Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

In the Inbetweeners movie, The four lads go to Greece on holiday and the tall dopey one (Neil, I think) pulls this old tart in the disco. This is the Babechannels definition of a "Cougar".

Whereas any normal definition of said cougar would include the ladies mentioned by AniseedBalls below.

Some of the monsters that appear on that channel would just about stiffen my granddads cock, and hes been dead for twenty years.

Babechannels by name but certainly not by nature, if being a certain age defines someone as being ''a babe''. Very loosely my definition of a babe would be a good looking girl in her twenties. But take a look at the girls doing the rounds on all of the babechannels and the vast majority are 30 plus, and a big plus in many cases. The future doesn't really bode well if the night time models over thirty way outnumber the models under twenty five. And not just a little over thirty, but for some quite a few years older. Lucy Zara, Lynda Leigh, Danni Harwood, Leigh Darby, Linsey Dawn Mckenzie, just a few that i remember, all 35 plus.

Some may like the more mature model, but i don't. And i certainly can't put them in the babe class. The five i have mentioned cannot muster up one pair of natural tits between them. For me that is not what being a babe is, old saggy tits propped up with silicone is not attractive.

And that is without mentioning an even older collection of ladies, laughingly known as ''Cougars''. Now whatever the correct definition of babe is. A lady with a bigger waist measurement than mine isn't an accurate one, thats for fucking sure.

for a start he's providing a service to those who like to pretend that they watched and that the nation holds it's collective breath on their opinion. and second, it means the more 'open eyed' amongst us can just dismiss another show as different day, same shite.

i've never understood how so many people can appear to need so little sleep. Nearly every job i've ever had has required being awake for 5.30/6am so my viewing and calling has always been limited to 10-11.30pm at most. But there is always the factor that these people don't call and so therefore it's just a free show. then you wonder why they don't just whack one out to some random internet porn and fuck off to bed but then you end up back at the fact that so many of them believe they have a relationship with these girls, that the 'follow me back' on twitter or friending on facebook somehow implies a real friendship and not one solely based on the girls belief that these people are paying customers and it might improve the all important call stats.

One o clock, maybe two sometimes if there was a decent girl on, I would stay up to watch these shows. But later than that it would be sleep deprivation. But that was long ago and now it would be much earlier.

But I was always surprised that people would stay up all night to watch
the "best and worst" of offerings. But they did, and they still do. Do adult channel viewers not need sleep, how do they hold down a job. I presume they have a job to pay for the phone calls they make, don't they?

The poster "Train" who records in great detail the happenings of the night with the likes of "at 4-28 she took of her purple and black bra, and sat "side on" for eight minutes until fucking off home." Can someone tell me what is the fucking point of staying up till the morning chorus to tell anyone that. Or does he just record everything and then report on it the following morning? However the man does it, he is a fucking lunatic. But I have to admit his lunacy does entertain me.

Not fan of tattoos. But like anyone, I would let some babes off depending on what they look like. Tatts on fingers (Madison Rose and to a lesser extent Cara Brett) are rotten. They look like Durham truckers. The body ones like Ella Jolie and Mica Martinez are equally rotten and just look stupid. I would forgive Gemma Hiles because she looks so good anyway that you hardly notice it. The same went for Natasha Marley, up to a few years ago when I saw some pictures and a once perfect babe was reduced to a ridiculous canvas.

Look at the girls who make money from high end modelling and websites (Mikaela Witt, Anastasia Harris etc) hardly any tattoos noticeable, if at all. It would be the same in any walk of life. If someone went for a job in a bank with a spider web tattooed on their face I think the interviewer would make his mind up fairly quickly what the outcome is going to be.

In my experience people, especially girls, who cover themselves in these things are attention seekers with low self esteem who angrily turn on you if you don't agree that their colourful "sleeve" is "gorgeous". Its like I'm the one with the mental deficiency.

not a fan of tattoos either, funny since the shows have been shit more than usual, I have been watching some of my old Mica video collection from late 2009 / early 2010... back when she only had about 2 or 3 tattoos.. and my god that woman was stunning... but look at her now... what a waste.... ... now don't get me wrong, Mica is still hot... but every time I see her I'm like... what a shame.

again more into the natural look, but don't mind boob jobs if done properly... not like Candy Charms or Kerrie Lee, despise fake lips... totally fucks up the face... can't watch lola knight ever since she got her top lip done... keeps reminding me of Leslie Ash

Oh my giddy aunt and hell's bells and buckets of blood!!! Not the fat bird Charley G with her unfeasibly humongous flabby barrage balloons on yet again!!!. Lord, give me the will to live, PLEASE

Im not a big fan of tattoos but it depends on how many tattoos a girl has, most of my faves have a few tattoos on them and i was a fan of a few girls who had loads of tatts like Camilla Jayne and Candy Sexton, but in general i would prefer a girl not to have tatts or just a couple of small ones.

I do like boob jobs though and i think the natural look is overrated as i find the likes of Scarlett Jones, Stella Cox and Hannah Martin as bland and generic as they come

I think the prevelance of tattoos has been a major factor in diminishing appeal on these channels for most people. It's difficult to know sometimes whether you are supposed to be wanking or reading. Tattood arms are a no go for me with the possible exception of small, inside wrist/watch area which i can just about tolerate.

