camera would have lingered on the model just wearing see through tights. I could go on but I would rather watch my dvd recordings which show a much more inventive channel which wasn't afraid to be explicit than what they produce now. To many theatrical overtones and storylines are a million miles away from what Eurotic used to be. Sure a channel has to move with the times and regulations change but a lot of what was shown years ago could easily be replicated today. But with an increasing use of the heli cam rather than hand held cameras which took the viewer close into the model. The glory days are they are called are well and truly gone. The models had an aura and personality which few models can match these days. They truly were stars. Now we get a scattering of models in a cold looking studio who at times struggle to portray anything erotic (I won't name names). But- to each his own. If your happy with Eurotic these days then I am happy for you. But for me it has lost its raw raunchy and inventive style of production which attracted most of us to Eurotic in its early days. Thanks for your reply. Happy viewing.
|
|
|
|
|
glassy wrote:Once again the hype is better than the show. The strippers worked hard last night but their efforts were so often covered by cameras too far from the action. There was so much potential for good shots of the girls but as Eurotic likes to protect our adult eyes from what's inside a strippers pants these days, the outcome was a show hardly worth a mention in the afternoon hours a few years ago. Have the camera operators marked up their viewfinders for 16-9 ??. So many times the strippers were cut above or below the waist resulting in good views of their stomachs or knees ha ha. Was it a Swiss team builder in charge last night ?? Ha ha (sorry guys). A Samba girl show may be more revealing though. Could have been so so good -- but- it wasn't and don't blame the strippers. I'm sorry, Glassy, but I have to disagree totally with you. In my view, yesterday's show was one of the best I have seen, with lots of action, full nudity and good camera shots. You compare what you saw yesterday with shows you have seen a few years ago. I suggest to have a good look at recordings of those old shows you remember so well and then tell me again whether the old stuff was more explicit or erotic (I did this a few days ago and was amazed about how heavily censored the shows were compared to today). You complain about the camera being too far away or parts of the girls being cut off. Well, you can't have both, complete girls and zoomed images, at the same time. With wide screen video, which is in my view a great improvement, this is even more of a problem, since the girls tend to be vertical whereas the screen extends most horizontally. Perhaps you have to invest in a wide screen monitor or TV to see it all. I think the cameramen have to get more used to the new format but they are doing pretty well already after only a few days. Did you notice that in this show even Lauren stripped fully naked at least two times. Great to see this beauty enter the premier league of Eurotic models. |
|
|
|
|
|
Once again the hype is better than the show. The strippers worked hard last night but their efforts were so often covered by cameras too far from the action. There was so much potential for good shots of the girls but as Eurotic likes to protect our adult eyes from what's inside a strippers pants these days, the outcome was a show hardly worth a mention in the afternoon hours a few years ago. Have the camera operators marked up their viewfinders for 16-9 ??. So many times the strippers were cut above or below the waist resulting in good views of their stomachs or knees ha ha. Was it a Swiss team builder in charge last night ?? Ha ha (sorry guys). A Samba girl show may be more revealing though. Could have been so so good -- but- it wasn't and don't blame the strippers.
|
|
|
|
