Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Autor | Beiträge |
---|---|
Ashley Emma, and that arse. With it she as become the perfect model for non-erotic tv. Standing with back to the camera you think you may just catch a glimpse of pussie if you crane your head to the right or left. But no, nothing doing. But wait, she's bending over the table slightly, surely now a sighting must come, but it doesn't. She smiles a lot and tells us how she is feeling.''I'm feeling horny'' she keeps telling us.. But us out here watching Ashley or feeling frustrated and cheated at your pathetic shows. For fuck sake girl lose the fat arse and bring us something that resembles an horny girl show.
|
|
|
|
Dear friend Scottishbloke,
I love Ashley Emma, despite this I give you my vote because what you affirm is reality. Johnbirracchio |
|
|
|
|
I would also like to know how many women go to the massage table wearing high heals, fishnet stockings and big thick granny pants. According to Lucy Summers the other night this was supposed to be sensual. It wasn't. I had a brief look at the channels last night before concluding that sleep would be a far better option. From what I seen Ashley Emma did her usual, pulled her knickers down and stood with arse facing camera for the duration of her session whilst briefly turning around just so that we could all see that her vagina was firmed closed shut with super glue, just like she always does. Lori buckby meanwhile had extreme close ups to her upper half only whilst yelling down the mic like some deranged lunatic. Some other blonde bimbo on another channels just played with her tits. To say that Babestation and co are cringworthy doesn't go far enough
![]() |
|
|
The people that work on these type of shows, be it production staff or models don't have one jot of integrity as far as doing what they do. They do it purely for the money and nothing else. And when a model does try to bring a modicum of erotica on to our screens she is soon put on the right track to tedious monotony. And then instructed into using the perve cam above all else. Either that, or be fucked off down the road to Tesco 's
But can anyone blame the money grubbers? For they have a money tree that never stops providing for them. It comes in the form of sad and lonely men who will gladly give away chunks of money in return for the flimsiest of sexual arousal. And as long as these guys are still around then so will these programmes remain what they are, "shit". |
|
|
|
|
Yep, that's as good as any new description, Scottishbloke. I like it. It's very apt
![]() |
|
|
|
What about Borestation as the shows literally send me to sleep. The NHS should just air this show whenever its time for patients to go into the operating theatre as it would save them so much money instead of using the prescribed Anaesthetic. Guaranteed to knock you out in seconds
![]() |
|
|
|
Post: #636 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 20.06.2017, 21:09 20.06.2017, 21:08 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Yeah, the name Babestation should be changed to Past Their Sell By Date channel, or maybe The Has Beens and Mingers channel
![]() |
|
|
|
Aye its an interesting article Stevie, I do recall having read it a few years ago when it was first published. With regards to what I seen on last nights effort. I think calling the show dogs shit would be a compliment to dogs shit
![]() She's only back for another big fat pay check. Once she was great but similar to Caty Cole on S66 she is merely living on past glories. With regards to her apparent weight gain it personally doesn't bother me but now that she is back its likely that she will gain even more weight because lets be honest its not like she is going to work it off any time soon lying static for hours on end like a lazy slab of meat what with her complete lack of effort and movement. If this is the shit which she is planning to serve up from this point onwards then take some advice Lucy - Just fucking retire now whilst you still have some dignity left. |
|
|
Don't know if anyone has come across this but it's interesting if a couple of years old.
[Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig] |
|
|
|
|
Post: #633 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 19.06.2017, 16:34 19.06.2017, 16:23 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
AniseedBalls, thanks for your positive feedback to my reply to you regarding the current models. I couldn't agree with you more
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Rallkin. I fully appreciate your views, and I would have been disappointed If no one would have disagreed with me. It's interesting to see in the list of names of models that attract you. The one you have omitted is the one that is the most drooled over on the station. That being the one and only (mirror mirror on the wall) Alice Goodwin, a girl I once thought to be quite tasty until I realised how fucking shallow and insincere she really is.....But I suppose aren't they all.
Don't get me wrong some girls have been hot, one that springs to mind is Jessica Kelly. But for some reasons only known to the fools that run the station, they are fucked off. And in their wisdom they bring in girls from the past.......And I have also got a well known theory on why that should be....it can only be the casting couch syndrome at work. Oh yes,and free pies supplied. |
|
|
|
|
AniseedBalls, I do think you make a lot of good salient points on the subject regarding the models on The babe channels and I take your views on board. However, I wouldn't call girls like Nicole, Lori, Olivia, Alexa, and Jada as unglamourous. Even though it's frustrating watching them putting on poor performances these days because of the restraints put upon them, I do think they are the only models that do have sex appeal, at least for me, any way
![]() ![]() |
|
|
I guess it's a combination of both. I don't suppose they have proper "cameramen" now except for the POV sessions. Most sets seem to have an automated camera setup probable controled by one person sat in a control room shouting at the floor producer(s) if a babe is getting too risque. Maybe they have one for each camera, who knows unless you work there?
I don't think we can expect good camera angles for most sessions, especially for new, inexperienced girls. Just look at what some experienced babes get away with though, it's Lori at the moment while Nicole seems very heavily tamed and censored, considering her experience. Having said all that, the one person I would like to see shot is the POV cameraman, who is an absolute moron. There is no point having these sessions if all he/she films is the top half or head and most of the wall behind! And that's even when the babe still has her knickers on! Surely they can practice and co-ordinate the routine so that a fair amount of "downstairs" is shown with a naked babe, without risking showing too much? Producing a sensual and exciting "tease" isn't rocket science or difficult; it just takes a bit of effort and common sense, two things sadly lacking in babeshow producers these days. |
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I guess my real anger for the awful camera angles should really be aimed towards the producers, Scottishbloke and not the cameramen. I guess they have to do as they're told. The worse thing that's happened to Babestation is this reliance of the perv cam in order to make and fleece the gullible public with not very flattering shots of a girls' pussy either because it's out of focus or the cam is far to near(as was once said by someone, "I want to put a face to the pussy.")
![]() ![]() |
|
|
It as to be said, a big percentage of the babestation girls are massively over weight. Last night joined by another "passed her best" model Lucy, who as certainly been putting away the pies recently.
And please don't anyone say that they like a bit of something to grab onto. These are glamour models so called. And I don't want them showing off their extra pounds on my tv thank you..... If I want to see excess fat, I'll hang about outside the ladies changing rooms at any Primark store. I have said this many times on here. I wouldn't class one babestation girl, not even one to be anything remotely like glamorous. |
|
|