It seems to have become almost compulsory to be covered in them though and you do wonder whether there is any pressure being applied by the channels to the girls to get tattoos (and in fact boob jobs as well). The numbers who appear originally with neither, vanish off screen for a few months and then return with both is noticeable. The number of girls on screen with neither is minimal.

My gripe today is about models and their tattoos. Some men love tattoos, some men detest them. I belong to the latter and I absolutely fucking loathe them. And when the girls who have tattoos try to justify having them by saying that they signify something that was happening in their life at the time, then i find that to be the biggest load of bollocks. The amount of tattoos some girls have, two arms full, body, back and front, stretching down the legs on some girls. It makes you think what the fuck have these girls been up to, and what as been happening in their lives to create all that significance..... Tell you what. Fuck all as been happening other than they think that they make them look cool.....And once again my answer is ''bollocks''!

I have never seen a pretty girl made to look prettier by adding ink to the underside of her skin. But now i see what was once a pretty girl no longer because she as gone down the tattoo road and covered up the beauty she once had. Does having some script etched into her skin in a place where she can't read it make her more eyecatching, and does anyone really need to know what the words mean. Words that probably came to mind on a drunken binge in Magaluf as the thoughts of a shattered lust affair came to mind. And why the customary tramp stamp? The only person to take a close look at that is the chap who is giving her a jolly good rodgering from behind...Would that count as significant? Maybe....

Anyway, thats my view on the subject. I would love to hear others views........

morning star there is a simple answer to your second sentence. The person you are obviously referring to will not praise anyone who doesn't follow him back on twitter. A prime example would be mia from expanded - never expressed an opinion on her - she follows him back on twitter and bang she's joined the 'great show from....' club. But the more pertinent facts are he doesn't call the shows and has been called out on this on twitter by some of the girls (bex shiner springs to mind) and the girls are blissfully unaware that he doesn't actually watch 99% of them. It goes like this: quick check to see who's on, flick around the channels make a note of outfits, sets etc > bed. Get up, hang around the forum for 90 minutes watching who posts what follow up any posts which reference outfits, sets etc by reiterating or make generic 'great show' comment. job done, twitter ahoy. Hype and advertising duties fulfilled.

Scottishbloke is right. I find it beyond belief that someone can offer an opinion of every girls performance on every channel every single day, and its the same muck I have to read every time. Theres no critique. Just gushing praise. Who are these idiots?

I go over there to look at the pictures of girls I fancy and maybe a video if it looks good, but my precious time gets wasted trawling through their latest twitter posts and mindless fawning. To be honest I don't bother downloading videos any more because they are all the same.

This brings me to the point about the old videos. I love the old Emma Spellar stuff from the pad or Sammie P but these are or seem to be non existant any more, so any re uploads would just be of the shite that has happened in the last five years or so. Ill pass.

I know it sounds like I'm always moaning but its a known fact that men are turned on by what they see before anything else. A fat bird slumped in a chair with her fingers down her knickers just off camera doesn't cut it with me. But hey, what do I know?

morningstar wrote:AniseedBalls is correct. Much too much negativity. So id just like to say it was a very good show from Ashley last night including plenty of nakedness & lovely views of her magnificent arse in & out of skimpy lingerie. Also Charley G gets more stunning every week, I cant wait for more soon please.

Disclaimer: The views expressed above may not necessarily be mine and indeed may be construed as bullshit if you wish.

You know I have been around forums for years now and there is always at least one member who will continue to churn out auto generated posts. Some are more subtle about it than others are but the upshot to it all is a very unhealthy obsession with quantity over originality and quality every time. This can take on many faces. I can see through each and every single member that does this and these are the posts I will continue to ignore and by and large just so long that its harmless and doesn't get in my way I tend not to post any public objections to it and leave them to it. Rammy on the other forum is an entirely different prospect altogether. He is in your face and trolling discussion Threads so he deserves every bit of ammunition that comes his way.

With regards to the post Aniseedballs made well ofcourse there is a lot of truth in it. I first got SKY installed in 2004 and knew nothing about the very existence of these channels before like most people stumbling across them by pure accident. The history of Babestation - Courtesy of Wikipedia is a very good read and goes into great detail over the history of Babestation and these types of channels in general. So yeah......obviously at first they were a pure novelty to me, the idea that I no longer had to go into a seedy stripclub to see a live glamour show as I could now watch it from the comfort of my own living room.

They did however hit a very high point, perhaps we were just so spoiled that we eventually took great shows as the norm. Who knows but I still live in hope that another golden era happens again but the more channels that drop the less likely it is going to be. I predicted that Babestation would be the last one standing and I stand by this gloomy prediction. Once all the clones have deceased Babestation will also join them in Babe Channel scrap yard and the tragic reality is that this forum will become dominated by old uploads from the past and mainly Off Topic Threads which have got absolutely fuck all to do with the channels or the glamour industry whatsoever.

Have a nice day everyone

Oh yeah, please give me more of Ashley's bum and more of the gorgeously stunning fat bird Charley G with her magnificent mega mammaries on our screens Mr. producer, pretty pretty please-------ha, ha, ha, only joshing, folks!!!!!!

AniseedBalls is correct. Much too much negativity. So id just like to say it was a very good show from Ashley last night including plenty of nakedness & lovely views of her magnificent arse in & out of skimpy lingerie. Also Charley G gets more stunning every week, I cant wait for more soon please.

Disclaimer: The views expressed above may not necessarily be mine and indeed may be construed as bullshit if you wish.