Some of night show girls must be change ....

HvB wrote:

uk334 wrote:No 16 icon ? make one put it on the screen and show a leg or two, even a bra would be a start, like the Fashion channel perhaps
There are several music channels that use the 16 icon when there a saucy or sexy video ALL day. A MUSIC video and your telling me an EROTIC lol channel cannot show anything below the knees, down a blouse, even a bare leg is difficult for some girls in the daytime and evening

Please name one or two that operate under Austrian jurisdiction.

uk334 wrote:What on earth does this mean "(were the are using the visual and acoustic signaling for possibly unapropriate content for minors)"
You mean an excuse to show non sexy shows from models who should not even be in the studio of an " erotic" channel ?

I mean the signaling required in § 32 Abs. 3 PrTV-G and introduced after KOA 2.100/09-121.

HvB
Drop it !

Mr_Niceguy wrote:maybe first work it out in PM guys then later publish the conclusion

It started off me suggesting a 16 icon in the corner of the screen may allow a bit more to be shown ( Not Adult Night stuff ) in the day time.
Sorry everyone

ETV has a licence in Austria but only for a reason.
And that is money.
Public television in Austria, you can see movies in which more is like at ETV in the night show.
There are movies like "Hundstage" to see then.
Released from the age of 16.
Very recommended.

maybe first work it out in PM guys then later publish the conclusion

uk334 wrote:No 16 icon ? make one put it on the screen and show a leg or two, even a bra would be a start, like the Fashion channel perhaps
There are several music channels that use the 16 icon when there a saucy or sexy video ALL day. A MUSIC video and your telling me an EROTIC lol channel cannot show anything below the knees, down a blouse, even a bare leg is difficult for some girls in the daytime and evening

Please name one or two that operate under Austrian jurisdiction.

uk334 wrote:What on earth does this mean "(were the are using the visual and acoustic signaling for possibly unapropriate content for minors)"
You mean an excuse to show non sexy shows from models who should not even be in the studio of an " erotic" channel ?

I mean the signaling required in § 32 Abs. 3 PrTV-G and introduced after KOA 2.100/09-121.

HvB wrote:

uk334 wrote:

HvB wrote:

uk334 wrote:

HvB wrote:

uk334 wrote:It was a question thrown out as an idea !

I did not say under the Austrian Law a 16 icon would enable channels to display eurotic shows !

If it was a question, here is the answer:
There is no such option.

[snip]
Sure:
[hidden link - please register]

Nope cannot see anything at all about it. I looked in the specialised section but nowt on the list and I searched for censoreship
Can you send me a link to the actual artcicle you are suggesting to read please.

Cheers

Thanks for confirming that there is no such option, and no, as there is no such option (as you have confirmed), I can't link to it.

So why the pointless link.
Was it just plucked out of thin air.
What argument against my comments are you trying to make exactly with the link ?

none, because the pointless link is a complete collection of all media related Austrian laws and it answers

lazaridis wrote:Well, since you asked uk334 tu produce the Austrian law article, why wouldn't you do the same to explain your answer ?

As there is no 16 icon that would enable them to show anything outside the night hours (were the are using the visual and acoustic signaling for possibly unapropriate content for minors) the only way to link is to link to all related laws to show that there is nothing like that in it. Of course you will have to read all of it to see there is nothing

Last comment because this whole thread has been a waste of my time

As there is no 16 icon that would enable them to show anything outside the night hours (were the are using the visual and acoustic signaling for possibly unapropriate content for minors) the only way to link is to link to all related laws to show that there is nothing like that in it. Of course you will have to read all of it to see there is nothing [/quote]

No 16 icon ? make one put it on the screen and show a leg or two, even a bra would be a start, like the Fashion channel perhaps
There are several music channels that use the 16 icon when there a saucy or sexy video ALL day. A MUSIC video and your telling me an EROTIC lol channel cannot show anything below the knees, down a blouse, even a bare leg is difficult for some girls in the daytime and evening
What on earth does this mean "(were the are using the visual and acoustic signaling for possibly unapropriate content for minors)"
You mean an excuse to show non sexy shows from models who should not even be in the studio of an " erotic" channel ?

uk334 wrote:

HvB wrote:

uk334 wrote:

HvB wrote:

uk334 wrote:It was a question thrown out as an idea !

I did not say under the Austrian Law a 16 icon would enable channels to display eurotic shows !

If it was a question, here is the answer:
There is no such option.

[snip]
Sure:
[hidden link - please register]

Nope cannot see anything at all about it. I looked in the specialised section but nowt on the list and I searched for censoreship
Can you send me a link to the actual artcicle you are suggesting to read please.

Cheers

Thanks for confirming that there is no such option, and no, as there is no such option (as you have confirmed), I can't link to it.

