Eurotic's website & webstream

Half-hour passed very quickly Jasmin & Rebeka. They showed that the maximum they can now.
Jasmine's a good sparring partner for Rebekah.

Slowfox wrote:As little as I saw of her and/or any of the shows, I always get the impression she has an exhibitionistic urge and as such is pushing herself in front of all and to the detriment of all and everything.

I didnt see last nights show, but what you call her exhibitionistic urge is exactly the reason why I like her. I wish many more of eurotic models would have this attitude.

Slowfox wrote:A little more reservation would likely do wonders to her, the shows and also her colleagues, as once she starts to freak out she is uncontollable, rough and apparently also rude.

With a little more reservation she would be as boring as the majority of the other models are. Rough and rude? The little Selena? Come on . . .

You cant blame the most active model for the bad and lazy performances of most of her colleagues.

Dreamlander wrote:... about the premium show, the ETV wall and Sellena ...

Am just referring to Sellena which may already be the core of the issue. As little as I saw of her and/or any of the shows, I always get the impression she has an exhibitionistic urge and as such is pushing herself in front of all and to the detriment of all and everything.

A little more reservation would likely do wonders to her, the shows and also her colleagues, as once she starts to freak out she is uncontollable, rough and apparently also rude.

Dreamlander wrote:Well, so far, of the four models, Sellena is getting nearly all the camera time. Hard to see if Sugar is there and White and Suzy are just extras. One hour to go though.

Dreamlander

Edit: Not much difference in the last hour. If anything, more of an anticlimax. Definitely a case of 'Sellena & Friends. I'm not knocking Sellena, she's a great performer but she doesn't turn me on but that doesn't matter as there were 4 girls and I should have had the other 75% of the cast to do that for me but three of the hottest models at ETV just didn't get the camera time or any inspiring direction to do so.
I wonder if a complaint to the Wall will get another 'retry' like before? Well, I have to be up for work in 4 hours and can't really be bothered to post this time. Disappointing.

Edit 2: Stayed up a few extra minutes to write to the Wall. I'd say it was entirely constructive and not abusive at all but, if it isn't posted, I'll put it here so you can be the judges.

It seems 'they' decided not to post my comment about the show last night. Here it is in full for you to judge for yourselves, as promised. You will find nothing nasty, abusive or rude within it. Obviously, though 'someone' at ETV found it objectionable. It was just my personal opinion, I really don't see what the problem is.

Well, I have to admit, I'm disappointed with the show tonight. Four of ETV's hottest models should have guaranteed my satisfaction, but it didn't. I'm not normally someone who purchases multi-girl shows but after Suzy's recent incredible Premium shows, one of which included Sugar, who was here too tonight, I thought I couldn't lose.
What I saw before me though was more a 'Sellena & Friends' Premium. She was the focus for the majority of the 180 minutes. Now, I cannot criticise her, she is always such a superb performer but not a girl who is one of my favourites. In a multi-girl format though, this is not a problem as there are three other girls to share the bill. This didn't seem to happen though as they had less camera time, Sugar especially seemed invisible for a lot of the show and White was mainly in the background or to the side. My favourite of the four, Suzy, also appeared to be just an extra in the show to play along with anything Sellena was doing.
I can only assume that the director was at fault for this apparent lack of equality amongst the girls. Taking the easy option of focusing on a girl like Sellena who needs little or no encouragement made the show suffer, as a whole, in my opinion. Whereas a little more thought for the roles the other girls could play would have elevated this show immeasurably. Afterall, there were 4 'hot' models in the show, no so-called 'soft' models to negotiate with. Regardless of their differing limits, which I respect, they all deserved an equal share of camera time and inspiring direction to showcase their talents, which we all know they have.
I am one of those rare guys who doesn't chase every millimetre of bare skin but I just want to see all the models given an equal chance to show what they can do and I feel this did not happen tonight. An opportunity missed, in my opinion, with the high calibre of the models in the show.

Dreamlander


If you've ever read my glowing comments on 'The Wall' I hope you can see I'm not just heaping praise on them, it's just that posts like those above don't get posted. I'm sure most of you realise the true purpose of 'The Wall'. If you didn't, you do now.
I've often questioned the validity of many of the posts there. The nicknames don't seem to match many of those who post here. There can be reasons for this, I understand, but I like to keep transparency and keep the name 'Dreamlander' wherever I comment.

Dreamlander

pepe84 wrote:

Watcher wrote:When did you give up, last night? ... [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig] is a bit of a give-away ...

I have no idea what you mean . . . and I really dont care, you are always off-topic anyway. Seems every forum needs a troll

Okay, so I'll explain it for you:-

On 24.09.2014, that's one week ago, you decided that ETV did not give you what you want yet your still complaining ...

Why don't you have the courage of your convictions and give up on ETV?
You don't need the approval or backing of others, just do it!

Tendertony wrote:Now I'm a bit confused....
Many of you and those on the ETV-wall (maybe it's also some of you ) say the show of Kristina, Tia, Lauren and Dacota was one of the hottest ever made.
But according to some remarks "in subordinate sentences" or openly stated in Fabri d's contribution it still could have been hotter... Again they seem to have fallen back into censorship of moving the camera away when it was getting too hot.
And the reason? See their answer to Fabri's message:
>>Neither the models, nor the production team would like to show some things which are beyond the aesthetic taste we’d like to maintain. We had the choice to either drop the curtain to those scenes or move the camera away<<
Aha, so the models do not want that it is shown what they do in front of the camera! Now it is clear
Real erotic is "beyond the aesthetic taste we'd like to maintain"
But why is it sometimes (very rarely) still possible? There are scenes with girls tongue kisses in some videos!

