Eurotic's website & webstream

WOW, In my opinion Lauren just did the best show of ETV till now.
I'm glad I did not miss that.

sometimes I think they exactly know what they do and produce this shitty quality fully intended . . as a part of their total censorship. At least I am convinced the bad light and for sure the stupid fog is only there for this reasons, dont show a little bit too much, under no circumstances.

It is a farce . . . they take real euros but only offer crippled content

Thats it now, I am low on credits and I dont fill them up again. They got too much money for nothing from me already

The next time I call Alice I'm going to ask her to engage in some industrial sabotage for me. I'm sure she'll be up for it. I'm going to ask her to cut the plug off the end of that bloody smoke machine, or failing that, to take it to the top floor of the building and throw it off! It may look wonderful if you are in the studio, 2 metres from the model but it looks fucking shit to anyone paying for and watching the live stream when Flowplayer turns the 'misty mystique' into a Lego brick version of the show!

Lauren is being incredible, by the way! She has attained and sometimes surpassed 'Gia-Like' levels of sensuality and eroticism already, in the short time she's been at ETV and the 20 minutes she's been in this Premium show so far.

Dreamlander

EDIT: More smoke, more lights, more shadow and the stream struggled to cope but it's a testament to the abilities of Lauren that most of those issues were forgotten. She is something so special! I mentioned Gia but there's also elements of Scarlet in Lauren's performances. I shouldn't compare though. Lauren is Lauren and she is amazing. She performs for YOU, only YOU and having that skill to beguil is rare indeed.

Dreamlander wrote:Well, the heady days of earlier in the week of a steady, watchable stream do seem to be behind us. I only really wanted to watch one Premium today and it was the one currently running with lovely Alice. I say 'running', it only started a few minutes ago, about 9 minutes late and only runs for a few seconds at a time before repeatedly pausing with added pixelation for good measure. If you do somethng 12 times a day, for over 6 months, surely you know everything that could possibly go wrong or right with it by now and be able to produce a perfect stream, time after time? Surely? I may just start watching them the day after broadcast because this is no fun at all and eroticism is the last thing on my mind when trying to watch.

I don't know if anyone else experienced the same issues but Alice was onscreen for under 10 minutes as the stream never caught up before the red curtain reappeared!

Dreamlander

I have the Ginger & Kelly Show seen today. For so many pixels even 1 cent is still too expensive. I am very disappointed.

Well, the heady days of earlier in the week of a steady, watchable stream do seem to be behind us. I only really wanted to watch one Premium today and it was the one currently running with lovely Alice. I say 'running', it only started a few minutes ago, about 9 minutes late and only runs for a few seconds at a time before repeatedly pausing with added pixelation for good measure. If you do somethng 12 times a day, for over 6 months, surely you know everything that could possibly go wrong or right with it by now and be able to produce a perfect stream, time after time? Surely? I may just start watching them the day after broadcast because this is no fun at all and eroticism is the last thing on my mind when trying to watch.

I don't know if anyone else experienced the same issues but Alice was onscreen for under 10 minutes as the stream never caught up before the red curtain reappeared!

Dreamlander

Dreamlander wrote:. . .snip

. . . Unfortunately, Kelly is the 'wrong twin' I had hoped for a better performance but it was quite emotionless. It's not just because she doesn't get naked but she doesn't engage the viewer like Dacota does. There's no real twinkle in her eye like she wants to get your pulse racing.

snip . . .

Maybe Kelly needs some nightshows to get more comfortable. Dakota already made 4 nightshows and gets more relaxed and active every time, Kelly had non yet

I think that is the reason for the unequal development of the twins . . . the experienced hotties of the night are for sure better teachers compared with the daytime softies

pepe84 wrote:Hi Dreamlander,

you better did not praise them for their technicnal quality . . calliing it a desaster is not enough to describe what is going on right now. I feel really sad for the poor Kelly, "presented" by braindead botchers, she would deserve much better, and of course all other models, too.

edit: quality got a bit better after 15 min, without the use of fog, but still not really good . . . and sadly Kelly is really disappointing me, very nice, but no spice or pep at all

Yeah, it didn't start well, technically. The lights were still present pointing at the camera but at least they weren't pulsing. The smoke too didn't, and never, helps. They must just watch it live and never, ever give a thought to how the stream looks...or just don't care. It was also too dark again but the quality was surprisingly good later on considering what it had to deal with really. Unfortunately, Kelly is the 'wrong twin' I had hoped for a better performance but it was quite emotionless. It's not just because she doesn't get naked but she doesn't engage the viewer like Dacota does. There's no real twinkle in her eye like she wants to get your pulse racing. I have no idea who was directing but they didn't use Kelly to the best of her abilities for a girl who is still a 'newbie'. I'm sure there's a sexy performance waiting to burst out of her.
There aren't many girls who can captivate for a full hour though with such a limited scope or theme. We do have Lauren to look forward to tomorrow and she could keep anyone watching all day, even if she was trapped in a potato sack! Oops, I'd better not give Angelina any ideas!

