I'm confused about something...

0 (0 Bewertung(en))

(keine Bewertung bisher)

Banner
  • Pages (1):
  • 1
Autor Beiträge

12.11.2007, 09:22

I'm confused about something...

I'm confused about something.   From reading the posts in these forums, I have discerned that there are three classes of model on eUrotic TV:  Hot, Soft, and Barbie.   A little common sense and context has helped me to establish that the 'Hot' models are the ones that show everything.   The so-called 'Soft' models appear to be the ones that show little or nothing with deliberate intent.   I'm confused as to the distinction between 'Soft' and 'Barbie' however.  

What is the difference between a 'Soft' model and a 'Barbie' model?

18.11.2007, 18:29

Re: I'm confused about something...

I am completely confused about Jenifer's classification.

Here she is qualified as "soft",  in weekly ETV schedule she is called "hot".

What is right? Did anything happen over night?

Did  the ice melt in ETV studio during her performance?

13.11.2007, 19:05

Re: I'm confused about something...

Keep it simple I say! 3 categories:
1 shows everything (given current restrictions)
2 topless
3 shows nothing

Don't include oops or tease. So Beyonce stays at Barbie level.

Perhaps we should change the classification as "Hot" is too ambiguous. I think Fanny is hot when she is up for it but she will never qualify for that accolade. How about using the international language of Eurotic?:
1 muschi
2 titten
3 fussen (is there anyone who refuses to show her feet?)

13.11.2007, 13:41

Re: I'm confused about something...

I'm not all confused - live at the moment 1 and 2

my very small contribution to this discussion
erotic = Sandra in latex, stockings and playboy string. PS Juliet was also in this league.

the others are by comparison = the girl next door look

13.11.2007, 11:24

Re: I'm confused about something...

Gee. I like this topic. Just what a forum should be all about.

Interesting point about Sesil and Fanny. On several recent shows both girls stayed practically covered up for the entire duration.

I believe that the classifications deal more with eroticism than just plain nudity. But if that was carried through to the letter then many 'hot' models would have to be demoted as well. Cos there's nothing erotic in getting yer kit off and just standing there.

Who said "You can please some of the people some of the time. You can plaese some of the people all of the time. But you cannot please all the people all the time"

13.11.2007, 10:46

Re: I'm confused about something...

And the new__soft_model on ETV2 this morning is 


Alexa
 

Edit
 
Is cameraViki the new soft model?

13.11.2007, 01:47

Re: I'm confused about something...

Methinks da boss AKA Mr Mauro used the term 'Barbie' without my express consent. I know I should have sent him more money -))

There will always, in any classification, be grey areas as a model can change her focus.

But, for the record,  I never used the word 'hot' in my earlier reply. At most, Gia is a soft model and that is consistant with my description. Joanna remains a barbie as there is never any contact with another model.

12.11.2007, 22:33

Re: I'm confused about something...

I'd add a fourth class: waste of time. :))))))))

12.11.2007, 22:22

Re: I'm confused about something...

So Gia, who has just kissed Megita's breast (I think there's no more interactive than this), according to DB definition has to be named a hot model (in this site she's a barbie)?

And Joanna, who is one of most interactive wheter she didn't show neither her feet (according to my barbie definition, actually she did once or twice but with her pantyhose on:))))) has to be named a barbie as is in this site?

(I forget) For me they both are barbies anyway.

12.11.2007, 13:34

Re: I'm confused about something...

Of course every semplification is a reduction, and I well knew the word "Barbie" was originally referred to that new girls introduced a saturday morning (July, as Uriah Heep song?) by Kaleya: Joanna (at that time Ju, sometimes she is still called Juanna), Kat, Zia, Paquita (where is she gone?), and some other I forgot.

12.11.2007, 11:03

Re: I'm confused about something...

As the 'author' of the word 'Barbie' I will try to clarify.

The term originated from the description of the very pretty, and mostly young, girls from those special morning shows who just danced a little and spoke when spoken to. There was no inter-action between models except in the very first few shows that had a theme.

A few models who 'crossed-over' very quickly were introduced in these shows. Samira, Sesil, Patricia and Lilian come to mind.

So that is what I believe the intention of the term is meant. If the girl inter-acts then whatever she shows she is not a Barbie. That said, the descriptions are slightly wrong. Zia, an original Barbie, is now a soft model. Naliny is also a soft model. Bionce, could never be described as a Barbie whereas Elektra most certainly is.

12.11.2007, 10:56

Re: I'm confused about something...

Hot: show everything (including cigarettes or tampax for brokingbull's joy :))))))))

Soft: show breasts (once called topless models)

Barbies: show nothing (maybe sometimes their feet :)))))))

Beonce and Leti showed her breasts once or twice, Beonce I remember when she had a shower, but I think it's correct name them as barbies.

First barbie ever at ETV was Julia, but she was on of the hottest at talking.

12.11.2007, 09:44

Re: I'm confused about something...

I think the difference is that the soft models at least do something (they move, sometimes a little tease etc.)..... while barbies just sit down doing anything for the whole show...

  • Pages (1):
  • 1