| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
Damir, I think most prefer to see Scarlet, with handbrad, rather than see plastic tits. Or I think so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not at all concerned how far or explicit a model is if I don't find her attractive.Just seeing naked female parts of a model that doesn't turn me on is a waste of time for me.My biggest gripe with the show has always been the camerawork/production/direction etc.
My favourites are Monna,Clio,Gia and Scarlet none of whom you would describe as hot even though Gia and Scarlet have been putting on very good hotter shows lately. The new model may go further and produce a hot night show but I don't care if she's not my type.A hot show can mean explicit to so many people but not to me.A girl that turns me on(see above) going a little bit further out of her comfort zone is 'Hot' to me.For reference I mean Monna-College Girl night and the 'wet T-shirt' show.Clio-when she went braless wearing the loose stripy top with the back lighting so you could see the silhouette of her breasts.Gia-the recent slips and loose handbras.Scarlet-the knickers off shows and side topless scenes.These are the things that turn me on and what I consider to be hot.Continuous nudity from a model I feel nothing for is not hot to me.I hope I have explained my position clearly. Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
damir wrote:Ruud47 wrote: @damir I know what you mean, boring girls like yesterday evening. But I am not willing to accept plastic dolls at ETV, there are enough channels with plastic fantastic. But, I can understand your point of view. |
|
|
|
|
I dont understand all your complaints , I started the discussion about the new girl and my idea about her when I have just seen her act. So she is not my type so are many appearing on this TV , I can say that Lace is also not my type but I have never thought she should be removed as she adds a lot of spice to the show and is a trigger to many hot scenes. And I can name many others !! My sole complaint was that she looks a professional and not an amateur (at least most of the girls at ETV started so) . I didn't complain about the plastic ( I don't like it - for me a girl like Angelina is more sexy but this is a matter of taste) and I can assure you that many "Next Door girls" have plastic on them.
On the other hand I am very pleased with what is happening on the show first at least we got 2 hot girls Tia and Janette and I am sure we all vote for Tia but I have no problem with Janette show as it changes the atmosphere of the show and she and Tia Lace can create the trigger which is so missed after the departure of Jaya Tamara Megan and the rest of the gang. Second we can see that suddenly things that were mot allowed before are allowed now that means it was self imposed . third this brings hope for the future. I just hope as things are working at ETV tomorrow they can take another 180 degrees tyrn so let hope the wont. Maybe they have planted the seeds (soft models) with hope that when harvest time will come they will develop in to hot models but unfortunately it didn't happen with the current atmosphere when each girl is just imitating what the other does afraid to take any bold action. Remember in the good time the old models used to encourage the new one for action now the spark is missing |
|
|
|
|
|
Ruud47 wrote:
I go along with you for hotter shows, good regie and camerawork and of course naturally good looking girls. But I don't prefer plastic dolls, so for me no plastic fantastic. @Ruud47 like I said also prefer naturally girls(Sabrina,Tia)..I can only accept really nice girls(Scarlet,Gia) to do hot teasing show,but covering tits all the time every show also became boring.. I will rather to accept a platic girls then boring girls who are not willing to do a fullstrip and hot night show |
|
|
|
|
|
|
damir wrote:First I prefer naturally girls then plastic! @damir I go along with you for hotter shows, good regie and camerawork and of course naturally good looking girls. But I don't prefer plastic dolls, so for me no plastic fantastic. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aria is the italian mod in the current show.
|
|
|
|
|
First I prefer naturally girls then plastic!
But this show with Jeanette is example of a good night show.If you prefer boring shows,feet show.. or if you want to talk with girls you can do it all the dayshow,but night show should be a hot show with lot of fullstrips and good regie/camerawork( to support hot show,not to cut..). Other night shift girls should follow way of Tia/Jeanette do the hot show..I hope etv and all you moaners and critcizers see this is the only right/positive way and step forward in making a good nightshow and I hope they will continue to introduce new (naturally,plastic,good looking..) hot girls!  Well done Jeanette,Tia,etv 
|
|
|
|
|
|
@kolokotronis, you wrote: For me nikita is not model
Sorry, you are not up to date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ moreno
2nd shift today from your dreamgirl, have fun!
|
|
|
|
|
|
outside wrote:Why this page has been larger than usual?sorry, the girl from the foot video accidently stepped on it ... |
|
|
|
|
|
Why this page has been larger than usual?
|
|
|
|
|
|
elmo wrote:ETV have now on a few occasions in the last few days shown what is possible and permissible during the early hours.I'm pretty sure that etv doesn't really know what is allowed and what isn't. But from reading the latest decissions from rtr, I'm pretty sure that they know, that they aren't walking on safe ground. They must have a plan and a goal to achieve that they consider important enough to risk the license (and I assume they hope not to get caught). elmo wrote:It seems to meagreed. I guess that's the reason to hire Jeanette to make that clear to the other models. elmo wrote:b. all the messing with effects, camera shots, cutaways etc.I think it's definitly a lack of competence on the directors side, if it isn't done deliberatley to have exactly this incompetence as an excuse if they got caught ... elmo wrote:c.the members here are all undecided as to what they wantNothing new under the sun ... elmo wrote:Introduce a new model who does the biz like no other in the history of this channel, who despite her somewhat worn features does nothing else but polarize the audience.Agreed elmo wrote:What is really shown is the confusion & lack of direction at the production level.I don't think so. I see a lot of preasure is build up on the soft models to become hotter. With Jeanette the preasure is also on the ones currently supposed to be hot models. In some cases this works (Scarlet, ...) in some cases it doesn't (Cleopatra, Clio, ...). Btw: how many nightshifts do the really soft models do? I think not more than one per week (if it is that much). How many shifts do they per week? I don't think it's more than four ... So there seems to be some preasure being build up from the administrative side, too. elmo wrote:if this is not to anybodies personal taste, watch something else and don't moan and groan.totally agreed So what is going on? I don't really know, but I think that we will see some occasional warm to hot shows in the next weeks, until ... well, whatever it is they are planning, but from what I see I assume it will be pretty hot. |
|
|
|
fihibi wrote:1- Night show : Sorry fihibi 1- Night show : Gia, Scarlet, Mashiana, Sabrina, Vivian, Tia, Janitte, Carmen, Inez, Nicole, Amy, Athina, Randa, Chanel, Penolope, Candy I have take away some names of ugly and boring girls. Instead Regina isn't more possible and who is Inge? |
|
|
|
|
|
I have a greed idea
Why do not separately the models to 2 categories and select No 1 for night show and No 2 for other show The category I suggested : 1- Night show : Gia, Scarlet, Mashirana, Sabrina, Vivian, , Tia, Lace, Janitte, Carmen, Inz, Nicole, clio, Amy, Athina, Randa, Chanel, Spirit, Inge, Aria, Lia, Rigena, penople, jessy, nikita 2- Morning show : other And every night show 2 or 3 to present new show Operator can do that if he looking for our interested |
|
|
|