Dreamlander

Hi Dreamlander,

you better did not praise them for their technicnal quality . . calliing it a desaster is not enough to describe what is going on right now. I feel really sad for the poor Kelly, "presented" by braindead botchers, she would deserve much better, and of course all other models, too.

edit: quality got a bit better after 15 min, without the use of fog, but still not really good . . . and sadly Kelly is really disappointing me, very nice, but no spice or pep at all

I sent this to 'The Wall' yesterday evening, before White's Premium show. It hasn't been posted, yet comments about her show have, so I'm assuming there's something about it they didn't like. I actually consider it to be very honest and positive.
Here it is:

I'd just like to commend you on the superb picture quality of the live shows today. I watched the last 5 with Suzy, Dacota, Melanie and Molly and they were greatly enhanced in level of enjoyment because of the excellent picture quality. I have, in the last few weeks, noticed a drop in the picture quality of the live DPS shows. I watch quite a few of them so can make a fair assessment and have had similar feedback from other viewers too. Recent shows have suffered from terrible pixelation and 'blocking', especially in close-up, which has spoiled the beautiful performances of the girls and the efforts of those behind the cameras to make a truly erotic show. I've had to wait until the next day to view a good quality version which is not long to wait, I know, but then the sense of the unknown, of any real surprises is gone from the live broadcast show, for me when viewed as a recording.
Anyway, enough about the past. Hopefully, whatever you are doing differently, higher bitrate maybe?, continues because these little 15-minute gems of shows really deserve it!

Dreamlander

Nothing objectionable, is there? Perhaps it's because my nickname just isn't Italian enough!

Dreamlander

EDIT: I've changed the 'bold' section of my message to show which part of it ETV chose to publish. I knew there was a reason I gave up sending anything constructive to that place. Best leave it to the same 3 or 4 guys who always post there in blind adulation, adding nothing to the advancement and development of ETV as a unique, high quality erotic channel. 'The Wall' serves no real purpose at all to the paying customer or to ETV itself in the long term.

Wilsonsand wrote:After the DPS of today with Jasmine and Molly i wonder who is it possible the girls made solo premium shows suitable even for little children (not even bras: tops) and Jasmine did hairbra and handbra in ELS and Molly did handbra with several nipple oopses ( i remember she showed her nipples before). Sometimes i think the premium shows are the last thing on the list.

Probably many customers are little children.

After the DPS of today with Jasmine and Molly i wonder who is it possible the girls made solo premium shows suitable even for little children (not even bras: tops) and Jasmine did hairbra and handbra in ELS and Molly did handbra with several nipple oopses ( i remember she showed her nipples before). Sometimes i think the premium shows are the last thing on the list.

Wilsonsand wrote:dreamlander, the questions is ...how long?

i told you. Not even a single day.

Dreamlander wrote:...
Yeah, those lights are properly buggering up the picture quality! This is not a technical problem though, this is someone who should know better about the limits of the streaming hardware/software, trying to make a type of show that the stream could never handle. In fact, most broadcast quality TV cameras cannot deal with direct LED lighting!
...

low-brow, that's art
Just kidding, maybe they should occasionally watch their own program
Probably with the uncompressed HD quality on the studio equipment that may even work, but after compression only artefacts remain .
Or it simply is too distracting

Regards
Joker

vector wrote:I just see White with ice cubes in panties. But the pixels are back. The joy was short-lived. That means for me: They can do it better but they do not want.

do they ever watch their own shows? just for quality control? I dont think so, they always make the same mistakes, again and again . . .

the few times they produce good technical quality it seems to be like rare unintended accidents

vector wrote:I just see White with ice cubes in panties. But the pixels are back. The joy was short-lived. That means for me: They can do it better but they do not want.

Yeah, those lights are properly buggering up the picture quality! This is not a technical problem though, this is someone who should know better about the limits of the streaming hardware/software, trying to make a type of show that the stream could never handle. In fact, most broadcast quality TV cameras cannot deal with direct LED lighting!
Disappointing again because we should be writing about lovely White and about her performance but yet again, it's the picture quality, or lack of it, that draws our attention.

Dreamlander