Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Scottishbloke wrote:

mrmann wrote:10:26pm and she's already buck naked!

This perv cam crap might actually be a good idea... The women seem more excited by it. Camera dudes are a little too cautious though.

Although you made your post on the Amanda Rendall Thread I feel this needs to be given a more general answer. The majority of the time I am largely in agreement with you, however on this occasion I'm singing from a different hymn sheet. Throughout the course of the night I have seen several sessions being ruined as a consequence of Perv Cam

I've seen Amanda, Lori and Kimberley all take their panties off only for the camera to only focus on their top half. The idea of Perv Cam can work if its done properly but when all the focus is on that and taken off the actual show then it makes for a poor session unfortunately.

I do know how much you seem to enjoy recording Lori's shows, Scottishbloke; and I really do appreciate these uploads. But, unfortunately, Lori does not perform for this type of nudity (perv cam). Whilst the perv cams operate we will only see Lori's legs firmly shut, apart from when she is wearing panties. The type of shows that you clearly enjoy from Lori will unfortunately be a thing of the past.

With only Studio66 as competition it was always inevitable that the form of Babestation was always going to take a nose dive at some point but I still have faith in the long term wellbeing of this channel unlike S66 where I washed my hands of a long long time ago. Amanda Rendall coming backing a definite + point and once BS drop the whole concept of a need for Pervcam then I'm sure everything will settle down again. Would I like to see Morgan Preece back on the nightshows, ofcourse I would. She has always been one of my favourites and seeing her all wrapped up knowing what went previous is very very frustrating

Rallkin123 wrote:yeah, why do the cameramen on all the babestation channels always seem to film the girls who are naked from the waist up? they seem to do it a lot lately and i find it annoying and irritating. i thought babestation was an adult tv station, not a day time programme. please babestation bosses, don't take us viewers for idiots and show us more full nudity, top as well as bottom half and not focusing mostly on the top half when they are naked, i am sure when any babe goes nude it's because they want viewers to see them fully naked.

I am pretty sure that many of us are equally as frustrated as you about the camerawork at Babestation. But unfortunately unless the management changed hands I don't foresee the camerawork changing either. The motto of this particular manager seems to be "no one gets anything for free". So despite the fact that viewers are paying for their calls to the girls he still seems to object to the rest of the general public being given exciting shows for free: Ergo the deliberate crap camerawork.

ETA: that is the sad mentality of this regime... They would rather throw food in the bin than give it to starving children unless they have the funds to purchase.

Morgan,PLEASE come back to Babestation nights as you are one shaggable horny babe! You are wasted on the day time slot. I'm sure many viewers would agree with me,too.

yeah, why do the cameramen on all the babestation channels always seem to film the girls who are naked from the waist up? they seem to do it a lot lately and i find it annoying and irritating. i thought babestation was an adult tv station, not a day time programme. please babestation bosses, don't take us viewers for idiots and show us more full nudity, top as well as bottom half and not focusing mostly on the top half when they are naked, i am sure when any babe goes nude it's because they want viewers to see them fully naked.

mrmann wrote:10:26pm and she's already buck naked!

This perv cam crap might actually be a good idea... The women seem more excited by it. Camera dudes are a little too cautious though.

Although you made your post on the Amanda Rendall Thread I feel this needs to be given a more general answer. The majority of the time I am largely in agreement with you, however on this occasion I'm singing from a different hymn sheet. Throughout the course of the night I have seen several sessions being ruined as a consequence of Perv Cam

I've seen Amanda, Lori and Kimberley all take their panties off only for the camera to only focus on their top half. The idea of Perv Cam can work if its done properly but when all the focus is on that and taken off the actual show then it makes for a poor session unfortunately.

darren73 wrote:Oh know

[hidden link - please register]

and babestation is going on shitty too.... damn those channels and those "we taxes even the air you breath" style... fuck off....
Sorry for my language...

Oh know

I actually thought that last night Lori and Kerrie carried the show Pretti, Ashley and Olivia were very disappointing so its no surprise that Lori and Kerrie were the 2 that got most of the air time. Too many at the moment seem to be going off the boil in recent months

Positive wrote:Lori has been away for a while, and I, for one, have missed her. But coming back to perform the way she is doing, in association with this particular producer/cameraman, she may as well have stayed away.

Thankfully her show is much improved in her next stint.

Lori has been away for a while, and I, for one, have missed her. But coming back to perform the way she is doing, in association with this particular producer/cameraman, she may as well have stayed away.

Not one girl on the two main babechannels can be described as good looking let alone beautiful, as some of the viewers of these shows see them as. But I suppose if you see tattoos and rippled breasts as an attraction, then you must be in babe heaven.

And seeing the same faces year after year, all still trying to look like the twenty one year old they once were, makes you feel a little sorry for them. The only place for them to go is that fucking awful oldies site.

I suppose what I'm saying is, is it not time we had a clear out of all the old girls (and most of the younger ones) whose time as come for that long awaited deep clean soak in fake tan remover, and put on the shelf marked "yesterday". And start afresh.

mrmann wrote:Tame one tonight, especially from Kimberly.

Preeti and Roxi look annoyed too.

I often wonder if sometimes on these channels, some of the women are getting shagged or providing favors to the producers behind the scenes, and the other women on screen are either jealous or annoyed that they have to remain clothed until the women/producers return from their "Break".

Probably a rare thing, but I imagine it happens enough.

It that sort of thing doesn't go on from time to time, it would be amazing to say the least.
FFS you get it in a normal working environment, so one that is geared up for nudity and talking about sex!........c'mon

Tame one tonight, especially from Kimberly.

Preeti and Roxi look annoyed too.

I often wonder if sometimes on these channels, some of the women are getting shagged or providing favors to the producers behind the scenes, and the other women on screen are either jealous or annoyed that they have to remain clothed until the women/producers return from their "Break".

Probably a rare thing, but I imagine it happens enough.

When i think of all the good girls that have been tried an fucked off after a couple of sessions, i have to be pissed off. But when i see some of the old has beens that have been brought in, that just sums up adult babechannels.
If a casting couch method isn't still in play at these studios then I will be so surprised.