Last night's show

lucifer70 wrote:I am really sick of seeing feet, leggings, muscles, balloons, shoes, feet licked or covered with a cream, catfight, candles, wax, and the whole series of nonsense that almost every night we have to see.

Ofcourse you have called and sent sms's to get the kind of show you like....

This stuff is not my cup of tea either, but obviously people are willing to pay to see this, so who are you to complain about this?

klemi wrote:Surely we witnessed one of the worst shows in history, but not because of the girls. Everything surrounding the models is done in such a ridiculous way that even girls lost hope probably...It was a disaster all the way and today will be no better. Because it cant be. Same people doing it as last thursday, same studio, same equipment. And last night there we saw again how lack of inventory causes a terrible show. They have one big bed with Lace on it so others show pussies in standing position. This is hilarious and far worse then in 2007. And aftershow the same catastrophy, except one short Gia scene.

You have absolutely right.
I am really sick of seeing feet, leggings, muscles, balloons, shoes, feet licked or covered with a cream, catfight, candles, wax, and the whole series of nonsense that almost every night we have to see. This is not an erotic show is more like the waiting room of a psychiatrist.
I want to know, out of curiosity, but who has decided to place the camera in that way during the afterhours?

Surely we witnessed one of the worst shows in history, but not because of the girls. Everything surrounding the models is done in such a ridiculous way that even girls lost hope probably...It was a disaster all the way and today will be no better. Because it cant be. Same people doing it as last thursday, same studio, same equipment. And last night there we saw again how lack of inventory causes a terrible show. They have one big bed with Lace on it so others show pussies in standing position. This is hilarious and far worse then in 2007. And aftershow the same catastrophy, except one short Gia scene.

bellero wrote:

yasmine wrote:

of course i agree with you, there is no enough light, and there is no good zoom , and most of the girls had ignored. this is what we all always complain of it. But don't forget there were eight girls, this made the director to choose this path. can you imagine how many handheld cameras need to eight girls. unfortunately etv chosen the path of greed and avarice instead of satisfy the viewers .

with all the mess this days in etv i think that the director accomplished a hard work successfully there is no director else can do. also must not forget that cameramen have a large stake in this mess. there are some cameramen think of themselves as they are bosses in the channel and no one is imposing them what they are doing. and siding to some of the girls which they like. How many times we have seen some of the girls pointing with their hands to cameraman and ignored.
Finally, all what we see is just a ridiculous game from the administration,believe me they know all this.

My below update has nothing against the models or meant to criticizes any of the models appearing in the last shows I am sure most of them are trying hard to do the utmost to please the viewers/callers/SMS writers unfortunately ETV is doing their utmost to hamper these efforts ....

Well obviously what bothers with the camera is the fact that many scenes are shot from the distance especially the hot scenes - unfortunately very very rare recently !
Didn't see much of last night show just a quick browse of my recording but basically it looked like a very mild show and this applies to all shows as of Friday, the last good show was a week ago (Thursday).
It appears once again we are under sticked rules with only one or two participants (Kia , Lin, or Jannie) to my point of view Gia is now less hot than she was her scene with Kally was mild ( i hope none of you forgot her scene with Angelina and this was done when only one hand was available). Unfortunately one interesting bit of Gia in the after hour show needed the use of binoculars, in fact the hot one hour after hour show is now nearly most of the time reduced to 15 minutes until 03:30am you may get a flash here and there but that it .
Only two highlights of this week are Kally's shower scene and Shelley's after hour outing
Lowlight of this week was Monday show confirming what I have said short after Scarlet's return...
Let hope Gisele and Natasha will save the show tonight though I have a feeling that we want get a repeat of Natasha's last show - I hope I am wrong ...

something really strange . i don't know how some people see these shows . and how to object to what is good. are you happy to jump and swing the cameras. instead of a static cameras which is comfortable to see and neck. seems that you accustomed with the vexing cameras and forgot the golden past days .

last night everything was good . except one thing ??

bellerophon wrote:It was nice of Joanna to step in for Lilian at short notice. I wonder though how many of the other 30 girls were asked? Some of them might have been more suitable for a night show. Well, almost anybody might have been more suitable......

