| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
What has happened to Madison Rose? her shows are now as bad as Ella Jolie and Lucy Zara, she is still a lovely girl with a nice curvy body but she really looks like she doesn't give a shit anymore
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who remembers a certain shopping channel, (now defunct). The channel that had the very desireable Sarah Hendy as a presenter, that lady was sexy, she wore the shortest of skirts, that covered very little. She smiled a lot. And made cocks stand to attention.
I know it's got fuck all to do with babechannels, but I miss seeing sexy girls on our screen, even though babes are naked, they are not sexy. Far from it. They are just a commodity of a stereotypical idea of sexy. But in reality they are just the opposite. They are boring and bland. If not all, a vast majority of them are. |
|
|
|
|
AniseedBalls wrote:It would come as no surprise to me if I was to find out that sexual favours was a normal procedure on these shows. There seems to be a group of girls that no matter how poor they are at presenting a show keep their place in the line up. The reason Ive come up with this conclusion is, younger, much prettier girls, who are much better than the established girls come along and do a fresh, more sexy show. But after a short time they are gone. A lot of the established girls on Babestation are still quite young even though it feels like they have been around forever, i still find a few of the girls on Babestation attractive but i would like to see some new faces, however i don't think that many glamour models want to to nightshows these days, a lot of the best looking new girls are daybabes but they hate freeloaders so won't get their tits out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AniseedBalls, I'm of the same opinion as you regarding the casting couch scenario. Though it can't be proved, nevertheless I'm convinced it goes on and I have heard of the odd apocryphal story.
|
|
|
|
|
It would come as no surprise to me if I was to find out that sexual favours was a normal procedure on these shows. There seems to be a group of girls that no matter how poor they are at presenting a show keep their place in the line up. The reason Ive come up with this conclusion is, younger, much prettier girls, who are much better than the established girls come along and do a fresh, more sexy show. But after a short time they are gone.
Maybe the casting couch plays a part in the selection of girls, because let's face it this is supposed to be a job where glamour is the main criteria. But is it? The amount of pretty girls that have come and gone is a scandal. Leaving us with older less attractive models. I wonder why? I suppose all I'm saying is that the decision makers should stop thinking with their cocks and start giving the viewing public a show worth watching. Of course it's only my opinion that sexual favours or handed out, please don't think this is a fact. But also you have to wonder how some of these girls are still here after years doing the same thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly Lutonbloke, Ashley does indeed have a fantastic body, however her static performances just don't do it for me and neither does Alice's either. On the + side I thought last night was a better night on Babestation than usual as it was street lights ahead of the diabolical shit which its rivals S66 served up
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #427 Last edited: 13.10.2016, 04:38 13.10.2016, 04:09 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
That was the first time i have seen Ashley properly naked on BS she had no bra and stockings on and she was even facing the camera, her body is fantastic i just wish she got into some better positions like Sophie, Jenna and Dannii do
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not saying that the content in the programmes put out by S66 is any better than what's put out by babestation, because they are both shite. It's just that S66 put out their shit much more professionally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, Scottishbloke the word is dire for describing Babestation last night. I just hope that Sophie and Jenna who are on tonight can give a great performance, but I fear that won't happen if the producer and the cameramen in particular have anything to do with it!
   By the way, in case you didn't get my last pm to you, I'm half Welsh, through my Ma, an English Da and an Irish grandma and have several relatives both in Wales and the Republic, as well as English relatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last night I got home from work, had my dinner and turned the telly on, saw about 5 minutes of Babestation before deciding to fuck off to my bed. I recorded one of the channels as I noticed Lori was on. I played in all back this morning on fast forward before deleting it. The show was horrendous, I think all the posts here have covered all the reasons and the flaws so I will simply just echo the same sentiments.
Babestation is finished now as a show for me, I'm fucking done with it, I'll still continue to hope that tonight is a better night, its just a shame that nobody is able to sack the man at the top of this shambles. I will await his resignation! |
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #423 Last edited: 10.10.2016, 19:10 10.10.2016, 17:55 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Absolutely right, Positive!
 Don't these cretins not understand that women like sex just as much as men do? And another thing, the reason why the babes get naked is because they want us to see them naked as it gives them sexual pleasure knowing guys and other women are watching them. Why don't the owners see this obvious fact and get producers and cameramen to cater for all; perv cam payers(at a very reasonable rate, please) and babe watchers who just want to watch the shows on Sky or Freeview. The cameramen come in for my most vitriolic criticism so I would appeal to the producers of the Babestation shows to tell them not to film the girls from the waist up or higher for at least 75 percent of the time in most cases; Lori being a prime example on last night's dismal offering. In the good old days of the night time shows the ratio of camera work was usually 75 to 80 per cent fully nude camera shot and only about 20 to 25 percent close up shot. Not only was it a darned sight better but they also used hand and reversed hand thongs which I loved. One last thing , why do they have to regale us with those infernal on screen graphics? At least I'm sure they could make them much smaller if they wanted to, inc. those pic and vid captions on the side of the screen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is it when you take the best away from babestation?
Ba----ation (I should place this in the fun and jokes; but it is not funny  )
|
|
|
|
|
If I had to choose one thing that I think sums up the pure fucking awfulness of the channel babestation. Then it will have to be that atrocious blue plastic glittery set. It plays havoc when watching "on stream". It just shows the type of knuckle draggers that are responsible for everyone's entertainment. If they can't see that this is crap, or they can see and can't be fucking arsed to do anything about, then what fucking chance of ever getting a decent show?Fucking zero!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #420 Last edited: 10.10.2016, 11:25 10.10.2016, 11:05 Re: Babestation - General Chat & DiscussionRallkin123 wrote:Positive, they really have been nobbled by the fanatical, potty religious Moral Right who have taken it upon themselves to save us from corrupting ourselves. You really couldn't make it up! They are pathetic the whole lot of them. It certainly does seem this way doesn't it? Something has to explain what is going on.... This boss is relatively new here. All of the evidence seems to suggest that his venture here is not concerned with having a viable business model - night after night there is nothing but counter-productive shows, so what is this really all about?.... Someone, somewhere, close enough to proceedings, ought to investigate this boss. He seems to be on a mission to refuse the public sexual pleasure, and in the process destroy his own business - It makes no logical sense!! So, maybe, logic has nothing at all to do with it - maybe he just bats for the other side, and will do anything in his power to stifle the sexual influence and power of women. He ought to be put under scrutiny and made to answer for this debacle...The whole team of cameramen that he has around him are either under stringent orders, or they have been specifically hand-picked on account of their own leanings. If we do indeed now have an enemy-within, then something needs to be done; for our sake. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #419 Last edited: 10.10.2016, 04:32 10.10.2016, 04:31 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Positive, they really have been nobbled by the fanatical, potty religious Moral Right who have taken it upon themselves to save us from corrupting ourselves. You really couldn't make it up! They are pathetic the whole lot of them.
|
|
|
