| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
hot_milena wrote:Normally, every change needs its own time to be able to adapt. I dont know about anyone else but the walls could do with a lick of white paint and lights over head rather than shining straight at the camera. |
|
|
|
|
|
Normally, every change needs its own time to be able to adapt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hot_milena wrote:The new studio is great and comfortable for the girls!!!!! Congs to ETV!!!!!Well, I can't judge what the girls really think about it, but the technical staff still seems to struggle  At least I still hope illumination, contrast and focusing will improve. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
|
The new studio is great and comfortable for the girls!!!!! Congs to ETV!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pollopollo wrote:...I'd rather say promised but not kept. HD means at least 1280x720pixel, but ETV still broadcasts 720x576 (standard PAL) in 16:9 at a very poor bit rate. For reference: If I record a normal German SD channel on Astra I have 4GB per hour, with ETV I have 1GB per hour. That focus, contrast and color are now worse than with 4:3 is probably related to new studio equipment which isn't setup or operated properly. Regards Joker.. |
|
|
|
|
|
You just another HD needs watching TV channel.
Then, you can see the difference yet. In Germany, where I come from e.g. ARD. Eurotic TV, the image is blurry, the colors not genuine. The Studio does not properly illuminated. ARD, super picture, the faces look really sharp. The Studio bright and well lit... Conclusion: Well-intentioned from Eurotic TV and again once poorly made! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
michalis wrote:I agree with all the negative statements said about new studio but I am still puzzled why such an experince satellte broadcaster has come up with this weak contrast picture reception.Looked at videos direct from sat transmission about 2 months ago I would say that the contrast and frequecy response now is about 50% of those.If the satellite transmission( ie the uplink) path is still the same (why would it alter ) then I can only assume that the cameras or the studio edit /consul suit or cable path in the studio to the sat uplink has changed ,but has it changed by error or desire !because I have to admiit that the web picture has increased in clarity.I puzzled !.this is the main question: did they improve the quality of the webstream and at the same time lower the quality of the FTA signal by purpose or because they are amateurs? for me the FTA shows are no longer watchable or recordable - especially when they excessively work with long range shots of the central cam. Absolutely blurry. This is not an issue of the new studio in first place, perhaps not even an issue of the new 16:9 aspect ratio ( because at the same time other cams deliver a decent picture ) - it's rather likely that they fucked up some of the devices, the settings, the complete color management or the transmission of the signal of single cams. Personally I don't like the idea to watch the webstream of 'normal' shows because the picture is much smaller, the motion is less natural and the 'white circle' haunts me. And recording needs more efforts ... so maybe I should retire for some time and come back after 3 or 4 months to check if they improved the FTA or not. According to Christine there are no complains about bad picture quality on FTA - except mine
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with all the negative statements said about new studio but I am still puzzled why such an experince satellte broadcaster has come up with this weak contrast picture reception.Looked at videos direct from sat transmission about 2 months ago I would say that the contrast and frequecy response now is about 50% of those.If the satellite transmission( ie the uplink) path is still the same (why would it alter ) then I can only assume that the cameras or the studio edit /consul suit or cable path in the studio to the sat uplink has changed ,but has it changed by error or desire !because I have to admiit that the web picture has increased in clarity.I puzzled !.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Need to wait a bit, the studio soon to be better. They will change it. I hope they have a little fantasy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
too much small and too much dark
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are some problems with the depth of the studio - the camera crew seems not to be able to adjust the focus / depth of focus right: I see every little hole in the wall very sharp but the faces of the girls are kind of blurry. And especially the long range shots of the crane cam are extremely blurry - obvious on a tv screen and even noticable on a 15'' notebook.
16:9 is a good thing but it demands more skills and quality of equipment and stream/ satellite signal - there is no place for models as cam crew volunteers - bad picture quality is not sexy at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
love.giant wrote:Actually it's no wonder that everyone complains about the new studio, as it is in fact in the human nature to neglect everything new.Well, I think it actually takes time to adapt on both sides of the screen. Also the girls and the technical staff need to arrange with a new studio and not everything that worked in the old studio is still working in this huge hall. If they really want to stay with that for a longer time they will need additional themes (like for example a shower, glass bar, pole, pool, sports corner...) to fill empty space and give the girls the opportunity for different performances. But yeah, TL;DR: The new studio is horrendous. 16:9: 1 step forward, New studio: 2 MAJOR steps backwards. I hope it'll be just temporarilyActually if they don't increase resolution and bit rate 16:9 is also a step backwards. They only stretch the picture horizontally, so the actual dots per inch decrease. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
Actually it's no wonder that everyone complains about the new studio, as it is in fact in the human nature to neglect everything new.
I remember back when ETV had this 80-ish studio and somewhere down the line they changed into a new studio, which i and lots of other people weren't too fond of at first, but eventually everyone got into it. In this case however, i have to agree with everyone by saying that the new studio is indeed atrocious. The lightning is horrible, everything looks the same, no furniture, no colors, the only color they have is that depressing grey. Some say it looks like a warehouse, some say it looks like a shelter, or a dungeon, i say it looks like a bunker straight out of a zombie flick. And to be honest, i think it affects the shows in general. Usually i zapped in pretty frequently (at least when there were models who caught my interest) but since they got this studio i maybe watched ETV for 20 minutes since they launched it, at best and i got the feeling that the models aren't too much into the studio either. At least it looks like it to me, for instance, Roshana who always puts up great performances just feels... "bland" in this studio. And i don't know if it's a problem with my TV or a problem in general, but is it possible that the frames of the show are a bit "choppy"? The picture doesn't look as fluent as it used to be and i'm afraid i get a headache if i look at it too much. But yeah, TL;DR: The new studio is horrendous. 16:9: 1 step forward, New studio: 2 MAJOR steps backwards. I hope it'll be just temporarily |
|
|
|
|
|
My friend Illian 62 My son also sends messages but
luckily not to this forum,our thoughts often clash!! kind regards to you! 
|
|
|
|
bigalathome wrote:All the comments centered around the "new studio" are of You forgot to write that "The Wall". 
|
|
|
|
