Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

dogman wrote:Thanks Oldroyal,now i know,think you might be let down though.

.

Do you mean in not seeing Mrs May on Babestation nights

Re - Dogman - Post 617.
"Why is Theresa May going to be out of a job next mouth,please enlighten me. "

Hello Dogman,

I will try to enlighten you as best as I can.

First, a bit of background so you know where I am coming from.
I am a mid-60s married homeowner, with the intention of leaving our home to our grandson, so that he
can pay of his university debt and hopefully get on the housing ladder.

I count myself lucky I am in a position to do that.

I am what is considered a typical Conservative voter, though I have not always being so; but that is
not important. What is important is the future, the future for both the elderly in their old age, and
also for the younger generation, finding a job, getting their own house etc.

This takes me to the crux of my assertion that their will be a different occupant of 10 Downing Street
next month.

1) A number of grey voters like myself that I have spoken to, feel like I do - Betrayed.
Betrayed, that our homes will be taken from us, whilst the super rich fox-hunting brigade & corporate giants
will continue to avoid paying their share to societies needs.
Some, I have spoken to will not vote in the June General Election, others have said they will vote Labour.
None, have mentioned voting for Lib-Dems; a 2nd EU referendum and 1p on income tax to help pay the
salaries of over-paid NHS trust bosses - no thank you.

2) New teenage voters, voting in their first election may well be swayed by the promise of no university fees, and a chance of affordable housing.

Speaking for myself, I am not a political die-hard; neither Capitalist nor Socialist.
Political philosophies have no interest for me.
My vote is based on how political parties respond to ever growing changes in our society, and more personally, how they best meet my needs and aspirations. As soon as they take my loyalty for granted and treat me less fairly than others, then I
do a fair amount of deep soul searching.

There you have it Dogman.
My assertion based on part gut feeling and part understanding of my fellow greys.

As for the gut feeling bit, there could be a slight mishap in the guts. I once had a gut feeling in
the early 1960s that Dave Clark Five would be more successful than The Beatles.

With regards to the streams I managed to get them to record only a few hours ago and then nothing! now they can record again but what I do find strange however is whenever they are unable to record on my laptop the vlc icon still appears below the bat file telling me otherwise, so many mega bytes are being used only to see fuck all. How can a file run and show nothing one minute and then the next have it all appear again. I don't know............I'm confused!

Knowing my luck they'll probably put on a naked 2 for 1 and have them going at it like rabbits. This ofcourse will be the point in which the streams will fail again to record if such as unknown event were to occur, which is about as likely as Teresea May losing the general election to then appear on some old granny channel shaking her wrinkly arse cheeks around (Perish the thought!)

Lmao

Well put, OldRoyal. Your analogy is most succinct vis a vis Babestation and Theresa May

"I can only assume this some last gasp effort to get some final cash through the doors before they have to reconsider their business strategy. Currently it seems a strategy that is designed to alienate all potential viewers and callers, to remove any chance of new customers, and to push existing fans away."

Above quote taken from Dirk362's post number 599.
I couldn't help but equate the above point with the Tory election manifesto relating to social care.
Substitute voters and members for viewers, callers etc and it is exactly the same logic.

Perhaps Babestation have lined up Theresa May for night shows when she is out of a job next month

Not often i'm around but. A certain stream company will not stop adding streams. This only adds to their server fuck ups! also, their profits. I've never known such a ignorant company has them

I guess that mr.p doesnt watch the stream, he is busy in his shit promotions and the stupid curtains shows

I don't see the logic In streaming if the more people that watch the worse any production gets, why bother with streaming at all. I just don't see any advantage to the makers. Instead of investing their cash in internet technology, why not invest in making the content of the fucking programmes better.

I see no benefit to anyone for the upgrade to full 1080p streams. And let's not forget, not everyone has high bandwidth internet. Why not improve bandwidth allocation on sensible resolutions? Say 1000-1200Kbps for 404p, 1400-1800Kbps for 720p, etc. The actual number of people who will watch at 1080p must be minimal after the initial interest of seeing full-hd of any particular babe.

However, they have maintained the VBR config on most channels, so you can get different stream resolutions if the player believes your bandwidth can cope. VBR values (suffix number to playpath) are now defined as 1=1920x1080, 2=1024x576, 3=720x404. Bandwidth is not sufficient on all these to keep up with video being shown, which is also why they go blocky sometimes.
That said, it's the same stream servers for all resolutions hence why they sometimes struggle. They did migrate to new ones a month or so back, which perhaps was preparation for this change.

Personally I think they'd have been better off fixing the f**king interlaced issue they've had for years, which ruins the picture quality to the point it's unwatchable when there's a reasonable amount of moment on screen.

It's to Babestation's shame that they don't put the horny lovely Mia Green on nights. She oozes sex

best-reporting wrote:

richardhead wrote:When too many people connected to it means it gets overloaded,.

Can any person here know the number of people which makes the stream stop? When 1000 people are watching is this too much or is it many more than this.
When studio 66 and also babe station are using the same company can babe station stop as too many people are watching studio 66 in the same night. or has every channel a width for its own.

Nobody can answer this question as it's not about the number of people,it's all about the amount of traffic,just like if you open a few browsers on your pc it goes a lot slower due to the amount of cpu.Same with servers,so babestation have upgraded to hd streams which means more incoming data to deal with and more outgoing to serve to network viewers who are logging in.As the night goes on less people are viewing as they are going to bed or whatever so less traffic and the servers run faster.The newer servers are much bigger and can handle a lot more information but firestorm are useing older and slower ones.

Perhaps they might upgrade soon to handle this problem.

richardhead wrote:When too many people connected to it means it gets overloaded,.

Can any person here know the number of people which makes the stream stop? When 1000 people are watching is this too much or is it many more than this.
When studio 66 and also babe station are using the same company can babe station stop as too many people are watching studio 66 in the same night. or has every channel a width for its own.

AniseedBalls wrote:For me the streams became impossible last night, both babestation and studio66 just kept buffering and it became, as I said, impossible to watch. I'm no techno, so can someone tell me why a girl in her bedroom in Bucharest can find her way on to my screen without much trouble. But the professional broadcasters can't.
Please someone, enlighten me.

BS and S66 transmit to what is known as a server.You connect to this server to get the stream.When too many people connected to it means it gets overloaded,The people providing the servers are called FireStorm Media.

FireStorm servers=SHIT.

I hope this explains it.

For me the streams became impossible last night, both babestation and studio66 just kept buffering and it became, as I said, impossible to watch. I'm no techno, so can someone tell me why a girl in her bedroom in Bucharest can find her way on to my screen without much trouble. But the professional broadcasters can't.
Please someone, enlighten me.