| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
am I the only one who experienced freezing picture every second during today's FTA show with Lara (on Astra)??
Well, maybe I was the only 'viewer' ... actually I didn't watch live - recorded parts of it  Maybe this was because they changed the icon in the upper right-hand corner of the screen to 'etv show live' - never change a running system, my molvanian bros! 
|
|
|
|
|
Lauren reply could be reduced directly, it is not forced to look at, a polite way to the customer to banish him off-channel,
the show is otherwise been good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
robert wrote:Watcher wrote:I'm sorry 'robert' but why did you quote my response to JFZola's post? It must be the lateness of the hour but I've gone back to my original post and I can see no reference to "freeloading" or any attempt to "push" anything. So I do not watch all of the shows all of the time but I can clearly recall messages waiting on the plasma for extended periods until the model was free to respond or other cases when a different model would respond to say that the intended model was busy with a caller. |
|
|
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:I'm sorry 'robert' but why did you quote my response to JFZola's post? Because the real argument against this is not about freeloading which seems to be what you (and ETV) are trying to push. Watcher wrote:But to reply to your question: it has always been the case that a model would not respond to a message until she had finished speaking with a caller; I can see no reason for that to change. Really? Really? It wasn't in the day shows at the end of last year. i can see no reason to believe it has improved since. |
|
|
|
|
|
robert wrote:Watcher wrote:It's quite simple: if you like the models/shows then why should you not be prepared to contribute to their incomes; if you do not, then what the hell are you doing here? I'm sorry 'robert' but why did you quote my response to JFZola's post? I can see no connection to what you wrote. But to reply to your question: it has always been the case that a model would not respond to a message until she had finished speaking with a caller; I can see no reason for that to change. |
|
|
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:It's quite simple: if you like the models/shows then why should you not be prepared to contribute to their incomes; if you do not, then what the hell are you doing here? And why should I pay 1 credit per minute to wait on the line while a model performs a web exclusive for another guy for 4 credits in total? Or am I supposed to move from the comfort of my tv, swap phones,login to my pc, pay a credit etc etc so I too can "enjoy" the performance at 1 credit per minute whilst she is supposed to be talking to me? Or do I just hang up the phone and ask what the hell am I doing here? |
|
|
|
|
Does this forum is free, there is nowhere I understand not mentioned that it would be forced to spend money on ETV-support, or am I wrong, I think it is every member of their own case.
|
|
|
|
|
akreb wrote:did i say anything about livestream ?, i would download 4k shows , as many members download etv recorded showsJFZola wrote:so should we pay for hot shows? i.would prefer pay for a 4k soft explicit 24h shows rather than a fake 720p nightime one |
|
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:JFZola wrote:so should we pay for hot shows? i.would prefer pay for a 4k soft explicit 24h shows rather than a fake 720p nightime one i like to be here ,any problem? i like models but i woudnt watch them for money , |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JFZola wrote:so should we pay for hot shows? i.would prefer pay for a 4k soft explicit 24h shows rather than a fake 720p nightime one It's quite simple: if you like the models/shows then why should you not be prepared to contribute to their incomes; if you do not, then what the hell are you doing here? |
|
|
|
|
|
JFZola wrote:so should we pay for hot shows? i.would prefer pay for a 4k soft explicit 24h shows rather than a fake 720p nightime one 4k resolution? are you insane? did you ever watch a 4k livestream? It would require about 15MB/s of bandwith 
|
|
|
|
|
so should we pay for hot shows? i.would prefer pay for a 4k soft explicit 24h shows rather than a fake 720p nightime one
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the end we come to the conclusion that's our own fault, maybe we think too egoistic. Here are people from whole Europe - with less and more money left for ETV.
I remember some years ago. I sent in almost every show with Randa VIP's with wishes or compliments. I was never angry about other viewers, which could see (my) show for free. Rather the opposite: I was proud to have caused this show and was even more proud when there was a video of it here in this forum the next day. Exactly this way the shows worked for years and in my opinion ETV should make a break at this point with wanting more money! |
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:BornExtreme wrote:....Who pays, in my opinion, must have at least the decency to don't require an exclusive show in a NightShow... It's not too much for me, because the NightShows were born with other intentions...you can require an exclusive from 7.00 am to 22.00 pm, what's the problem? The Nightshows are a historic part of this channel, and can't be touched. At last, it's your choice to pay, you can't judge who doesn't want to spend their moneys in this product. |
|
|
