| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
Yes and on all the SKY channels we are being presented with an onscreen message saying RX Loss. Hope it's only technical and nothing to do with ofcunt
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same for the tv channels, just a black screen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Streams down since half an hour ago
 
|
|
|
|
|
i remember in its elite days when this channel was the cream of the crop.
now its becoming proper shit. |
|
|
|
|
Scottishbloke wrote:I remember 5 years ago when the competition between Babestation and Studio66 or Elite as it was known back then was neck in neck. Now the gulf between the 2 channels is massive, it's light years apart. You've gone and said it now, I hope it doesn't come back to bite you! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I remember 5 years ago when the competition between Babestation and Studio66 or Elite as it was known back then was neck in neck. Now the gulf between the 2 channels is massive, it's light years apart.
The other week for example we had on Babestation Danni and Lucy going at it like 2 horny rabbits, Meanwhile over on Studio66 we had 2 girls sitting in the same room together with as much interaction and chemistry as what you'd expect to see from 2 strangers at a bus stop This once proud channel is no more, it's merely an empty shell going through the motions, it's needs new producers and drastic surgery to make it a force again. PS - Thank fuck this forum doesn't have Rammyrascal on it to defend Studio66
|
|
|
|
|
Regarding "new" girls, S66 don't audition them anymore, just let them work on xpanded for a few weeks then hire them. Then send them back it seems, given that Alicia / Elley has returned and neither Koutney nor Candy have been seen much on S66.
All the channels are a mess though. S66 is losing girls and has nowhere near the quality it did as Elite. RLC is downsizing and sometimes now has 2 girls for 3 channels. Xpanded and Storm are feeder channels for the others, and LoriStation hires most of the best girls then makes them all share a channel while Lori spends all night on the mic. |
|
|
|
|
|
Without knowing their pay structure, it's obvious to me that for what they have to do during the day, they're getting enough money to keep them happy.
It seems to me that during the night there are long periods without calls and if they're paid "piece-work" in some way, maybe their night-time earnings don't compensate for the disruption to their lives; stops them partying, boredom etc and that's before you consider what it'll do to their complexions! Censorship has probably reduced the number of people prepared to pay the extra rates to call at night. So unless the number of day calls drops and they have to risk upping the ante during the night, this is the way it'll keep going. I've never understood what people talk about during the day anyway as I've heard that "no sex" is allowed. Seems to defeat the object somewhat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As far as the daytime roster is concerned Studio 66 is getting stronger every week, with the addition of many new models such as Tiffany, Stacey, Rosie and Antonia I would go as far as saying that the daytime quality is as good as the old Elite days if not better. In fact most of the times we are spoilt for choice during daytime.
What completely baffles me is why the same is not happening for the night time section, given that it is supposed to be the main earner for this channel. I for one would be very happy to see new (as in never before seen on any channel) girls in the night section. If somebody tells me that there aren't many girls willing to do that, I would not believe it, after all with the current level of censorship, they only have to go topless so many girls would be willing to do that I am sure. New girls also means lower wages, so why on earth the boss at Studio 66 does not take that option, is pretty unfathomable. Does any one have any explanation / conjecture on what I said above? |
|
|
|
|
|
... and today on our screens - the gorgeous "Berky Robers"
[hidden link - please register] must be some kind of a strange running gag I guess. As long as they're not using "Fro..y" for Rachel they should be "save", because she really hates that 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ladies and Gentlemen (... and I don't think there are many Ladies here ;-),
we have a winner! TV-Version is still unchanged and I don't expect that it will be corrected very soon, because it took them almost five hours last week to figure out that something could be wrong with "Berky Roberts" Sometimes I just wonder... |
|
|
|
|
|
Dackel0401 wrote:How about a surely not to challenging sunday afternoon brain teaser? Let us see who finds the small, but significant error first: Cara Bertt
|
|
|
|
|
|
How about a surely not to challenging sunday afternoon brain teaser? Let us see who finds the small, but significant error first:
[hidden link - please register] One of the members here or the "geniuses" working at Studio 66 and responsible for the TV-Output... |
|
|
|
|
|
Scottishbloke wrote:quiquems wrote:Harry Amelia was sacked by XtremeFilth, not Studio66, [hidden link - please register] |
|
|
|
|
|
quiquems wrote:Harry Amelia was sacked by XtremeFilth, not Studio66, Quiquems I don't buy into the logic that S66, Xtreme filth and Golden Girls are all separate companies. The other night we had a 2 for 1 between one of the babes from S66 and the other one was from Xtreme. I've gone into great detail on this on the other forum where opinion is split right down the middle on this issue. All I'll say is could you imagine Babestation having a 2 for 1 with a girl from RLC, that's how bizarre I find the 3 channel claim to be. It doesn't add up. The other night on SKY we had 912, 940, 941 and 942 all showing S66. I find it very strange to me why another company would drum up business for it's competitors. Also they all share the same roof and sets and even the same girls it would now appear
|
|
|
