Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

4.86 (7 rating(s))

(4.86 / 5, 7 ratings)

Author Posts

22.08.2017, 22:40

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

I see last night Babestation brought out the shower set, shame I couldn't see fuck all despite Lori being naked, it was mostly close ups of her face grimacing fake orgasm expressions which was overbearing. Then we had Sophie next, she kept her panties on and was equally as fake. Comments on another forum I have read elsewhere would suggest that it was a resounding success. Shame that place no longer has members brave enough to tell other members that they are talking directly right out of there arse Cool

21.08.2017, 23:26

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Beth reminds me of a bloke I used to work with. He never refused overtime either.

21.08.2017, 22:51

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

AniseedBalls I used Caty Cole as one example of many, lets cut the shit here. We all watch the channels which includes yourself because the women that do them are really attractive. Some aren't to my tastes but apart from a few old grannys, aswell as a few slightly overweight models which I won't name Blush and the Bangkok Ladyboys the majority of these women I would be more than happy to smash their back doors in Tongue

Tell us all exactly what is is you are looking for because some of the models on these channels are your typical girl next door types. You say that most of them have implants and this puts you off. I can name a few that are natural starting with Clare Richards but I suppose in your eyes she just isn't good looking enough for you. You remind me a lot of this guy, is it you!

21.08.2017, 16:19

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

I understand why you think the likes of Caty Cole are attractive SB. But attractive to you is different from what it is to me. First of all there is Caty's tits, completely unnatural looking and placed way to high on her chest. Fuck me, if she was ever to give birth, the baby would have to sit on her fucking shoulder to feed...... And secondly, even more annoying, is that fucking infantile voice of hers. Why does she insist on wanting to sound like a three year old........ Other than those two things she ain't that bad.........

21.08.2017, 08:39

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

There's a lot of girls who you'd suspect have seen the 'mannequins' and 'producer's favourites' get away with shit shows week after week and thought fuck it why should i put any effort in.

There's also a lot of girls who see 'foot fetish' as the easy option. take your shoes off, wiggle your feet, perma-grin one expression fits all (michelle moist), ooh ahh a couple of times job done.

and then there's the domme shows which if you look like a fucking librarian or an extra from a harry potter movie are never going to work.

20.08.2017, 23:43

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

AniseedBalls wrote:I like attractive girls, of which the babechannels have none.

What..................I know we all have differing opinions on the shows and the models who continue to let us down but if Caty Cole and Jennifer Jade were to come knocking on my front door I would be delighted to welcome them in. Sure not all the girls are as stunning across the entire board but for you to suggest that not one single babe channel has one attractive model is truly beyond belief.

As most people know I work a lot of nightshifts in my line of work but I will set a few of the channels to record in my absence just incase I miss the one night when they are firing on all cylinders. The closest I've seen lately to a passable show was the night Lexi Lowe and Jenna Hoskins were on although Danni Harwood is also something of a dark horse as every now and again she might do something special. These 3 are the only ones I have seen the past few weeks putting on anything which I could constitute as attempting to do something that might raise a smile or 2 in us.

As for Ashley Emma, yip, she has been doing the same tired routine for months now, sure it was a novelty the first time she went naked after spending so long teasing us that she might but wouldn't. The gushing praise on her and others who do similar is completely disproportionate and has me reaching for the vomit bucket every time Smile

20.08.2017, 22:49

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

dogman wrote:I like Ella Jolie,i think she is good looking and cuteHeart,sorry but some things need to be said and i don't care so there.Also think it's a bloody good idea of B/S to hide some of their girls behind a sheet,easier on the eye.

I wish Ella was on BS so they could keep her behind the curtain permanently

20.08.2017, 20:42

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Cali Garcia is behind said curtain as I type. I think its an audition for Saudi Babestation. Its a shame because she is probably the most beautiful girl to ever be on these shows but another none entity in the chemistry stakes.

20.08.2017, 17:43

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

AniseedBalls wrote:The stereotypical view of a model on babe channel. That of having ridiculous false tits, gross tattoos, costume comprising of stocking and suspenders, too tight a bra with false tits hanging over the top of, until bra removed. Fucking stupid towering shoes worn on bed, hair extensions that fall out. And all this shit as they talk to a girl caller named fucking Rachel. Give us a break for fuck sake girls. If you can't be sexually appealing without all this crap. Then you are in the wrong job.

