Eurotic TV - General Discussion

I remember that this was the case for the first ELS Ava, because the first part was someone intervention and after the show is over and you have not returned to the level that was at the beginning.
But there were a few shows Timi, and everyone had the same course, except that she had said that this is her show and no one will impose her what to do.

ironboy wrote:If any of you ever watched the show Timi, it knows that the internet there is no censorship. And only on the models and technical team depends on what and how something is displayed, and when it comes to cigarettes, but rather rules on prohibitions are only on paper. Just a little sad because the girls are wasting their health
. Regards Ironboy.

The same limitations that are applied to tv are also applied to the internet. No difference in that.
A difference is that in the els it is only a model and a camera (in theory there is also a director, but they are usually busy with other duties and stay out of the studio most of the time).
If they notice shows like Timis that are not within the limits, the director is rushed in to make sure the show is in compliance.

please do not forget, that regardless of censorship or any potential censorship, it is also the girls to decide how far they want to go, or what they want to show.

slow

The strategy of bosses ETV is that the viewer must always be dissatisfied.
If will be viewers satisfied they will only watch the show for free.
ETV offers becoming less . Viewers pay and they hope that the show will be better.
So far the strategy is working, but how much longer?

(my opinion)

If any of you ever watched the show Timi, it knows that the internet there is no censorship. And only on the models and technical team depends on what and how something is displayed, and when it comes to cigarettes, but rather rules on prohibitions are only on paper. Just a little sad because the girls are wasting their health
. Regards Ironboy.

Chris26 wrote:

brudgon wrote:but i'm not saying to you that you are talking about invented censorship
i want only to say that in the web show there musn't be censorship because customers pay for watch
for the molvanian's laws i think they use these laws only for the public tv censorship
i repeat that this is only my thought and member or members well informed than me can help me

For the censorship, I agree.
For the laws, there's no difference: web studio or TV studio, it is always a workplace with (hopefully) regularly hired workers: national laws apply to both, regardless of any purported TV censorship.
The only loophole I could envision is if they were able to cover the smoking act as some kind of artistic performance.

Granted, there has to be an "artistic performance" to begin with, though.

thanks for the laws info
then i think that in the web show ETV (for me) is in the wrong way cause the censorship because they have some models with a great potential for the web and if they will change the format i think they will reach many and many customers again
i hope in the new year things will change
anyway i will continue to watch because i don't care about ETV crew but i care about some models works in

brudgon wrote:but i'm not saying to you that you are talking about invented censorship
i want only to say that in the web show there musn't be censorship because customers pay for watch
for the molvanian's laws i think they use these laws only for the public tv censorship
i repeat that this is only my thought and member or members well informed than me can help me

For the censorship, I agree.
For the laws, there's no difference: web studio or TV studio, it is always a workplace with (hopefully) regularly hired workers: national laws apply to both, regardless of any purported TV censorship.
The only loophole I could envision is if they were able to cover the smoking act as some kind of artistic performance.

Granted, there has to be an "artistic performance" to begin with, though.

Chris26 wrote:

brudgon wrote:true but i think in the web show (customers pay to watch) there isn't any kind of ban

I'm sorry, but I'm not talking about invented censorship, I'm talking about Molvanian laws.
By your same reasoning, models would be allowed to kill people on camera on the Web.

but i'm not saying to you that you are talking about invented censorship
i want only to say that in the web show there musn't be censorship because customers pay for watch
for the molvanian's laws i think they use these laws only for the public tv censorship
i repeat that this is only my thought and member or members well informed than me can help me

brudgon wrote:true but i think in the web show (customers pay to watch) there isn't any kind of ban

I'm sorry, but I'm not talking about invented censorship, I'm talking about Molvanian laws.
By your same reasoning, models would be allowed to kill people on camera on the Web.

Chris26 wrote:That is true, for example cream seems to be forbidden one day and allowed another.
Not to mention that technically, in Molvania, smoking is forbidden in any kind of public place or workplace, but some Premium Shows seem to be outside of this ban.

true but i think in the web show (customers pay to watch) there isn't any kind of ban
i think and i'm not sure this is only my thought even if i think why customers must to pay for watch a show where there is some kind of ban?

That is true, for example cream seems to be forbidden one day and allowed another.
Not to mention that technically, in Molvania, smoking is forbidden in any kind of public place or workplace, but some Premium Shows seem to be outside of this ban.

pollopollo wrote:It's paradox :
Janine as a model provided some rock-hard , the shows were almost Hardcor already .
Claudia , Angelina , Tia , Calomira well .
Based on new and old emails from ETV, I could easily see the IP address that you still send from the same country as before...

There's not much doubt ETV is still in the same place. Anyway legislation might have changed there in the last years.
And according to what I read here they have an Austrian satellite license, so they are affected by the legislation of two countries.
But for sure legislation doesn't change back and forth from one day to the other, so it doesn't explain some shows are deadly boring and others are smoking hot.
I think their biggest problem are the so called directors. Too many and too less professional and maybe to less influence on the staff at the mixer.
I can imagine it also makes the models tired to get contrary instructions from one show to the other.

Regards
Joker

It's paradox :
Janine as a model provided some rock-hard , the shows were almost Hardcor already .
Claudia , Angelina , Tia , Calomira well .
Based on new and old emails from ETV , I could easily see the IP address that you still send from the same country as before.
The spell of the modes , you should not send nudity draws at all so .
The business model of the past, was to show hei0e and TV shows and then INXTC PointX cheer.
Now do it the other way around , you make the show boring.
At the same time it refers to the premium shows on the Internet .
Just a coincidence , probably not!

Chris26 wrote:

Slowfox wrote:you know well that this is pure polemic and no argument.

So why are you posting then?

Edit: I'll try to make myself clearer, if, as you say, the 'vast majority' of people are happy customers and we, by following your reasoning, are nothing but mere unhappy drops in a sea of happiness, then there's absolutely no reason to reply to our useless criticism.

valid point. unfortunately a waste of time on my side. thanks your concerns though

Slowfox wrote:you know well that this is pure polemic and no argument.

So why are you posting then?

Edit: I'll try to make myself clearer, if, as you say, the 'vast majority' of people are happy customers and we, by following your reasoning, are nothing but mere unhappy drops in a sea of happiness, then there's absolutely no reason to reply to our useless criticism.