Glamcams | Webcam site from Bluebird
- Pages (1):
- 1
| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
they were supposed to have a live sex show with anna lovato & cindy behr on friday 5th august but nothing happened.it was to be a 6 hour anything goes show but it finished up on adult work as a 2 hour show
|
|
|
|
|
|
True about babeslive BJ, but, you did get to see Caty Cole in all her glory, which MANY of us would have killed for!. Lucky
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have liitle confidence, too.
The idea is great - bb have some girls that I'm sure could generate a lot of callers. But I don't think the ones we most want to see are likely to do it and I expect it will end up the same as bs - one batch of gilrs primarily nude and only occasionally on tv, and the tv girls only occasionally on the cams but not showing anything - either way means disappointment (much the same as nudeblue now, infact). In bb's case probably worse as I think there may be more pressure on the girls 'who don't' and some may end up leaving. I also somehow suspect that being bb it will be more expensive than any of the other 1:1 sites too - I'm sure they'll find a way to screw us even if only by charging membership as well as for the call / performance. After all, they'll have overheads that mfc or glamourlounge don't and thats the market they'll be in. But having said that, I think the biggest problem which will send it the same direction as nudeblue and just as quickly, is the quality of the delivery. I don't think there's any chance it will last unless they do something about their webstream, which is variable in quality and even more variable in performance - streams freeze, lag or just don't come on, for hours on end, pretty much every night. (And its been the same since they 'relaunched' with nude so they've had well over a year to sort it.) That may be ok when most of the callers are watching on tv, but if the stream is the main form of delivery... how much will you pay to watch a series of fuzzy freeze frames that don't coincide with the conversation? And this is what they call "The best in webcam technology". Also their history of 'product launch' is not good - website, nudeblue, portal - all the same: good idea, badly delivered. Don't get me wrong, I haven't got a downer on bb - I want it to work, I'll be there if the rights girls are on, it should be great - but so should nudeblue have been... |
|
|
|
|
|
mrmann wrote:I don't hate Blu Bird or have it out for them, but I have my doubts about this site. A webcam site to me, implies that the women are comfortable with going nude in a one to one chat. If not, then I don't see a point in having a webcam site. You might get a few people that will be content with having a chat and maybe seeing some breasts, but you'll have many more who want to see full nudity. Cara Steel is beautiful, and I've seen her fully nude in a few photo shoots and in one advert on TV, yet she only does the day shows lately, which might mean she's tamed her ways. If I'm going to pay to talk to her, full frontal nudity will have to be present, or else it won't be worth it, not to me at least. Fingers crossed Yea, I don't really have high hopes of it either. That babeslive site they and sevral other channels use is rated as the worst camsite on the internet so it cant be worse then that. 
|
|
|
|
|
I don't hate Blu Bird or have it out for them, but I have my doubts about this site. A webcam site to me, implies that the women are comfortable with going nude in a one to one chat. If not, then I don't see a point in having a webcam site. You might get a few people that will be content with having a chat and maybe seeing some breasts, but you'll have many more who want to see full nudity. Cara Steel is beautiful, and I've seen her fully nude in a few photo shoots and in one advert on TV, yet she only does the day shows lately, which might mean she's tamed her ways. If I'm going to pay to talk to her, full frontal nudity will have to be present, or else it won't be worth it, not to me at least. Fingers crossed
I hope it is a good site though. |
|
|
|
- Pages (1):
- 1