| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
JBGOOD wrote:I simply wanted to say that I miss the times when all the discussions were focused only on the shows... because there was something to talk about! Completely correct! especially the SMS to the models will be less than that. This will be the SMS anymore, where men are looking for men or women. Many send SMS also no more,because your wishes anyway are not met. |
|
|
|
|
|
JohnGuitar wrote:Hello my fellow members, [hidden link - please register] Seems you don't have the webphone plugin installed |
|
|
|
|
Premium Shows getting softer and softer and repeating basically same kind of routine over and over again.
They should change the script not only the price for Shows and make them at least slightly more erotic and sexy. Just because sometimes some models gets undressed does not mean erotic Show. |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello my fellow members,
I have a problem for a while, which I need to share with you in case you lend me help. Anytime I open the Erotic's Website & Webstream in the section LIVE SHOW there is always pop-up showing: InstallerWeb.Cab followed by from SECURAX to be installed. Did anyone encounter or come into this problem? And what is the solution and possible risk? Thank you and have a nice weekend JohnGuitar |
|
|
|
|
JohnGuitar wrote:On the ETV-WALL has been written today as below under the signature of anonymous: Fact is, *I* wrote that message as a private message to cheer them up because I was in a good mood, NOT to the wall - I was sure surprised to see that they had removed the name I signed it with (I wasn't "anonymous" in the PM) and put it on the public wall. It was not meant to go there, but at least I didn't have to pay for the privilege of writing on the wall...  So please, tin-foil hats, stop seeing conspiracies EVERYWHERE. It wasn't straightforward of them to make it public, but they did not write it themselves. For one thing, the grammar actually works in my note...  PS. I might as well clarify that I meant that if I ONLY wanted nudity I'd be a fool to watch ETV when there are so many alternatives. I do appreciate what there is, of course. |
|
|
|
|
|
I simply wanted to say that I miss the times when all the discussions were focused only on the shows... because there was something to talk about!
Im my modest opinion the whole ETVshow world is in deep crisis: the interest in their products is decresaing day after day. The whole product, web included. Lack of comments , the decreasing of active members here but also the evident decreasing of SMS during the NS... I suggest once again to do this comparison: have a look at old videos of NS and then compare to the premium show (the best they offer now, not the night show) and give your true opinion I do not care to supremacy, clans etc...what for? In the good old days someone was used to write here: "its only fun". is it no more possible? Yes it is: but all is the hands of ETVteam Have a nice weekend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JohnGuitar wrote:Now there is common sense that: EROTIC = NUDITY, and nudity is not hardcore. And there's another common sense suggesting that erotism = teasing, suggesting, looking forcefully at the viewers... naked or not 
|
|
|
|
|
On the ETV-WALL has been written today as below under the signature of anonymous:
if I wanted nudity or hardcore porn there are other sites, but for what I prefer, your channel is the best. Please let the rest of the gang know they are much appreciated! Best regards, Anonymous Now there is common sense that: EROTIC = NUDITY, and nudity is not hardcore. So, Erotic TV means nudity shows, therefore I believe Anonymous = Molvanian = Hypocrite, you can not explain otherwise. The true hypocrite is the one who ceases to perceive his deception, the one who lies with sincerity. Please ETV stop writing lies and face the music.  JohnGuitar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JBGOOD wrote:Another page of dicussion on members/mods attitudes..one against the other....but nothing about the shows.In the past even the future was better Just kidding ;) IMHO the problem with the current night shows is, they are not really shows. They are rather sessions with girls doing a sometimes good, sometimes bad performance, but there's no theme, no plot, no idea behind and except of minor changes in furniture always the same scenery. And many great girls left in the last 2 years. So no wonder many people aren't happy with the current situation at ETV. And there are some with their own agenda, they try to use this latent dissatisfaction to gather people behind them in order to get the supremacy over this forum. On the other hand there are some people who are not that dissatisfied with ETV and want this forum to stay the enjoyable place place it was in the past years, but not not flooded with lamentation how bad ETV is. So no wonder many discussions turn into a power play between these two groups. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
dazaman wrote:................................, are people chicken or sheep is my question you still need to protect your back from the wolves of ETV 
|
|
|
|
|
Another page of dicussion on members/mods attitudes..one against the other....but nothing about the shows.
This looks to me as another clear indicator about the real situation of ETVshow and specially the web project. In the old good times always strong discussions about the models, regie, shows...only that. i would suggest, who can do, to check videos of the night shows of March,24th 2010. 3 years ago. Than i have a question: are the actual premium shows of the same intensity, emotionals and full of nice performances as that " twins show" ? Thanks for your kind replies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outside wrote:It was just what I wanted to say, it was compatible to Angelina's missing. I didn't read your post as a simple question. that's my mistake, sorry for this. @Data & space: my answer was to outside's If yes, webshow was recorded. which didn't include any maybe or possible results but only a yes or no. are you sure that I'm alive, that you are alive? did you chose the red or the blue pill??? |
|
|
|
|
|
dazaman wrote:To be perfectly honest lucifer, these people who pay for something that you don't like is perfectly fine with me, my bank balance does not go up or down, plus like you and others who post, they are adults and free to spend there money how they please. Agreed with the first part...some members and even a moderator told me how to save money and time by not giving money to/not watching ETV. Don't really like suggestions like these as I can decide for myself for what I spend my money and time. The second part is cryptic. Would have been helpful if you posted who was insulting whom with which choice of words and which "sheep" are posting which "same thing". |
|
|
|
|
|
Tarl_Cabot wrote:as you can see in the vid of the show Angelina appeared only in the last 3.5 mins which fits perfectly to her appearance in the fta show. In my opinion there are three errors in reasoning: 1. It's not proven that it was a live show, it's just proven that it could have been a live show. 2. The conclusion that he would have to confess he's a liar if he doesn't think it was a live show is wrong, because it's not proven to be a live show. 3. He never claimed that it wasn't a live show, he was asking questions about the timing. |
|
|
|
|
|
It was just what I wanted to say, it was compatible to Angelina's missing.
I disclaimed I didn't watch the beginning of the show because I was watching Bayern Munchen-Arsenal. So I asked a question without (I repeat) any hidden goals. Unchecked sources you said, could I post some premium show clips if I obtained that? I knew what happened in premium, didn't know what happened on TV since I was watching something else. So here was my question. P.S. about rules and warnings, let me say this wasn't true at all and you even know about that. Have a nice day. |
|
|
