Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

I cannot find anything remotely erotic about a girl being smothered in oil. And then having to keep removing long hairs shed from extensions that are stuck on false tits and fake tans by said oil......And then to be wiped on any part of the set that it will stick to, Is for me totally gross....Just one more reason not to watch......

For it to be a truly perve cam. Would it not be more apt if it showed all the tossers who are stupid enough to pay for it.

S66 seems to have a lot of detractors, but I must say the quality of their picture is much better than Babestations, especially on the web streams. I seem to get a fuzzy haze caused by whatever background the set has. The brick background seems to be the worst. A constant battle going on with the focusing spoils it for me. I thought it may have been my equiptment, but as I said, its fine on S66.

I agree, there needs to be a balance. Kim got some great moments last night not just for perv cam, and Amanda was solid as usual, but Lori was incredibly lame. As you say, all waist up shots like watching boring Hannah Martin.

Danni was a little better, but seemed static later on.

Still, it's superior to Studio 66, so I'll give it that. Normally I'm not for perv cam in general. I guess I just enjoy watching Alice rub inside her thong and get excited by it

Positive wrote:I do know how much you seem to enjoy recording Lori's shows, Scottishbloke; and I really do appreciate these uploads. But, unfortunately, Lori does not perform for this type of nudity (perv cam). Whilst the perv cams operate we will only see Lori's legs firmly shut, apart from when she is wearing panties. The type of shows that you clearly enjoy from Lori will unfortunately be a thing of the past.

Yeah Lori used to give us some legendary flashes or near miss's from her Elite era. Perhaps the dumbing down of the shows has finally also taken its toll on Lori. On BSX the other week the type of performance she delivered was no more explicit than what she had been doing on the FTA TV show which is strange because when she's allowed to she's usually the one that'll push the boundaries more than any of the rest such as proper hand rubbing handthong sessions

Scottishbloke wrote:

mrmann wrote:10:26pm and she's already buck naked!

This perv cam crap might actually be a good idea... The women seem more excited by it. Camera dudes are a little too cautious though.

Although you made your post on the Amanda Rendall Thread I feel this needs to be given a more general answer. The majority of the time I am largely in agreement with you, however on this occasion I'm singing from a different hymn sheet. Throughout the course of the night I have seen several sessions being ruined as a consequence of Perv Cam

I've seen Amanda, Lori and Kimberley all take their panties off only for the camera to only focus on their top half. The idea of Perv Cam can work if its done properly but when all the focus is on that and taken off the actual show then it makes for a poor session unfortunately.

I do know how much you seem to enjoy recording Lori's shows, Scottishbloke; and I really do appreciate these uploads. But, unfortunately, Lori does not perform for this type of nudity (perv cam). Whilst the perv cams operate we will only see Lori's legs firmly shut, apart from when she is wearing panties. The type of shows that you clearly enjoy from Lori will unfortunately be a thing of the past.

With only Studio66 as competition it was always inevitable that the form of Babestation was always going to take a nose dive at some point but I still have faith in the long term wellbeing of this channel unlike S66 where I washed my hands of a long long time ago. Amanda Rendall coming backing a definite + point and once BS drop the whole concept of a need for Pervcam then I'm sure everything will settle down again. Would I like to see Morgan Preece back on the nightshows, ofcourse I would. She has always been one of my favourites and seeing her all wrapped up knowing what went previous is very very frustrating

Rallkin123 wrote:yeah, why do the cameramen on all the babestation channels always seem to film the girls who are naked from the waist up? they seem to do it a lot lately and i find it annoying and irritating. i thought babestation was an adult tv station, not a day time programme. please babestation bosses, don't take us viewers for idiots and show us more full nudity, top as well as bottom half and not focusing mostly on the top half when they are naked, i am sure when any babe goes nude it's because they want viewers to see them fully naked.

I am pretty sure that many of us are equally as frustrated as you about the camerawork at Babestation. But unfortunately unless the management changed hands I don't foresee the camerawork changing either. The motto of this particular manager seems to be "no one gets anything for free". So despite the fact that viewers are paying for their calls to the girls he still seems to object to the rest of the general public being given exciting shows for free: Ergo the deliberate crap camerawork.

ETA: that is the sad mentality of this regime... They would rather throw food in the bin than give it to starving children unless they have the funds to purchase.

Morgan,PLEASE come back to Babestation nights as you are one shaggable horny babe! You are wasted on the day time slot. I'm sure many viewers would agree with me,too.

yeah, why do the cameramen on all the babestation channels always seem to film the girls who are naked from the waist up? they seem to do it a lot lately and i find it annoying and irritating. i thought babestation was an adult tv station, not a day time programme. please babestation bosses, don't take us viewers for idiots and show us more full nudity, top as well as bottom half and not focusing mostly on the top half when they are naked, i am sure when any babe goes nude it's because they want viewers to see them fully naked.

mrmann wrote:10:26pm and she's already buck naked!

This perv cam crap might actually be a good idea... The women seem more excited by it. Camera dudes are a little too cautious though.

Although you made your post on the Amanda Rendall Thread I feel this needs to be given a more general answer. The majority of the time I am largely in agreement with you, however on this occasion I'm singing from a different hymn sheet. Throughout the course of the night I have seen several sessions being ruined as a consequence of Perv Cam

I've seen Amanda, Lori and Kimberley all take their panties off only for the camera to only focus on their top half. The idea of Perv Cam can work if its done properly but when all the focus is on that and taken off the actual show then it makes for a poor session unfortunately.

darren73 wrote:Oh know

[hidden link - please register]

and babestation is going on shitty too.... damn those channels and those "we taxes even the air you breath" style... fuck off....
Sorry for my language...

Oh know

I actually thought that last night Lori and Kerrie carried the show Pretti, Ashley and Olivia were very disappointing so its no surprise that Lori and Kerrie were the 2 that got most of the air time. Too many at the moment seem to be going off the boil in recent months

Positive wrote:Lori has been away for a while, and I, for one, have missed her. But coming back to perform the way she is doing, in association with this particular producer/cameraman, she may as well have stayed away.

Thankfully her show is much improved in her next stint.