Studio 66 - General Discussion

3.64 (11 rating(s))

(3.64 / 5, 11 ratings)

Author Posts

12.03.2013, 04:47

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

The silliness continues with the bot Big Grin and could add at least 3 more caps like this Confused PS. Lou Lou is on but not that channel Tongue

09.03.2013, 14:54

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

Sounds more like a way for them to know more information about the customers, and not just to see whether they are 18 years old or not... That's my conspiracy theorist self Big Grin

09.03.2013, 06:47

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

(Face Palm) Big Grin

05.03.2013, 19:28

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

Here is an update to the previous query, since I have been in touch with both Jamie & Alan about this issue. Here was their response.

"This is a temporary issue and R18 content will be accessible again shortly to all users that are age-verified to the requirements of ATVOD. Although members may have made a declaration that they are over 18, that alone is not rigorous enough.

We shall shortly have an automated system in place to authenticate member. This will require full name, address and date of birth (and in some cases, passport or driving licence details) which will be verified securely against systems that are approved by ATVOD. These details must be the same as those by which the member has signed up. Once age-verified as over 18, they will have access to R18 content for the duration of your membership.

The automated system shall be active within the next few days.

However, in the meantime, we can manually check credentials providing they send the required information to us at
verification@studio66tv.com along with the username to which they relate. This process should normally be done within 1 business day.

If you would like us to manually process you, please provide us with the following:-

1. The username to your Studio66 membership
2. The method by which you joined the site
3. Your full name
4. Your address including postcode.
5. Your date of birth

As mentioned above, it may be necessary to request further information in the form of a passport number or driving licence number. It may speed up the process if you provide them with your first response to questions 1-5 above.

Please do not send us scans of your documentation. The information itself is sufficient.

Many thanks for your patience.
"

I hope that info clears it up for everyone.

Ace.

03.03.2013, 21:04

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

Actually iPure said something about it about a month ago. It's a new ruling that effects websites that have video on demand. As iPure said they were going to have to implement age verification because of their adult video on demand section. Not sure why this whould effect Studio66 though, as they don't have a Video on demand service. Confused

Addition: I forgot that non members can pay £3 per vid to watch & download. So they do have a video on demand service.

03.03.2013, 20:39

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

BADMANZ wrote:Any idea why Studio 66 aren't uploading some of their scheduled videos? They had a video of Katie K scheduled for, i think, Wednesday, and a video of Sophia Knight and Allie Haze, which is scheduled for today. Both videos are shown when you view any of the other videos, but when you click on them, it takes you back to the videos page. Kinda annoying when they can't stick to their schedule...

Apparently it's something to do with needing a more rigorous age verification system. You need to get in touch with them about it. http://www.studio66tv.com/customerservice.asp
The whole affair has been very badly communicated, with no notice of this coming from the channel reps themselves. I only knew because someone posted the information on another forum, and he only found out by accident.

03.03.2013, 18:39

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

Any idea why Studio 66 aren't uploading some of their scheduled videos? They had a video of Katie K scheduled for, i think, Wednesday, and a video of Sophia Knight and Allie Haze, which is scheduled for today. Both videos are shown when you view any of the other videos, but when you click on them, it takes you back to the videos page. Kinda annoying when they can't stick to their schedule...

03.03.2013, 11:17

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

The bot just tweeted that Becky and Rachel are on now but then was corrected to just Becky, it will be fun just reading its tweets i think Big Grin

01.03.2013, 20:48

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

dazaman wrote:
quiquems wrote:The guy of this twitter account is the most incompetent I've ever seen Cool
[hidden link - please register]
[hidden link - please register]


Or he is working for another channel. Lmao

He posted Ashley Emma was on one day on the day show a few days ago he posted.

Gemma Massey was doing a day show rather than Gemma Hiles (reminds me of another company that know fuck all of what there promoting)

I would say it was a Twitterbot doing the posting not a actual person because take the day Gemma Hiles was doing a Day-show but the twitter page said it was Gemma Massey if you went onto the studio 66 website while Gemma Hiles was on you had to click on Gemma Massey's profile to view the stream she was on.

So i guess the twitterbot is linked to the profile's somehow an automatically posts a tweet when a profile goes live that the person is on webcam or on tv screen so if Studio 66 put the wrong profile up like in the Hiles/Massey example it will automatically tweet that the wrong girl is live on air or webcam.

For those that don't know a Twitterbot is a program used to produce automated posts via the Twitter microblogging service

01.03.2013, 20:43

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

And a few minutes ago, that account tweeted that Gemma Hiles was on. Fair enough, it is her profile pic listed on the website, but when you tune in, it is of course Gemma Jane Blush
I've followed and unfollowed that account twice now. The first time I got fed up with them was when it was Neil Simon doing it and basically turning it into a plug for his own blog and his favourite girls, who had nothing to do with the channel. Then I gave it another go, but the final straw came when they were shamelessly plugging Danica's pics last year while she was on CBB. What ever happened to promoting your own girls?
This latest fiasco just goes to show it's not worth following, unless it's for the comedy value Thumb down

01.03.2013, 19:54

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

quiquems wrote:The guy of this twitter account is the most incompetent I've ever seen Cool
[hidden link - please register]
[hidden link - please register]


Or he is working for another channel. Lmao

He posted Ashley Emma was on one day on the day show a few days ago he posted.

Gemma Massey was doing a day show rather than Gemma Hiles (reminds me of another company that know fuck all of what there promoting)

01.03.2013, 14:05

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

The guy of this twitter account is the most incompetent I've ever seen Cool




Or he is working for another channel. Lmao

23.02.2013, 14:57

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

I think some nude 2-4-1s like Red Light allows would be great to see on Studio 66, maybe even some 3-4-1s Big Grin

23.02.2013, 06:48

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

Very pleasant and unexpected surprise to see Mica Martinez back on the Studio66 schedule. Big Grin Now if he gets Emily Dean & Hannah Prentice back as well, it will virtually be the old squad back together.again. Cool Then all we'll need is the old style 2-4-1's back. Thumb up

08.02.2013, 17:53

Re: Studio 66 - General Discussion

Interesting - two channels in one Big GrinBig GrinBig Grin