| Autor | Beiträge |
|---|---|
|
|
MisterWayne wrote:So I ask Ju and If that is so, be prepaired fellow members for an average show 
|
|
|
|
|
|
So I ask Ju and
Hans will be the director of the ETV-Birthday-Show and Zia is the German Moderator. Greets |
|
|
|
|
Sandra will be the director of the evening show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rialpka wrote:So, when he did a good job we can say the name, but when his work is bad we cannot say it? if a name was said on the micro in public it's ok to write the name (independent of good or bad work). if the name was said only on the telephone in private (the opposite of public) the name shouldn't be writen here. |
|
|
|
|
|
So, when he did a good job we can say the name, but when his work is bad we cannot say it?
It is no secret. |
|
|
|
|
|
rialpka wrote:G... the operator of Friday Try Joro and everybody will know whom you're talking about. |
|
|
|
|
|
@ Peppers,
You can add friday he was the DJ too. |
|
|
|
|
|
This picture is old, made in the good old times when everything was controled manually. Maybe they still use the same keyboard until now, but I believe the whole system was already updated and the computer switching option is now included too. At least I can't imagin anyone who is able every night to push one single button every 15 seconds for 5 hours without any cigaret or toilet break. This man would go crazy after a few nights (hmmm.. maybe that's exactly what already happened).
Anyway, controled manually or by a computer, it does not matter, if all this chaos is made by this one person, why there is a director and what is his role? Why there are no orders from him/her where and when to push which button. This operator man is totally out of control, allowed to destroy what he wants and nobody (the director included) cares. Or is the director blind and doesn't see that? |
|
|
|
|
|
[...)
so no computer switching, just a nervous or bored operator.[/quote] G... the operator of Friday as often is particularly nervous when he sees Scarlet and why just Scarlet. No problem for him, he sees Scarlet without cuts no matter if he cuts her image for us in the point to be one mile-feuilles(sheet). |
|
|
|
|
|
zorgaux wrote:The switch should allow viewers to see the highlights, but the best moments that are deleted by the operator complete agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
pepers wrote:I guess the button is pushed by an automat machine with random time intervals. That's why many times the camera switches in the moments when nobody expects that (even the models or regie). Sure the automat is much easier and more comfortable solution for the person who operates that. I also guess the man can always turn the automat off when the situation needs it (a model solo strip, shower show etc.), but... he is lazy to turn it off (or maybe is sleeping?) The video mixing equipment (picture from mic02 1st b-day party video part3 7:22, thanks to elmo for the hint). [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig] upper row: effects on switch lower 2 rows: buttons to choose a camera under his hand is a switch to switch between the lower two rows the row the switch is at determins which cameras pic is shown, in the other row you can prechoose a camera to switch too with the effect you choose in the top row. It's still the same vision mixer today. Best Russian pre war equipment and undestroyable even for the staff operating it (and that means a lot ...) so no computer switching, just a nervous or bored operator. |
|
|
|
|
Chelsea said Janine will be the director of the party show tomorrow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janine will be the director of the Evening Show
|
|
|
|
|
|
I guess the button is pushed by an automat machine with random time intervals. That's why many times the camera switches in the moments when nobody expects that (even the models or regie). Sure the automat is much easier and more comfortable solution for the person who operates that. I also guess the man can always turn the automat off when the situation needs it (a model solo strip, shower show etc.), but... he is lazy to turn it off (or maybe is sleeping?)
In the past years there was no automat machine and it was all operated manually. Sometimes the man was also lazy and sleeping, that's why we were able to see 10 and even more minutes of uninterrupted time with camera focusing to one model. It sucked too, but at the end it wasn't so bad for watching. But the current situation is really tragical. The regular 10 to 20 seconds of chaotic switching kills soon any erotic atmosphere and burries any good ideas and any efford of models to make something interesting, because despite all the efford, due the bad camera operating it's all unwatchable! |
|
|
|
|
|
rialpka wrote:Dear Vappiano, Thanks dear Rialpka .A gift for that boy: [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig] |
|
|