Sorry to say, but the'll never learn.
I will thoroughly think about buying new credits after my current stock is used.

Shouldn't we all go into strike for one week or so?

I don't think a strike is a good idea because they won't notice, what are we looking for a charter of rights pay if you want to complain. ha ha
The answer they gave to Fabio is not good for them, their own censorship they say and expects payment then.
Should they bring the curtain down on the whole web project since they can not cut it and put more effort in to night shows, a lot of viewers are pissed off with their hot shows
hot shows like they say turn the lights down and flash the camera , that's where the word hot
I say two years strike and then maybe.

Watcher wrote:When did you give up, last night? ... [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig] is a bit of a give-away ...

I have no idea what you mean . . . and I really dont care, you are always off-topic anyway. Seems every forum needs a troll

pepe84 wrote:

Watcher wrote:

pepe84 wrote:

Tendertony wrote:. . .snip . . .

Shouldn't we all go into strike for one week or so?

I am on "strike" already, but not only for a week . . . when they dont stop their stupid ideology of total censorship they will not get a single cent from me in the future. Real euros for crippled shows? No way!

... But you're still watching? ...

No, not anymore . . . why do you think so?

Read my last posts [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig] and [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig].

I still have some credits left, no idea what to do with them, and I will defintely not fill them up again. The ripoff was done as I bought them, I got absolutely nothing in return. I hoped to get something better as in the TV-shows, maybe a bit more spice like in the good old times, but the censorship in the web is even worse as it is in the nightshows.

If I knew before what a crap they offer in the web I never had subscribed, it simply has no value at all.

When did you give up, last night? ... [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig] is a bit of a give-away ...

Watcher wrote:. . . snip . . .

... But you're still watching? ...

No, not anymore . . . why do you think so?

Read my last posts [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig] and [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig].

I still have some credits left, no idea what to do with them, and I will defintely not fill them up again. The ripoff was done as I bought them, I got absolutely nothing in return. I hoped to get something better as in the TV-shows, maybe a bit more spice like in the good old times, but the censorship in the web is even worse as it is in the nightshows.

If I knew before what a crap they offer in the web I never had subscribed, it simply has no value at all.

pepe84 wrote:

Tendertony wrote:. . .snip . . .

Shouldn't we all go into strike for one week or so?

I am on "strike" already, but not only for a week . . . when they dont stop their stupid ideology of total censorship they will not get a single cent from me in the future. Real euros for crippled shows? No way!

... But you're still watching? ...

Tendertony wrote:. . .snip . . .

Shouldn't we all go into strike for one week or so?

I am on "strike" already, but not only for a week . . . when they dont stop their stupid ideology of total censorship they will not get a single cent from me in the future. Real euros for crippled shows? No way!

Now I'm a bit confused....
Many of you and those on the ETV-wall (maybe it's also some of you ) say the show of Kristina, Tia, Lauren and Dacota was one of the hottest ever made.
But according to some remarks "in subordinate sentences" or openly stated in Fabri d's contribution it still could have been hotter... Again they seem to have fallen back into censorship of moving the camera away when it was getting too hot.
And the reason? See their answer to Fabri's message:
>>Neither the models, nor the production team would like to show some things which are beyond the aesthetic taste we’d like to maintain. We had the choice to either drop the curtain to those scenes or move the camera away<<
Aha, so the models do not want that it is shown what they do in front of the camera! Now it is clear
Real erotic is "beyond the aesthetic taste we'd like to maintain"
But why is it sometimes (very rarely) still possible? There are scenes with girls tongue kisses in some videos!

Sorry to say, but the'll never learn.
I will thoroughly think about buying new credits after my current stock is used.

Shouldn't we all go into strike for one week or so?

Well, so far, of the four models, Sellena is getting nearly all the camera time. Hard to see if Sugar is there and White and Suzy are just extras. One hour to go though.

Dreamlander

Edit: Not much difference in the last hour. If anything, more of an anticlimax. Definitely a case of 'Sellena & Friends. I'm not knocking Sellena, she's a great performer but she doesn't turn me on but that doesn't matter as there were 4 girls and I should have had the other 75% of the cast to do that for me but three of the hottest models at ETV just didn't get the camera time or any inspiring direction to do so.
I wonder if a complaint to the Wall will get another 'retry' like before? Well, I have to be up for work in 4 hours and can't really be bothered to post this time. Disappointing.

Edit 2: Stayed up a few extra minutes to write to the Wall. I'd say it was entirely constructive and not abusive at all but, if it isn't posted, I'll put it here so you can be the judges.

vector wrote:I would like to join my previous speakers.

1) This was an unexpectedly good show.
2) The girls have not smoked for three hours.

This is very good news, thank you for this information. I felt certain that it would happen in a three hour show, because I know at least three of the girls are smokers so I respect and I'm grateful for their decision not to show it onscreen.
I'm tempted to watch tonight's show now. I'm only really interested in Suzy, but she's been so superb since her return and worked very well with Sugar lately. The other two girls always give hot performances too and all four are what I would call 'nice' girls, not liable to dominate or overpower each other. It could be a sexy and sensual show. I'll see if my 'clicking' finger gets itchy around 7pm!

Dreamlander

I would like to join my previous speakers.

1) This was an unexpectedly good show.
2) The girls have not smoked for three hours.