So why the pointless link.
Was it just plucked out of thin air.
What argument against my comments are you trying to make exactly with the link ?

none, because the pointless link is a complete collection of all media related Austrian laws and it answers

lazaridis wrote:Well, since you asked uk334 tu produce the Austrian law article, why wouldn't you do the same to explain your answer ?

As there is no 16 icon that would enable them to show anything outside the night hours (were the are using the visual and acoustic signaling for possibly unapropriate content for minors) the only way to link is to link to all related laws to show that there is nothing like that in it. Of course you will have to read all of it to see there is nothing

HvB wrote:

uk334 wrote:

HvB wrote:

uk334 wrote:It was a question thrown out as an idea !

I did not say under the Austrian Law a 16 icon would enable channels to display eurotic shows !

If it was a question, here is the answer:
There is no such option.

[snip]
Sure:
[hidden link - please register]

Nope cannot see anything at all about it. I looked in the specialised section but nowt on the list and I searched for censoreship
Can you send me a link to the actual artcicle you are suggesting to read please.

Cheers

Thanks for confirming that there is no such option, and no, as there is no such option (as you have confirmed), I can't link to it.

So why the pointless link.
Was it just plucked out of thin air.
What argument against my comments are you trying to make exactly with the link ?

lazaridis wrote:

Mr_Niceguy wrote:[hidden link - please register]

considering the low number of votes relative to the pageviews, maybe I should consider adding another option: ETV has no problems....

Or maybe that forumers have better to do than to complain "ETV boring show" "Karry bad show" "Anna bad show" or messages like that.
.

I wish they had, but it seems they don't cause these are 80% of the posts here.

lazaridis wrote:We all know what is good and what is bad, ETV being the first to know this (since they receive dozens of such messages every day). Personnally I do not find any utility to the present thread.

If we all agreed there would be no need for such heated debating now would there... Many people use generic terms like "we want this" and "everybody thinks that", but I would like to see more exactly what are the numbers. I thought you especially didn't like these generics

Mr_Niceguy wrote:[hidden link - please register]

considering the low number of votes relative to the pageviews, maybe I should consider adding another option: ETV has no problems....

Or maybe that forumers have better to do than to complain "ETV boring show" "Karry bad show" "Anna bad show" or messages like that.

We all know what is good and what is bad, ETV being the first to know this (since they receive dozens of such messages every day). Personnally I do not find any utility to the present thread.

[hidden link - please register]

considering the low number of votes relative to the pageviews, maybe I should consider adding another option: ETV has no problems....

uk334 wrote:

HvB wrote:

uk334 wrote:It was a question thrown out as an idea !

I did not say under the Austrian Law a 16 icon would enable channels to display eurotic shows !

If it was a question, here is the answer:
There is no such option.

[snip]
Sure:
[hidden link - please register]

Nope cannot see anything at all about it. I looked in the specialised section but nowt on the list and I searched for censoreship
Can you send me a link to the actual artcicle you are suggesting to read please.

Cheers

Thanks for confirming that there is no such option, and no, as there is no such option (as you have confirmed), I can't link to it.

HvB wrote:

lazaridis wrote:

HvB wrote:

uk334 wrote:I have already mentioned would a 16 icon in the corner of a dayshow heat things a little.

Could you please link the article in the Austrian law regulating that?

HvB wrote:

uk334 wrote:It was a question thrown out as an idea !

I did not say under the Austrian Law a 16 icon would enable channels to display eurotic shows !

If it was a question, here is the answer:
There is no such option.

Well, since you asked uk334 tu produce the Austrian law article, why wouldn't you do the same to explain your answer ?

Sure:
[hidden link - please register]

Nope cannot see anything at all about it. I looked in the specialised section but nowt on the list and I searched for censoreship
Can you send me a link to the actual artcicle you are suggesting to read please.

Cheers

I am not also for it, da0 the girls ala Janine for hours are naked.
But for hours only sit around and call up is also no alternative.
Nevertheless, a cultivated mixture would not be bad.

farokh wrote:When you see night show schedules, it is indeniable that night show models shall be replaced by new models,
it is highly recommended to ETV, because night show programs are not attractive when we compare it with 2-3 years ago ....

Just my personal opinion:

Liveshows channels, in general, make their business on people's weakness. ETV is, among all these channels, the one which puts this philosophy to the limit:

Nowadays there are 2 strategies:

1- a group of new girls especially for the webshows.
2- the removal of all the "ingredients" which could make a show interesting.

This new course under the "regie" of the new strategists:

- some women like Julia, Aria & Co, who tries to mix " low level drama" and "liveshow". They have completely destroyed the atmoshere of this channel;

- some people who (for some reasons) find more interesting to feed the web business and to use the sat as an advertisment for the web architecture.

But I don't want to go off-topic:
under these conditions I think that there's no hope to see a better channel simply by changing some models.

Low levels playwrights and business strategists should be the first things to be changed, in order to see better shows. But this is possible only if viewers's weakness doesn't reach a level so low as that one of the last year.