Eurotic TV - General Discussion

simply22in roshana discussion and chat wrote:

genaroxp wrote:I'm a bit surprised that she show now her pussy without any problems and on a way as if she had never done anything else (routine) because in her first nightshows she has always said (on the mic) that she don't want to take off her pants but it's of course nice to see that she has change her opinion about that unfortunately the camerawork was not the best last night and also the guy/girl on the buttons had a very nervous and fast finger and had switch to fast from her to other models when she was showing something interesting and the not fulfilling of 3 or 4 shower show requests (what was the fault of the director) was then the coronation.

I agree with you and I dont understand why this camerawork dont work good! I think they must to change work, because if this is a Etv show and after 23/24 the girls must to shows nudity, the camerawork too must to do the work better, because in many shows much models as (Kristina, Scarlet, Kia, Nancy ecc ecc.) shows totally nude, but the watch is bad......and so I think many person change channel....this is only my opinion. :-)

....maybe is an etv strategy given by the fact of the sms,requestes for the models...you means kristina,scarlet,kia and nancy(and don't forget kate and maschiara) that now(for me)are the most popular models in etv business (remember this is a business) we don't know if now etv business are good or bad but now for their this is the right way
for me roshana step by step will become one of the most popular model in etv and we will see the right camera time even for her (censorship aside)
only my little and insignificant opinion of course

Tarl_Cabot wrote:1.are you sure that etv is really the owner of the etvclub.com?
2.in the past SexySat wasn't the owner of this forum too although the names were nearly the same.
3.and to be serious: who cares about the numbers or the etvclub.com?
4.these numbers are annoying and destroy every possibility of a good show.

5.and with you writing your question and me answering to you we both have spent already more time with that stupid etvclub.com than that website deserves.

1. no, I'm not. is ownership important ? it bears the name etv and they try to make money with it.
2. no comment/opinion
3. good question : most likely no-one. but they give you a good laugh
4. absolutely correct, agree to 100%. great work, etv managers
and finally
5. agree again.

So the closing picture is that the downward sloping etv management clings desperately to any rescueing straw

Tarl_Cabot wrote:iirc is / was a link to the etvclub.com since some years on the etv homepage.
and iirc did they already in the past some advertisement in the shows.

I didn't checked this - fortunately. But now it can't be overlooked.

logic wrote:I think the numbers are real, but I think also that nobody here believe that in this few days of advertising by ETV they get this high number of profiles. If you have a closer look on the etvclub website you can find out that it is only a corporate with still existing social networks. ETV want to make some additional money with it and why not. The only annoying thing is that they fill the complete evening "show" with it.
Ok, there is not much show left which they can destroy with it.

iirc is / was a link to the etvclub.com since some years on the etv homepage.
and iirc did they already in the past some advertisement in the shows.
so either the etvclub needs urgently new members and has started new advertisement or etv needs urgently new money and sells the show time as an advertisement.
anyway a stupid idea.

njutare wrote:A question to all readers in this forum :

Does anyone believe the numbers of etv-club profiles for each country
as shown on the plasmas reflects reality ?

Or could the numbers be just a little mistake.....( like the spelling of UK, Unaited K ) ?

The brilliant etv management must render us for quite naive.

I think the numbers are real, but I think also that nobody here believe that in this few days of advertising by ETV they get this high number of profiles. If you have a closer look on the etvclub website you can find out that it is only a corporate with still existing social networks. ETV want to make some additional money with it and why not. The only annoying thing is that they fill the complete evening "show" with it.
Ok, there is not much show left which they can destroy with it.

njutare wrote:A question to all readers in this forum :

Does anyone believe the numbers of etv-club profiles for each country
as shown on the plasmas reflects reality ?

Or could the numbers be just a little mistake.....( like the spelling of UK, Unaited K ) ?

The brilliant etv management must render us for quite naive.

are you sure that etv is really the owner of the etvclub.com?
in the past SexySat wasn't the owner of this forum too although the names were nearly the same.
and to be serious: who cares about the numbers or the etvclub.com?
these numbers are annoying and destroy every possibility of a good show.

and with you writing your question and me answering to you we both have spent already more time with that stupid etvclub.com than that website deserves.

A question to all readers in this forum :

Does anyone believe the numbers of etv-club profiles for each country
as shown on the plasmas reflects reality ?

Or could the numbers be just a little mistake.....( like the spelling of UK, Unaited K ) ?

The brilliant etv management must render us for quite naive.

Joker1305 wrote:Numbers of SMS for several of the "hot" models went down.

... watch more carefully...

Joker1305 wrote:Numbers of SMS for several of the "hot" models went down.
From my impression (without exact counting or claiming to be complete):
-Uwe some less
-Since stopping balloonrides Marcel much less
-Monika&Klaus much less
-Slow only occasionally
-Ute only occasionally
-Bene Papst only coccasionally
-Eki only very few times
And probably I missed some others.

Regards
Joker

Count out Eki who abdicated evening show 3.2.12 due to too hi love songs towards other guys.

karimi wrote:again new project
[hidden link - please register]

the website seems to be new.
the VoiPay service is active since some weeks and was already discussed in this thread.
iirc it's saving a few money but allowes longer calls from some countries.

again new project
[hidden link - please register]

universal wrote:...

Yes, can be that we can deduct from it: less made show fewer SMS (for the hot models)

Yes,
unfortunately ETV could think just the other way round: SMS for hot models go down, SMS for soft models are stable, so we need more soft models in the night shows

Regards
Joker

Joker1305 wrote:I think mostly b)
Numbers of SMS for several of the "hot" models went down.
From my impression (without exact counting or claiming to be complete):
-Uwe some less
-Since stopping balloonrides Marcel much less
-Monika&Klaus much less
-Slow only occasionally
-Ute only occasionally
-Bene Papst only coccasionally
-Eki only very few times
And probably I missed some others.

Regards
Joker

Yes, can be that we can deduct from it: less made show fewer SMS (for the hot models)

Hilbert wrote:Therefore, assuming statistically significant data, if the average SMS per hour in nightshows is 23% lower than the average from Sep-Dec 2011, the greater value of the top models SMSs/hour index (2012 Karry 4.78 vs 2011 Scarlet 2.80) then could mean that:
a) SMSs have been focused on a smaller number of models, i.e. Karry, Evah and Scarlet.
b) the overall number of ETV models "deployed" in the nightshows has been cut more than 23%.
c) both of them.
...

I think mostly b)
Numbers of SMS for several of the "hot" models went down.
From my impression (without exact counting or claiming to be complete):
-Uwe some less
-Since stopping balloonrides Marcel much less
-Monika&Klaus much less
-Slow only occasionally
-Ute only occasionally
-Bene Papst only coccasionally
-Eki only very few times
And probably I missed some others.

Regards
Joker

If they let Karry or Evah do a nightshow as often as Scarlet or some others do this will change I am sure.
The best example is Joanna were everyone knows what is possible and what is not because she is more regular in the nightshow.
you must be careful with adding softgirls to the nightshow.
Someday the biggest fool realize the trick.

Interesting is this "the average sms per hour in nighthows was 23% lower than the average from Sep - Dec 2011".
Is footfetish dying out is there hope to save this channel ?
a joke maybe the shows are less interesting as before
maybe some explicit pussyscenes which they avoid nowadays if possible kept the viewers from sleeping.
I am just guessing maybe someone has an idea.