On the other hand Joanna turning up covering every centimetre of her body in funereal black seemed curiously appropriate to a show which looked as if they had all just been gathered together and told they had lost their jobs.

No handheld camera (yet again) - and this time the "director" (I wonder who....) was unable/unwilling to do more than a tiny number of close-ups with the studio camera on zoom. He/she seemed more intent on seeing how many girls he/she could get into every frame. The cutaways were breathtaking in their incompetence.

Even Kally, Kia and Gia couldn't do anything with this. Did Lace move at all?

Those behind the camera appear to have no idea,or just don't care about,what quality 'product' they have in front of the camera and it continues to astound me how they make money on a nightly basis.Run correctly,like a 'business' with passion,imagination and creativity,a natural 'greed to succeed' even,we the viewer/caller/texter could rightly expect 2,3 or maybe 4 channels like this from them,all making money and all catering to the various interests/fetishes that are obviously out there.Unfortunately,it is run like a rich man's personal play thing where forward thinking business acumen seems to take a back seat as long as certain long serving staff both in front of and behind the camera are enjoying themselves.
On a lighter note,with reference to Lace,I think she knew what to expect and just left a cardboard cut-out of herself in the studio and had an early night! I'm sure the other girl's wished they had done the same thing!

Dreamlander

Tarl_Cabot wrote:but to be serious: more a naked show than a good show.
Randa was great and proved again that she should be more often in a night show (also for some newer models to learn something) but in general it was the well known Hans chaos who should concentrate more on the directors job than on the Zias moderator job (who was even supported by Clio for some mins).
Maybe a economical successful show but not a pleasure for the viewers.

This is the first time i agree with you about something

about last night:

something's wrong on the pic, maybe you'll find the mistake

just this hint: italian Mod last night was Clio

[hidden link - please register]


but to be serious: more a naked show than a good show.
Randa was great and proved again that she should be more often in a night show (also for some newer models to learn something) but in general it was the well known Hans chaos who should concentrate more on the directors job than on the Zias moderator job (who was even supported by Clio for some mins).
Maybe a economical successful show but not a pleasure for the viewers.

sucker wrote:Last night, the worst case in camera work.
In molvania corporal punishment should be reintroduced.
The so called "director" from last night should be the first.

Lace is the best person to fulfil your desire. I'm sure she would enjoy it.

jost54 wrote:

Tarl_Cabot wrote:if a very explicit show in an erotic show is a reason for a praise we will have to praise Janine for the After Hour.
even at the end of this year we will probably confirm that this After Hour was probably one of the most explicit hours of the complete year.

I guess, the night show was one of the worst and afterwards Janine was allowed to do more ? Pity I have not recorded.

she was very explicit in the night show, too.
but I made the post about the AH before I reviewed the night show.

Janine was for 1 hour the hot centre of the night show, too.

Tarl_Cabot wrote:if a very explicit show in an erotic show is a reason for a praise we will have to praise Janine for the After Hour.
even at the end of this year we will probably confirm that this After Hour was probably one of the most explicit hours of the complete year.

I guess, the night show was one of the worst and afterwards Janine was allowed to do more ? Pity I have not recorded.

hey guys--you should know me by now ha ha. Please don"t take all my posts seriously. I try to inject a bit of much needed humour into the forum. The "cracker" description reffered to me not being around the forum since xmas. But I was serious about Kia and Gia. They are top models just now--when they get airtime. Its just the same old eurotic --hide the popular models to increase call traffic. And where has all the oil shows gone ??? Please Lillian--do more night shows with your buckets of creammmmm ha ha--bye guys

Although I didn't know who was the director but he was a good Somewhat . and of course there was also a lot of mistakes , but that's all what we want, it's non put the camera on trivialities and girls who have no calls, and every thing will be okay .