| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
If you will forgive me morningstar I will keep this brief as I am not long home from nightshift and I really need to get some sleep. The upshot about the entire Bluebird debacle is a very complicated story which I will go into more detail in a future post. Firstly with regards to the initial response when Bluebird went to air. At the time back in 2010 we were really spoilt for choice and it was very easy to be critical of any new show especially if they didn't match the level of titillation that the other ones were at that time. I was one of those members who was also very quick to leap on the bandwagon and vent my frustration at the opening night launch of the channels. Would I do similar now if 6 new FTA channels were to suddenly appear on the Adult EPG, probably not as I would just be glad of having more choice. As I said when Bluebird launched the existing channels were very strong in an era when it was very fashionable to stick 2 fingers right up at ofcom. I seem to recall Amanda Rendal getting on the mic and saying fuck ofcom. How times have changed
|
|
|
|
|
Oh look! Its Danni Harwood and one of the twins. Its deja vu all over again. I have to say that things were a lot more interesting when Bluebird had a channel. They seemed to push the envelope that forced the others to follow suit. Can anyone remind me why Bluebird was so hated by people on these forums (not necessarily this one)? I seem to recall that in the other forum you weren't even allowed by some to mention it by name. Now, excuse me, but at one stage Bluebird had Lynsey, Sammie, Kitty Lea and even got a couple of other crackers to ride the devils whip. Who could ask for more? Whether they took it too far and were closed down by the powers that be, or whatever, that doesn't get away from the fact that a lot of people on the forum were happy to see it go. Hmmm! What does that imply to me? Maybe I'm stupid but do the people who run it have vested interests in how much or what competition should be allowed? Maybe its the same on here as well. Who knows? My point is that Babestation currently get, lets say, twenty callers for the two I mentioned at the start, (the same twenty every day or every few days on rotation). Then a new station starts and gets all the sexiest babes to put on proper shows and maybe even the chance of seeing them in an old film or two getting a right jolly rogering for the enjoyment of the rest of us. I know where fifteen of those twenty callers will go let alone countless viewers.
Set me straight if you wish. I'm not normally a conspiracy theorist but I understand business enough to know that the channels would be mad not to have a few agents dotted around these forums to try to set their agenda. |
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #745 Last edited: 24.08.2017, 00:16 23.08.2017, 22:20 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Tates? Anyone like potates? Tatoes? Taters? Anyone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #744 Last edited: 23.08.2017, 20:05 23.08.2017, 19:59 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussioneddiemonsoon wrote:last visit 18.41 post here at 18.44. it's not my fault you don't know whether you're coming or going. oh and once again i'm not the one throwing insults around. you're stupidity is an insult. i'm not skully. don't know him and as far as i can tell we don;'t even live on the same island, a fact which the mods on here can confirm for you (if he even has an active account). but i'm going to hazard a guess and predict that if you keep it up you'll end up banned from here as well, so it's all moot. |
|
|
|
|
|
last visit 18.41 post here at 18.44. it's not my fault you don't know whether you're coming or going. oh and once again i'm not the one throwing insults around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
eddiemonsoon wrote:i'm the person who watched you log in over there at 18.34 two minutes after you made your post. log in where? wtf are you talking about? your not still on this skully bullshit. fuck you're dumb. |
|
|
|
|
|
i'm the person who watched you log in over there at 18.34 two minutes after you made your post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
eddiemonsoon wrote:nice to see you logging in somewhere else within 15 minutes again mate. How come you only post to troll the people you know to have been banned elsewhere? you even keep changing your avatar to troll people. Surely you're aware that after six years old it's illegal to change your supporting allegiances. but we've had liverpool>hamilton>dundee. Maybe you know someone who moved from liverpool to scotland, I do. 99% of your posts are a reference to one of us or an insult. Are you missing us? sorry, who are you again? |
|
|
|
|
Scarlett is supposed to be on tonight, and yet she's not on the schedule. Hopefully if she is on, she's not stuck in the corner while fully clothed and twirling her hair out of boredom like last time.
With Priya, Lexi, Jenna and Danni on, I can't see the sexually biased producers letting Scarlett do a good session. In a better world, Scarlett would be doing nude POVs, handthong and more. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #738 Last edited: 23.08.2017, 19:11 23.08.2017, 19:06 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
nice to see you logging in somewhere else within 15 minutes again mate. How come you only post to troll the people you know to have been banned elsewhere? you even keep changing your avatar to troll people. Surely you're aware that after six years old it's illegal to change your supporting allegiances. but we've had liverpool>hamilton>dundee. Maybe you know someone who moved from liverpool to scotland, I do. 99% of your posts are a reference to one of us or an insult. Are you missing us?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scottishbloke wrote:AniseedBalls I assume you are making reference to my ugly bloke clip. It was intended as a bit of banter, my focus was on this guy turning down an incredibly hot model and I pictured you doing likewise based on your post when you said that not one single channel had an attractive model on it. I thought obviously you must be a hard man to please. The ugly bloke clip which I selected was the only one I could find that might have any relevance as to the scenario but it could have been any clip if I'd come across something of a similar stance or better of a hot model being turned down. I thought you would have realised this was only banter. Sorry if you took the joke the wrong way. No offence intended nice to see you making friends as usual mate. |
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #736 Last edited: 23.08.2017, 18:12 23.08.2017, 18:10 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
AniseedBalls I assume you are making reference to my ugly bloke clip. It was intended as a bit of banter, my focus was on this guy turning down an incredibly hot model and I pictured you doing likewise based on your post when you said that not one single channel had an attractive model on it. I thought obviously you must be a hard man to please. The ugly bloke clip which I selected was the only one I could find that might have any relevance as to the scenario but it could have been any clip if I'd come across something of a similar stance or better of a hot model being turned down. I thought you would have realised this was only banter. Sorry if you took the joke the wrong way. No offence intended
Afterall I have no idea what you look like so how could I possibly come to such a judgement  Have a beer and chill mate - It's all good 
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know if Scottishbloke is being serious with me. He is being very mean and cruel if he is. Please don't be like that Scottishbloke. We should all be friends together on here. After all i wouldn't dream of saying anything unpleasant to anyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So lousy has the show become that we now have to put up with Mia who put on a dayshow and more like her will follow that I am sure of
 not once did she even attempt to go topless. Fully dressed the entire night. Why then was her show labelled as 18+ Yet again with regards to the others, couldn't see a damn thing as the camera was panned right at the top half only. Surely they can't be pulling in that many punters with this shambles. Are we really to believe that this is all down to ofcom. Out of all the channels the only solitary decent stint came from Lola last night on Studio66, not exactly vintage but unlike Babestation we were able to see a full shot of her super fit body. I don't know what has happened to Xpanded in recent time but it has tamed right down. Only a few months ago Amanda Rendal was practically going full frontal. It's just all beginning to look at bit grim 
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #733 Last edited: 23.08.2017, 01:09 23.08.2017, 00:25 Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Sorry All.....
 Beer, frankie boyle dvd's and a babe channel forum do not mix. update: I have deleted said posts...
|
|
|
|
Welcome Guest. Login | (Time: 09.05.2025, 20:42)
- Liveshow-TV.com
- » Liveshow-TV.com Forum
- » UK Liveshows
- » BabeStation TV
- » Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
