| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
love.giant wrote:xmsx80 wrote:From the wall: It seems that "WK" is real. So now he starts to insult other people, meaning of sod: in german "(blöde) Sau", in italian "stronzo". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
xmsx80 wrote:From the wall: obviously etv has realised that insulting their fans doesnt work, so they do it with fake etv wall postings like this. thats why i dont even bother ripping this jamokes posts apart. the trolling was obvious with the statement 'if u dont like it, spend more money on it' right. i dont like rock music, so i'm gonna buy every album. makes perfect sense. or 'i know not every wish can be fullfilled.' well people who love to gamble with their money usually go to vegas. if someone spends their hard earned money for a show they should get to see it, its not gambling. but yeah, subtle try from the etv team to insult their fans, as usual |
|
|
|
|
From the wall:
WK Thursday, 7th May 2015 I thought the night was bloody excellent! I do send in quite a number of requests, but I'm realistic and I realise that they cant all, always be fulfilled, expecting that would be a bit silly and unrealistic. To my way of thinking, we send in our requests, and they usually get fulfilled. Sometimes, it may be a slight modified version, to combine two request into one. That's fair enough. After all, we pay only 4 credits for a request, its hardly a fortune. We get to see some great shows, so its really good value. Being sensible, we must realise that with so many requests and so varied, that we wont always enjoy each exclusive. For example, I hate brown tights/pantyhose, I really hate them, they are terrible things. BUT we are like different things, and ETV have to try and keep everyone happy. So fair enough. Now if someone wasn't happy, I would suggest that they pay more money and have a reserved, or even look at one of the hundreds of webcam sites. Needless to say, the webcam sites are inferior and much more costly, but if you aren't happy, then go where you might be (even though its more expensive, lower quality, and not the same girls). Must admit, I see a few messages sometimes, complaining because some silly child wanted something exactly one way, and it was slightly different. My reply would be easy: Grow up, get a life and relax, look how much you pay for what you get, and shut up, miserable sod lol sit back and enjoy  Like the rest of us do
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
does anybody knows if Jasmine reserved today was a show or it was the usual boring reserved boring "show"? thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Too soft even for a low acceptable soft standard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isadora is a bored Model for Premium...... Bad Show !
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilsonsand wrote:Wilsonsand wrote:site is down for me I had no problems. Site worked the whole time. |
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:goldy wrote:suggestion for etv-team: i remember that, it was maybe 2 or 3 years ago; but stream did not work properly and they finally remove this service. My idea is similar but with some differences; for example remote camera is not needed if you have 3 or 4 cams with the right angle. The price could be the same as now for 2 reasons: 1) much more people will be involved to watch excl cause they can choose their favourite cam 2) using adobe media server it's not difficoult to create a new stream, so they dont spend money to develop it. |
|
|
|
|
|
goldy wrote:suggestion for etv-team: We had that already. More or less. One internet stream was used for kind of preview of all cameras. One was used for the tilting camera which could be operated by one viewer remotely. Iirc the preview was 0,2 and the remote cam 1 credit per minute. Those 2 streams are now used for the reserved exclusives and the exclusive / premium shows. |
|
|
|
|
|
suggestion for etv-team:
exclusive shows seem working fine; so why dont you let the viewers to choose cam view? That's my suggestion: view #1 = as is now, with a director choice view #2 = fixed frontal cam view #3 = fixed close up cam view #4 = fixed full view(girls, studio, lights...) view #5 = .......... People, what do you think about? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexpectedly sexy start to Stella's Photo Shoot Premiums.
  Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
stegiato wrote:I never said things like this, but i think that the only solution after the last weeks of Exclusive and NS is stopping buying exclusive. dude, i already wrote this, i think about 2-3 months ago, when they went to sky uk and the only type of nudity where topless shows. ever since then i didnt care for etv, i send maybe 1 vip message for 1 show when they didnt do exclusives and that was it. i didnt even watch the channel. long story short: its time that people put their money where their mouth is and realize that etv is ripping them off. and really? they called a FAN a 'vulgar wanker' for having a oppinion? sorry but those dtv douchebags lost even more respect, didnt expect that that was possible. ultimately: sure, you can voice your oppinion on the etv wall but 1: they just answer with some bla-bla to justify themselves and 2: they just don't give a crap. they are so gung-ho on the fact that everything they do is right, that they dont make mistakes and that they can insult their fanbase and that everyone has to welcome everything they do. etv has lowered their bar so much that a 'good show' nowadays would have been considered trash 1-2 years ago. the next day, after everyones done praising the show, they are back to the same old crap. but yeah as i said: the only way to hurt them and male them listen to u and maybe even for them stopping to talk down on their fans is by stop giving them your money, even though i dont think people will understand that and etv will turn into a bottom of the barrell wannabe art show, but we'll see |
|
|
|
|
|
reading the "Body Oil" topic in ETV wall, and after Jonas comment (i agree with him), i find all words from ETV are to say the horrible torture performance was an idea from the models. Not a single word about daniel, WK, flavio, fabri d and jonas about censorship. Not a single word about that. Not after treating one of the customers as a vulgar wanker and after the apologies. Obviously is very unconfortable for them to talk about the increasing of censorhip, and they look to other direction for not talking about that. I guess maybe it´s difficult to explain why censor oil, doggy views or basic instinct shows when they were perfectly allowed 2 months ago and why not censoring so much boring pantyhose and fetisch feet, soles.. and childish tickle shows.
Lot of words to explain if there was something bad with the sado torture performance put the blame on the models as it was their idea and they were very happy doing it. This part "they expressed no problems whatsoever with fulfilling this artistic task with pleasure " of the message make me think it was of course not their own idea. And the idea fit very well with some two woman in the direction staff tastes. Thay have left open the door to the critics about the sado show, (so maybe someone there agree as they also talk about "restrain" or "ban" this type of show) maybe it´s time for those who didn´t like it, or don´t like this kind of show to kick their ass sending their opinions to the wall. I did. |
|
|
|
stegiato wrote:I never said things like this, but i think that the only solution after the last weeks of Exclusive and NS is stopping buying exclusive. that's the only way to teach them we can go back if they change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I never said things like this, but i think that the only solution after the last weeks of Exclusive and NS is stopping buying exclusive.
|
|
|
