Web and Sat: technical aspects, censorship and economical strate

I think that a specific section for these subjects can be useful.
Why these subjects in a single thread?
Because I think that there's a correlation among them.
Moreover, these aspects have a specific influence on the the quality of the fta content.

It's clear, I can be wrong by making these assumptions, so everyone can express here his/her own point of view.
I start with my personal one.


1) Web and sat streams:

During July 2014 I noticed that:
- The sat stream suffered from some "video blocks".
- During the same days, sometimes the web stream showed a black screen.

During that period the sat stream had the usual 720x576 Pal resolution,
while the web stream had a 1024x576 resolution, which showed a good image quality.
Moreover, the web stream had a great value: it was deprived of the tons of numbers which cover the sat stream.

Now the technical problems seem to have been solved, but they have been solved in a very poor way:
the sat stream is always the same, but the web stream is drammatically worse.
Technical settings for the webstream are always the same (1024x576, 25 fps),
but it seems to me that it's a "fake" resolution, due to a stupid video upscale:

sat stream (720x576, mpeg2 1650 kbps) + upscale to 1024x576 + compression to AVC mp4 (1100 kbps).

This hypotesis seems to be confirmed by the fact that now even the web stream shows all the numbers that cover the screen.
A very bad and useless solution, because if you watch the web stream, you can see the numbers on the web page,
so you don't need any "invasion" of numbers on the stream.

Personal conclusion: it seems to be a poor strategy to spare money.



2) Censorship and economical strategy:

the content is very variable, from period to period.
So it's quite evident that there's a "self-censorship" on the content, the same strategy used on eUrotic TV.
During the last weeks they have reached a ridicolous level.

Personal conclusion: it seems another poor strategy to make extra money, by reducing the good content from fta, in order to make a promotion of the ppv content.



At the end of these analisys it seems that BS24 has been following the same strategies of eUrotic.
Maybe a common strategist for these 2 channels ?

Web and Sat Stream:

I can"t tell about the Webstream because I only watch the Satstream and the quality is okay for me.
Sometimes they had problems with freezing, but actually it seems to be good.

Censorship:
Thats the big brakepoint!!
I find this ridicoulus since years.
They changed the censorship so often and under 50 Shows are 2-3 good Shows.
Thats irritating and make a bad mood.
It"s also bad for the callers because in one night they can see a good show for her money and in the next it"s worst.
And it"s not dependent from girl to girl, because you see for example Viper with good shows 2 Month back and now she is boring.
Lola is actually better than the years before (exception her beginning) and Sally is more and more soft, too.

Girls like Patty,Amira,Lejla etc. are Pornactress or nearly by this, and they are so careful in the show.
Everything comes from the producers and the camerawork is also between good and super bad.

I hope they changed their strategy in my opinion Eurotic is in kind of FTA more relaxed than BS24.

The personal thing and strate is bad, too.
The not so good and very soft girls are often hours longer on the bed in more in the focus that the good girls.
Camerawork is bad.
In the show I have often the feeling that the girls don"t know exactly what they can do and what not.
It"s a irritating leadership on BS24 and I hope that changed in future!!!!

All in all BS24 had good scope but don"t use it and they are only have so much callers because they hasn"t good rivals.
But in my perceive the number of callers are more less than 6-8 month before.