open pussy - a question that someone dare to ask (and is me who

Hello guys,

calm down... i don't wanna to incite a sex revolution - i don't wanna push etv to porno shows (even if i wouldn't be disgusted by some harder scenes hehehe)
recent superabundance of pussy exib during the show pushed me to formulate few simple questions that i dare to ask:

open pussy is not allowed for Eurotic TV, is it right ?

and

The actual censorship will ever permit such kind of limits for a show like ETV ?

and (i know, probably this was discussed a lot before)

why for sexysat is it so different and easy to avoid censorship ??

rudv wrote:As It was an SMS of a caller asking for model laying down with open legs and pussy in close up, this was really disgusting from the director/cameraman to answer to their client with this blurred unclear image were you see nothing at all.
My question is : Is the director laughing with the callers/clients or are they chasing their clients away

I rather suppose they rather say "Oh no, not again". I think meanwhile it's no secret such a request will not be fulfilled as requested.
In the past they said they don't do it, the requests for spread legs continued, then said yes, but did something else, the requests for spread legs continued, so I think this is only is another version to say "No".

Regards
Joker

As It was an SMS of a caller asking for model laying down with open legs and pussy in close up, this was really disgusting from the director/cameraman to answer to their client with this blurred unclear image were you see nothing at all.
My question is : Is the director laughing with the callers/clients or are they chasing their clients away

kazimir wrote:I am surprised that there is no response from other members in this post. Lauren and Kia were filmed between the legs straight into the p*ss*.
Unfortunately the camera was handled by an amateur who got not get the vital parts in focus leaving us with a hazy picture...

So you really pretend they wanted to show that with correct focus?
Maybe Kia and perhaps Lauren even yes, but pretty sure not the director.

Regards
Joker

I think the whole thing has to do with the premium shows.
In the night show show only not too much so.
In the premium show it more.
But that's true only in theory, as we unfortunately know

kazimir wrote:I am surprised that there is no response from other members in this post. Lauren and Kia were filmed between the legs straight into the p*ss*.
Unfortunately the camera was handled by an amateur who got not get the vital parts in focus leaving us with a hazy picture. There might be improvement in ETV night shows and are we returning to the 2010 period where in my memory Carmen was sitting 4 hours fully undressed with her legs wide open shown in close up.

Yes kazimir! It 's all true what you say, and me too hope that we can back at the good old days.
I do not think that ETV has the amateur cameramen but rather I think that the willingness
of the director is now to show these things only on ETVShow.com. However, there is a
Latin saying "Spes ultima dea" that means: hope is always the last to die. We will see!

Good day to everyone.
Passion

I am surprised that there is no response from other members in this post. Lauren and Kia were filmed between the legs straight into the p*ss*.
Unfortunately the camera was handled by an amateur who got not get the vital parts in focus leaving us with a hazy picture. There might be improvement in ETV night shows and are we returning to the 2010 period where in my memory Carmen was sitting 4 hours fully undressed with her legs wide open shown in close up.

IMHO models are instructed very clear what they may show; for this reason they are occupied most of the time turning their body to avoid that pussy is exposed too explicitly. It is clear that for this reason models are not able to act in a natural way but the whole time stressed because they fear to show to explicitly their pussy.
Why may they not lying down and turning around showing their pussy from different sides etc etc..
Cameramen are also instructed clearly. Their main task is not to make beautiful erotic images but to avoid to bring too explicit images. Even if cameraman would show hot scenes , director then changes to other camera. The worst is the anti erotic changes f.e; the camera slowly going down and giving the impression something hot will be shown and then suddenly changing camera
I hope we will see more hot scenes and pussy like in 2010 with Kally, Claudia, Angelina etc etc and not only feet, food and balloons.

HEXiT wrote:i think some of the guys are missing the point.
the point of the show is to attract callers not only viewers so the girls have to strike a balance between showing enough to encourage the caller but not so much that the caller is done befor he says hello.
basically
if the girls get to explicit visually the caller will blow his wad to soon and hang up.
so its not really in the girls interest to go to far or all the guys will be fapping and no 1 calling.

problem is a lot of shows will hide behind regulations and such, but in reality its in there ( the girls and the shows) best interest to hit a balance between teasing, showing and censoring.
yes it will piss off guys that want hard shows but they seem to be a vocal minority for this channel.

i would say forget about trying to change the free show and ask for harder content on the vip if the girls are up for it.

(wanted to post this as it was happening, so now it goes from (flaky) memory, but I only got the Server busy-error)


last night a caller explicitly asked for lips, and the girl who answered on the mic, said they weren't allowed to do that.

next thing: Linda starts and Selena joins in to push (pun intended) the boundaries with all sorts of poses.
at one point a caller asked Linda to stand with her back to the camera and bent forward and peek back at the camera between her legs. she just went and did this. she thereby covered that, otherwise exposed, bodyexit with her hand but didn't bother about the rest (probably because she saw on the monitor that those parts were in the shade anyway and therefor basically invisible. next thing she faces the camera and they bring a little extra light and shine it up at her!

and L + S + ? standing with their back to the camera (on hiphight) showing the outline of their lips against the lights in the back of the studio.

so, where will this lead to?


it's a pity that Suzy was not joining in, because she's a stunner (if I could make a mix of some girls, most of her and some of Lauren and Roshana would definitely be in it).

I agree with many things, what you write.
Only with the censorship, I mean have trouble.
ETV defines censorship as it just fits.
Look at Angelina shows, then know what I mean.

i think some of the guys are missing the point.
the point of the show is to attract callers not only viewers so the girls have to strike a balance between showing enough to encourage the caller but not so much that the caller is done befor he says hello.
basically
if the girls get to explicit visually the caller will blow his wad to soon and hang up.
so its not really in the girls interest to go to far or all the guys will be fapping and no 1 calling.

problem is a lot of shows will hide behind regulations and such, but in reality its in there ( the girls and the shows) best interest to hit a balance between teasing, showing and censoring.
yes it will piss off guys that want hard shows but they seem to be a vocal minority for this channel.

i would say forget about trying to change the free show and ask for harder content on the vip if the girls are up for it.

piggy wrote:...

why for sexysat is it so different and easy to avoid censorship ??

Baseline: Other countries, other regulations.
But Sexysat is broadcasting their FTA shows meanwhile completely pixled and directing the viewers to their website.
At least for some time there were no (visible) FTA pussy shows anymore on Sexysat

Regards
Joker

piggy wrote:why for sexysat is it so different and easy to avoid censorship ??

most of a premium show are more censored than a night tv show, some parts are edited and cutted away, what's the reason? Not censorship, i think!
They know the costumers likes fetish, they want see stockings, feet, boots and sometimes "basic instict".

And they show pussy shots of girls standing but shy away from close up doggy or open legs when the models are wearing pants !!!!!!!!! They also show a lot of basic instinct shows from the side !!!! What's wrong with showing a close up between the legs shot when the model is wearing pants ? A lot of photos in the request section or last nights show are zoomed in sections from a video recording. It's a pity Eurotic didn't produce shows and/or views like this most nights

dick0 wrote:as mentioned before, I'm not into gyno and the only thing I like about 'doggy-style'- shots is that they show the pussy in a very, very nice way (Kristina yesterday with her back to the mirror, slightly bent over). so, the more the better.

I haven't got the fascination for that other bodyopening, that is, to my knowledge an exit.,

Lol . . . i prefer the pussy, too . . . but when properly shown from behind you cant have the one without the other