Eurotic TV - General Discussion

I also have the screen in black (Astra)

Buccaneer wrote:

littlebox wrote:on astra black screen :(why?

Have you already checked if your terminals are all properly seated?
I had the error sometimes even.The antenna plug was loose.

I see the other channel on astra no etv

Buccaneer wrote:

littlebox wrote:on astra black screen :(why?

Have you already checked if your terminals are all properly seated?
I had the error sometimes even.The antenna plug was loose.

I have black screen, too. Hotbird is working.

littlebox wrote:on astra black screen :(why?

Have you already checked if your terminals are all properly seated?
I had the error sometimes even.The antenna plug was loose.

on astra black screen :(why?

Siegfried wrote:

However, I remind you that the market is not defined by the offer of a good or a service, but by demand. If all stop here to contact ETV, they'll make a decision and bow to the market, as happened in 2010. If you keep giving them money they will never understand and never learn a good lesson. "The customer is always right".
You decide, but if you choose to continue to fund ETV, then you don't complain of the results.

I agree now with Lucifer.
When ETV had run in with censor and was fined they decided to continue on with soft version.
Obviously they could not know whether enough customer would stay with them to fund the show in the new soft format.
Alas enough has stayed who ring and SMS so show survives.
ETV may have gone hotter in 2010 to bow to pressure but they never will again unless they want another big fine and probably lose licence.
So I have a look at the channel many nights but don't stay for long since it is a pale shadow of what it once was unless you are foot fetishist of course.

Question solved easy. The channel must be encoded, but left open.I know many of these channels.

< snip >
However, I remind you that the market is not defined by the offer of a good or a service, but by demand. If all stop here to contact ETV, they'll make a decision and bow to the market, as happened in 2010. If you keep giving them money they will never understand and never learn a good lesson. "The customer is always right".
You decide, but if you choose to continue to fund ETV, then you don't complain of the results.

I agree now with Lucifer.
When ETV had run in with censor and was fined they decided to continue on with soft version.
Obviously they could not know whether enough customer would stay with them to fund the show in the new soft format.
Alas enough has stayed who ring and SMS so show survives.
ETV may have gone hotter in 2010 to bow to pressure but they never will again unless they want another big fine and probably lose licence.
So I have a look at the channel many nights but don't stay for long since it is a pale shadow of what it once was unless you are foot fetishist of course.

lucifer70 wrote:

HvB wrote:Oh luci, please ... I like your conclusions, but as usual they are vastely based on your assumptions.
You know why Scarlet is on web only (or hve you at lest read the topics hinting to the reason)? No, you assume.
You know about Gias payment? No, you assume.
I could go on like that, but whatfor?
In the end it's only that your conclusions are purely based on what you assume to be and not on what is.
But you have the chance: you can test your assumptions by simply asking Gia or Scarlet.

Probably, who knows, but ETV is not Mercedes or Audi, ETV is a little satellite channel is having a bad time of crisis. ETV is not mystical and mysterious and, after all these years, everyone can understand what they think and, most of all, want.
What you assume (and here you assume too) is the source of my creativity is evident right before your eyes, just look. You have the chance to do it.
It isn't important to read the payroll of Gia or examine the Scarlet's life.
The problem is not the models, so not Gia or Scarlet or any other model and their choices which don't concern us.
The problem, the real problem, is the choices of ETV and its wrong attitude towards clients and viewers, Gia and Scarlett are only examples I used to explain my thought and I don't care what they think about, they don't run ETV they only work there.

Bye

If you know the status of a company and the reasons for the decissions they take by just looking, you should be very successful at the stock market.

HvB wrote:Oh luci, please ... I like your conclusions, but as usual they are vastely based on your assumptions.
You know why Scarlet is on web only (or hve you at lest read the topics hinting to the reason)? No, you assume.
You know about Gias payment? No, you assume.
I could go on like that, but whatfor?
In the end it's only that your conclusions are purely based on what you assume to be and not on what is.
But you have the chance: you can test your assumptions by simply asking Gia or Scarlet.

