| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The_Feeling wrote:Well your wish was fulfilled but after you went to bed. no creamed legs for leggie during daytime 
|
|
|
|
|
|
klemi wrote:Of course it means 20 out of 24 hours of total disaster programm Let's wait for the new regulations for the nighttime. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
The_Feeling wrote:Yes the question on your tongues.... what is the reason she joins an erotic channel? Yes, what's the reason they do this job? Well, they're not living in Germany, and social security is something they only can dream of. There are certainly less appealing and worse paid jobs than ETV in their home country, and as long as they can cope with the emotional load of this job, it's just a job. Nobody should think bad about them doing it. And regarding reputation - I think this job is much more reputable than... for instance... being a well reputed and highly paid manager of a big company, who exploits his employees, and pollutes the environment with the production process of his company. And I can think of many more examples. This so-called reputation is just part of society's double standards, like so many other things. |
|
|
|
The_Feeling wrote:...Sorry if it sounds like attacking You.... i just meant that Evah is not quite soft model.. but as You wished "no discussion about the attributes being a soft or a hot model" Sorry 1 more time. |
|
|
|
|
The_Feeling wrote:...So soft models lick other nipples? IMO it's not soft model behaviour. If yes i would like to see all soft models like Evah 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yasmine1 wrote:If you read my previous posts you will know I have much respect to the girls but I am beginning to think that you either don't bother or whenever you run into a word sentence you don't like you comment and stop your reading. I don't think I have ever criticized a model (beside once Clio for responding impolitely to a viewer) my criticism is always about the channel not the poor girl working there trying to make a living .... I am very impressed with your opinions, but why waste your time to respond to some of the petty people, all they care is the defense of etv, because just they saw a girl at TV. Regardless of who she is or what she doing . |
|
|
|
The_Feeling wrote:Last night show from Evah is sure only an exception a replacement for another girl! Well! There is the comitate for the human rights...I write that the girls can't be free to make them choices? No, I haven't written this. They are free, well for them, but it doesn't means that they are totally innocent if and when the camera supports them...they are conscious of the expectative of the viewers...therefore bye bye money. Therefore I think that there isn't always need of this defence, if they don't fullfill the requests. This job isn't right for some girls?...it's difficult to find another job? Maybe, but until those girls make this type of job, themselves are part of the channel. A lot of time it seems to discuss about a church: what a shame! An hot nudity..what a shame! Some saints who makes this job...poor girls, the life is been ruthless with them. Anyway, you speak of respect...you believe to be respectful when you say this isn't a right job for them: are they more special of others? The other girls in other channel are less intelligent? Only in the other channels the girls choose to make that job, instead in etv the management kidnap the girls against them will? It's better change the name of the channel, no more 'eurotic TV', it's better call it 'Innocent souls...please, help them' |
|
|
|
|
bellerophon wrote:Thursday’s photoshoot show was yet another fascinating insight into the psyche of etv’s strangest director. All those obsessions show after show after show – the obsession with red, white and black; the obsession with fetish; the obsession with making an ever more bizarre-looking Marayah the “star” of the show in terms of cameratime. You don't worry, I think in the Friday nightshow the cameratime is been at favour of your favourite model (in absence of the other two); or at least, before to fall asleep*, I'm sure that in the first hour (11:00-00:00) is been so. *The better sleeping pill show in the history of this channel .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 It's getting too mutch for me .... Gia & Lia together in a show ..and than also they interact with eachtother ..it's just What are they doïng to me ..or should i say ..what are they doïng with me Kind Regards Shaky |
|
|
|
|
|
Yasmine1 wrote:dazaman wrote:So by your logic Yasmine1 anybody with a different view to yours is wrong or if proven right they work for ETV? correct me if i am wrong on that You started without me ...   .This is a bad assumption to make ... I (oops, sorry) The ETV employee could be here in my/his/her spare time and not sanctioned to make official statements ... 
|
|
|
|
Legxpert wrote:Your speculations and conspiracy theories are just very amusing. And when u call a model why should she tell you lies, especially about such banal things you always worry and argue about?As I told you once if you want to have a decent discussion on this pages without any sarcastic remarks I have no problem to have it you may even succeed to convice me to change my mind (wont be easy) ..... Now back to the topic Speculation yes conspiracy no ! You are either naive or not too smart if you think this is a banal thing ! since day one ETV is using what ever methods to cover their strategy and it is working you never know what to expect from a show, you never know if a girl will reveal more than she did ... there are shows which are totally boring and censored you name it and then you have days where you don't stop to praise the show ... This what keeps the interest in watching ETV if you will know that for example Gia will show no more than she did many people will lose interest in watching her (no don't comment I said many not all) There are still members here who still didn't abandon their hope on Evah and Brona and I can give you more examples ... So do you really think that a model will reveal ETV's strategy risking it to be posted here for the common knowledge ?? and even if she reveals it to one of her virtual lovers do you really think he will post it ?? Legxpert wrote:Remember, after all at the end of the line is also a human being If you read my previous posts you will know I have much respect to the girls but I am beginning to think that you either don't bother or whenever you run into a word sentence you don't like you comment and stop your reading. I don't think I have ever criticized a model (beside once Clio for responding impolitely to a viewer) my criticism is always about the channel not the poor girl working there trying to make a living .... |
|
|
|
|
Yasmine1 wrote:my post is flawed as much as yours !! Well I guess we can readily agree on this. Yasmine1 wrote:[ but don't overrule other ideas Sorry to point it out to you, but you do this al the time. Don't punch if you can't take a hit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yasmine1 wrote:Well well I was really missing my leg fetishist friend with his smart yet sarcastic remarks who sometimes delete his own posts to save the embarrassment , just a short quotation about blinds "Thou art figured blind, and yet we borrow our best sight from thee" Your speculations and conspiracy theories are just very amusing. And when u call a model why should she tell you lies, especially about such banal things you always worry and argue about? Remember, after all at the end of the line is also a human being
|
|
|
|
Legxpert wrote:Yasmine1 wrote:And yes you are right having more info just by talking to a model for example will not mean that this is right or wrong. Well well I was really missing my leg fetishist friend with his smart yet sarcastic remarks who sometimes delete his own posts to save the embarrassment , just a short quotation about blinds "Thou art figured blind, and yet we borrow our best sight from thee" |
|
|
|