This is only my opinion, because out there lives a lot of tossers that like this view of a woman. Me personally I like attractive girls, of which the babechannels have none.

Fuck off then, i bet you like bland girls like Ella Jolie, Stella Cox and Scarlett Jones, i've got no problem with people saying the shows are shit but im getting sick and tired of you slagging off girls for their looks, you really are one crazy fucked up bastard

20.08.2017, 16:59

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

I have a plan to make the girl in the show have a suit with some electric pad. Then the audience can text a call to make a shock to make the girl move more. Big Grin

[hidden link - please register]

20.08.2017, 16:55

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

I fucking love this forum malarky. No one listens to me, and if they do they don't give a shit, and I don't expect them to. It's just like real life in many ways, most people don't give a toss there either.

20.08.2017, 14:43

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

I don't want everybody to think I spend my life moaning and groaning but AniseedBalls is right. Surely the silent majority like an attractive girl with natural sex appeal. I could list at least five who have that but no longer appear on the shows. One or two still do but are so boring they aren't worth watching either.
I happened to switch on the other week when what appeared was reminiscent of something washed up on a beach in Scotland. I was waiting for someone to throw a rope around her to drag her back to the ocean. Zero sex appeal she had. Zero personality was coming across to me anyway. Put it this way, if I was out and about and met a Sammie Pennington or Kitty Lea I would conclude by their look that they are approachable as well as gorgeous and that is half the selling point of these shows.
I just happened to listen in to a call once and even the monotonous drone of AE (you know) fakely moaning and saying "Yeah baby" and "Right there baby" was , frankly, hilarious, and had me as flaccid as I was at my grannies funeral. Also, the subject of feet. I like a nicely turned ankle and well looked after foot, but, again, the fetish merchants hijack the whole shebang with their "Shoes on, shoes off" scenarios.
Finally, There is a lovely looking blonde on today who has been around for years and with good reason. She hasn't moved for two years(yawn). Yet she appears in questionable videos involving some kind of kidnap, rape fantasy which I find totally irresponsible and seems to cater for the one per cent who I don't think should be catered for. Just my opinion.
My gripe is that why does she think that's acceptable but to jiggle her tits about a bit and have someone actually have a fantasy about giving her a good old fashioned rogering is off limits? Its a fucked up world.

20.08.2017, 12:03

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

The stereotypical view of a model on babe channel. That of having ridiculous false tits, gross tattoos, costume comprising of stocking and suspenders, too tight a bra with false tits hanging over the top of, until bra removed. Fucking stupid towering shoes worn on bed, hair extensions that fall out. And all this shit as they talk to a girl caller named fucking Rachel. Give us a break for fuck sake girls. If you can't be sexually appealing without all this crap. Then you are in the wrong job.

This is only my opinion, because out there lives a lot of tossers that like this view of a woman. Me personally I like attractive girls, of which the babechannels have none.

19.08.2017, 16:48

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

I often checked that thread hoping for an old Pad/early bird video or even one featuring a long lost or forgotten babe who actually did something for the imagination like Kimberly Gordon who was underrated in my opinion. But no its just a production line of 2 or 3 year old vids of Kandi or the indian twins doing exactly what they did last night or every other night in between. Don't get me wrong, you guys do a great job making time and effort to put videos up for fans of a any particular bird. But the kowtowing by people about "Ashley twerking her great arse to the camera" or "Another wonderful show from Lola" makes me want to throw my vindaloo down the bog. Once you see one Ashley Emma show you've seen them all, and the less said about Lola the better (Horses for courses).
If you look at a ten minute clip of any show from the last five years and compare it to an Emma Spellar clip from 2010/11 there is no comparison. Obviously the picture quality wasn't great back then put the quality of performance more than made up for it. There was a sense of excitement and anticipation which doesn't exist any more.
Yours sincerely
(Mildly)Angry from Manchester

19.08.2017, 11:27

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

isn't it funny how we can trace so much back to 2011? Almost as if the game changed somewhere then.

one of my file host accounts is currently showing roughly 2800 downloads, i could count the thanks/likes for those files on a couple of hands so i'd be going very hungry if that was my reason.
Amateur models online