Probably, who knows, but ETV is not Mercedes or Audi, ETV is a little satellite channel is having a bad time of crisis. ETV is not mystical and mysterious and, after all these years, everyone can understand what they think and, most of all, want.
What you assume (and here you assume too) is the source of my creativity is evident right before your eyes, just look. You have the chance to do it.
It isn't important to read the payroll of Gia or examine the Scarlet's life.
The problem is not the models, so not Gia or Scarlet or any other model and their choices which don't concern us.
The problem, the real problem, is the choices of ETV and its wrong attitude towards clients and viewers, Gia and Scarlett are only examples I used to explain my thought and I don't care what they think about, they don't run ETV they only work there.

Bye

Watcher wrote:

lucifer70 wrote:< snip >
However, I remind you that the market is not defined by the offer of a good or a service, but by demand. If all stop here to contact ETV, they'll make a decision and bow to the market, as happened in 2010. If you keep giving them money they will never understand and never learn a good lesson. "The customer is always right".
You decide, but if you choose to continue to fund ETV, then you don't complain of the results.

I do hate it when someone tells me what I should or should not watch.

The point you raise here is generally a valid one ... but, sadly, you do not seem to understand it .
It is, in fact, what you are observing.
"The customer is always right".
The customer likes the show.
The customer spends his money thereby supporting ETV.

The customers have decided. They fund the shows they like and have no need to complain.

I'm sorry, but where are the satisfied customers?
Last night, Saturday night, with eight (Naomi was added at the "last" moment) beautiful models (that in their intentions were to balance a disastrous week) we saw a bleak, ridicolous and sad show, with very few customers.
The comments about the show on the web are negative. So I still wonder where satisfied customers are? About what they are satisfied because in the show (all hours) absolutely nothing happens??
But the fact is that customers are slowly but steadily disappearing.
I say: if you want to point out that some shows are better than others then you have to punish the bad (virtually all) and reward the best (if they exist). But until then, to go on to pay for nothing and then to keep on grumbling it's usefull (they don't read this forum - any forum - and they don't read customer's mails cause they don't care what clients think) so nothing will change here.
They're accustomed to act and expect that customers, like good lemmings, adapt to their choices, while in "normal" world is the opposite, is the customer to determine the offer. If we want good nightshows, well let's them understand it.
The only way to be heard by ETV is to touch the only thing that they give value ... money!! (In 2010 they stopped the show on the web as very few clients were looking at them, while nightshows were virtually deserted).
They now said: "no money, no funny", but, I repeat, it works the other way too, "no funny, no money".
Regards.

camilo wrote:I am still missing the old times...
with the good music and when the moderators answered to most messages.
and of course the nice girls, some showed more some less and it was ok.
.....but what they are offering today is still disappointing. every time time the same models
who bore me to death with their childish speeches and answers.( in first place angelina and
mashiara)

Hope is still alive...

have a nice day
camilo

now we are near to summer period and maybe models turn for a vacancy and for that there are (i think) the same models per show morning,daytime or nightshow but for me isn't boring in my opinion

Hi,
Top-Models leave ETV or we can see them only in a internet show (PAY-Show !). I don´t like this developement.
This week ETV presents us Lilian in the space of 7 days at 5 times (7 shifts - today even at 2 times !!).
This is simple horrible and a mockery for all the many viewers, what like to see a good erotic show. It isn´t new, that ETV is actuating a self-destruction, but it can´t be the way.
My opinion: To complete the shift´s with worse models - like Lilian - is not the way of a good Erotic channel (it´s simple, but not expertly). So, i hope, that we can see really good performed NEW models (like Jade, Olivia...) often on the screen and Lilian will become a long "creativ-break".

I am still missing the old times...
with the good music and when the moderators answered to most messages.
and of course the nice girls, some showed more some less and it was ok.
.....but what they are offering today is still disappointing. every time time the same models
who bore me to death with their childish speeches and answers.( in first place angelina and
mashiara)

Hope is still alive...

have a nice day
camilo

schubert wrote:Maybe a stupid question !

When the SMSs and calling get cheaper at the 1st of July , Who will be the winner .

I talk about mobile . That´s in the whole EU.

Greetings sch...

What has the reduced fee for roaming to do with anything connected to etv?

Maybe a stupid question !

When the SMSs and calling get cheaper at the 1st of July , Who will be the winner .

I talk about mobile . That´s in the whole EU.

Greetings sch...