Eurotic TV - General Discussion

Well, it seems the last question was too difficult so I'll change the subject ...

Just caught one of the Sandra / Clio fights ...
... oh! Clio .... wish you were on screen more often ...

Watcher wrote:

Yasmine1 wrote:Or in summary for the not so hard thinkers I say "Viewers = Potential callers"

Potential caller = Potential income to ETV = absolutely nothing.

If ETV were to put on your ideal show, would you call, or just not have enough hands?

Well the previous rude response was removed and here is another one , great !! Well Watcher I guess you have already figured it out how to overcome the problem with the hands , so at least share it with us ...

Watcher wrote:

Yasmine1 wrote:Or in summary for the not so hard thinkers I say "Viewers = Potential callers"

Potential caller = Potential income to ETV = absolutely nothing.

If ETV were to put on your ideal show, would you call, or just not have enough hands?

My phone is with "without cable"

Yasmine1 wrote:Or in summary for the not so hard thinkers I say "Viewers = Potential callers"

Potential caller = Potential income to ETV = absolutely nothing.

If ETV were to put on your ideal show, would you call, or just not have enough hands?

Or in summary for the not so hard thinkers I say "Viewers = Potential callers"

Watcher wrote:

Merc wrote:all the callers are viewers.
no viewers=no callers

Ok, for the hard of thinking, let me explain:-

A caller picks up the phone, calls ETV and talks to a model.

A viewer does not do the above.

If you want to text/SMS/VIP then what you do with your money is up to you.

for the smart guys:
if the viewer is not interested in what he sees, the viewer will never pick up his phone and become a caller.
soooooooooo...if you do a interesting show you have more chance that the lazy viewers pick up their phones and call the girls.

Merc wrote:LMAO I guess the sharks are enjoying the big lunch..

The result:

The agony (1) and the end (2)

Merc wrote:all the callers are viewers.
no viewers=no callers

Ok, for the hard of thinking, let me explain:-

A caller picks up the phone, calls ETV and talks to a model.

A viewer does not do the above.

If you want to text/SMS/VIP then what you do with your money is up to you.

vappiano68 wrote:see a shower feat. Gia and...another always disturbing presence ...

And it's not the first time this happens...

I agree with vappiano68 about the presence ( if i understand it correctly ) Why ?? because there was a nice solo view of Gia's popo ( ) and suddenly there was also the a**of Lilian next to Gia's and this was somthing i did not expect because i finaly thought the camera is on Gia with nobody around her so full cam on her ...but than Lilian came next to her .And there was also ofcourse the shower scene with thesame result

Kind Regards
Shaky

Merc wrote:all the callers are viewers.
no viewers=no callers

Of course this is correct but concerning Gia's style of performance it seems irrelevant.Equating her lack of nudity to lack of calls or texts is merely guess work.I am a big fan of hers and always watch her,so judge my opinions on that if you wish.She is very rarely off the phones,even when sat doing nothing and does receive a lot of texts.She rarely fulfills these because they ask,usually,for more nudity than she is comfortable with.I'm sure the texter must know this and it is a testament to her popularity that these texts keep getting sent,even though they are mostly unfulfilled.I guess they are sent in the hope that one day she will do these things.Her shows have nearly always had the same level of explicitness until recently when she has shown more and put on what I believe to be some of the best shows seen on ETV.If I sent a text,it would be a carefully worded,speculative text asking for a little more from a girl I like.I don't understand these texts requesting a 'fullstrip' sent to girls who you know full well will show everything if you just sit and wait and watch the TV.You should send a text for something you haven't seen and cross your fingers that the girl is in the mood for it that evening.This applies to any girl.This is why I believe Gia receives so many texts to do more than she normally would.It is a great money maker for the channel and the texter,I'm sure,knows that there is little chance of their text being fulfilled but still a slim chance anyway.Nearly all of these texts include Gia's name in them so that suggests some sort of familiarity with her and her performance so I'm sure the texter still gets a 'buzz' from sending them thinking maybe this time they will get their wish.
The bottom line is that what she does seems to make money for the channel,more than enough to allow her to continue on nights exclusively doing the unique performances she does.If the lack of nudity or fulfillment of text requests was a problem for the owners of ETV then I'm sure it would have been sorted out some time over the last three or so years that Gia has been on this channel.

Dreamlander

vappiano68 wrote:Usually, when I go to a restaurant, I don't ask for the best and the worst foods at the same time...

(obviously: the video has been thrown to the sharks...)

LMAO I guess the sharks are enjoying the big lunch..

Watcher wrote:The viewers are irrelevant, it's the callers paying the bills.

Only one thing is strange...:

I find very curious that, among all the requests for Gia (callers paying the bills, I suppose) , sistematically ignored, the only fulfilled request is that one which forces us to see a shower feat. Gia and...another always disturbing presence ...

And it's not the first time this happens...

Usually, when I go to a restaurant, I don't ask for the best and the worst foods at the same time...

(obviously: the video has been thrown to the sharks...)

all the callers are viewers.
no viewers=no callers

Ay ay Sir emperor! Good statement to my content! No word to that what I mean - just attacking my certain generalization with "viewers". Free declaring of opinion - is it possible here in your sight? I also accept the etv defenders' statements, so also accept mine without commenting them like a teacher. Okay?

@helmi
Speak only for yourself, it's all you're qualified to do.
The viewers are irrelevant, it's the callers paying the bills.