Amber J - Chat/discussion

0 (0 rating(s))

(no rating yet)

Amateur models online
  • Pages (1):
  • 1
Author Posts

03.09.2015, 02:31

Amber J - Chat/discussion

Such a great addition, and yet her cameraman is ruining her current nude session by being so nervous and hesitant to show her lower half at all. What a waste! Hope she goes to Babestation. At least she'll have more freedom there. Maybe it's just an off night with this cameraman, but he's acting like a newbie.

08.09.2015, 19:01

Re: Amber J - Chat/discussion

I know Lol. I was just curious if you knew whether we'd see that footage or not. I did watch the session, but missed the shot of the extra camera.

05.09.2015, 07:23

Re: Amber J - Chat/discussion

they simply let it for themself, in that way, lately they can sell those and make money from.. in studio66 dot com videos or stuff like that.

04.09.2015, 16:30

Re: Amber J - Chat/discussion

Please mrmann, don't ask me to second guess what S66 do. All i can say is, it was being filmed by a second camera, why else would she be partly hidden from view if it wasn't for the want of more extreme shots. You have to bear in mind this wasn't a short sequence of filming when she was hidden. Not like a nervous cameraman panning away at the slightest chance of a slip. This girl lay there ''naked'' for what must have been an hour, in a position that was likely to show pussy. The brief glimpses you got of her lower body position told you that she was likely to be exposed.

If this had been some ordinary session, then surely she wouldn't have been so well protected. She would have been directed to put on her knickers, or at least change into a more modest position. Therefore letting the cameraman get a full length shot of her great body.

03.09.2015, 22:10

Re: Amber J - Chat/discussion

So while her lower half was out of shot at times, it was being filmed by another cameraman? I didn't notice any perv cam, so where will we see what he filmed?

03.09.2015, 17:46

Re: Amber J - Chat/discussion

This girl very often appeared with Lucy Alexandra on the cam shows, she was very nice then, but now she is nothing short of fucking gorgeous. A superb sexy, well toned body, to go with a friendly personality. But I can't help think that this is just another devious plot by S66 to get us to start paying for their streaming service. The camera man wasn't nervous of showing something that isn't allowed, it was done for one reason only, to get the backs up of the watchers who were hoping for more of the delectable Amber, But ordinary watchers were never going to get any sort of treat. For all the juicy bits were being filmed by a second camera man hidden to one side. When the session ended you got a glimpse of him as he left the shot.

Why people still telephone these shows is beyond me, ripped off every way you turn, but still the money keeps getting handed over. At one moment during Amber's performance last night, her top half almost left the screen through the top of the frame. Why do the callers not demand to see all of the model not just see her to her waistline. It would be better for the girl to wear panties and to be seen than to be presented in the way she was last night.

As i said that show was for streaming purposes only, And it will only get more and more selective, with the more attractive girls getting shows that are being filmed with another camera, and the least good looking getting the ordinary ''run of the mill'' shows. I am now beginning to understand why they have filled our screens with oldies from the past, I believe now we will see many more new girls coming along, but non- subscribers wont see their best shows. No, what we will see is a repeat of last nights Amber show, with the model hardly visible pushed up against the fucking ceiling
  • Pages (1):
  • 1