Last night's show

And about last night show and the continuing superb performance from Nancy

Nancy is an impressive and singular performer no question about that .

But I wonder , what the case would and how this would influence the quality of the night shows !!!!!

If only ....Most of the remaining models (Claudia , Tia , Penelope , ETC ) who usually scheduling for the night shifts .....Have the same ....freedom , chances , time ...the same level as Nancy had and still has ....

Watcher wrote:@'zxcv'
You must get a better translator.
All the individual words make sense, it's just that when it puts them into sentences and paragraphs it goes horribly wrong.
It also has a tendency to create bold text for no apparent reason.

I have never used before a translator And under no circumstances I will use them .

But I promise I will keep the advice of.... The British commandant.... in my mind .

@'outside'
You did add something ... pointless, wasn't it.

@'zxcv'
You must get a better translator.
All the individual words make sense, it's just that when it puts them into sentences and paragraphs it goes horribly wrong.
It also has a tendency to create bold text for no apparent reason.

HvB wrote:hmm, who do you think knows about etvs actual income? You or etv?
Concluding from that: who has to build theories about that?
So your sentence about the failed theories is very true. It just falls back to you ...

On the rest: how does it meet my interests?

Actually I didn't claim or invent any theories .....I am just talking common sense .

My logic is so simple ....the good shows always generate a good income ....

And if not .....for sure it would certainly be your fault simply because you haven't been able to know how to present them ....and on the other hand how to promote and market them in the core market which you already had and still have ....The TV station .

However to continue to say the same reasons over and over and over again ......that doesn't really make any sense .

Time to believe that there is no contradiction between a good shows and good income as well .

HvB wrote:On the rest: how does it meet my interests?

As you strongly support what has been written in the article ...The answer would be easy

I wonder about the regulars callers who want the models concentrate with them only with nothing else between .

I would add something but better in GD topic.

zxcv wrote:

HvB wrote:none.

for a more detailed answer see here: [hidden link - please register]

And so what ??

The same old repetitive excuses and same failed theories !

But I would not blame someone like you who strongly keen to keep the same..... " Status quo "..... as it has always been ....Simply because it certainly meets his own interest .

??? what excuses and theories are you reffering to? I really don't understand because it seems very plausible to me, I can totally imagine someone not calling when the show is already extrememly provoking .... Did you have your own tv station? Is that why you have the real answers? Then why do you not have it anymore (maybe it wasn't working after all) And what would be HvB's interest? I am most curious about that ... really

zxcv wrote:And so what ??

The same old repetitive excuses and same failed theories !

But I would not blame someone like you who strongly keen to keep the same..... " Status quo "..... as it has always been ....Simply because it certainly meets his own interest .

hmm, who do you think knows about etvs actual income? You or etv?
Concluding from that: who has to build theories about that?
So your sentence about the failed theories is very true. It just falls back to you ...

On the rest: how does it meet my interests?

HvB wrote:none.

for a more detailed answer see here: [hidden link - please register]

And so what ??

The same old repetitive excuses and same failed theories !

But I would not blame someone like you who strongly keen to keep the same..... " Status quo "..... as it has always been ....Simply because it certainly meets his own interest .

zxcv wrote:

lucifer70 wrote:How much money Molvanians are throwing out the window to run the flea market on the web, while they sacrifice the nigthshow that, potentially, can lead, as it has always led, fresh money.

let us put it another way :

How much money.... " The Molvanians "... have lost through providing those lame night shows ?

none.

for a more detailed answer see here: [hidden link - please register]

lucifer70 wrote:How much money Molvanians are throwing out the window to run the flea market on the web, while they sacrifice the nigthshow that, potentially, can lead, as it has always led, fresh money.

let us put it another way :

How much money.... " The Molvanians "... have lost through providing those lame night shows ?

How much money Molvanians are throwing out the window to run the flea market on the web, while they sacrifice the nigthshow that, potentially, can lead, as it has always led, fresh money.

lazaridis wrote:Well, what to say about last night ?

various shows. .

.

Too much various

The totally chaotic camera didn`know what it should show- like always if george is director

Well, what to say about last night ?

The show was nicely entertaining, various shows. Nancy and Roshana were great, of course ; Aida did a good performance.

Two disappointments for me (at least until 2h) : Anna was completely invisible. Claudia didn't do much too ; she's there for quite a long time, but still... She has no great aura.

outside wrote:Nancy is the undisputed n.1 at the moment.

Hardest working model in the history of molvanian eroticism.

Ira Was wonderful hottest girl in this moment fully naked. Great