| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
You have a strange idea about the perfection.....bah.
|
|
|
|
|
Scottishbloke wrote:Thats a bit uncalled for megonehad I agree. Angelina is perfect. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GeorgeSK wrote:kennyboy2012 wrote:but I would agree that ETV is moving more to web based and less TV, and this is logical, with the majority of viewers able to access the internet, its a more usable medium and much cheaper to use than to partner with TV companies, pay license fees etc. Hi Guys. Vimeo and Youtube can we watch for free, and this is why they have success. Netflix cost about12 € for the Premium Package for New Series and Movies from Hollywood whose production cost millions. How many people will watch Vimeo or Youtube when they say we want to earn more money and its not longer free, we want 29,99 € monthly. I think they find not so many people willing to pay. Or Netflix says, for 12€ you can watch one Series and for all other stuff you must pay again (Thats is what ETV offer as unlimed access). Thats the future of TV in the internet? Paying for everything? I hope not! ETV is currently boring and unimaginative (old ideas to sell as new is silly - Wish for free for 2 hours). Fussion and Split-Cam, Close encounters, morning and afternoon Shows are not worth one Cent. Sometimes Exclusive Energy Mix is good, but who go to a Cinema and sit there for 6 hours to watch a 90 minutes Movie (Thats a Exclusive Show) I dont have so much time. Glad for all have so much time. And before somebody will ask, if I can have a say. I watch over 3 years ETV on TV, I watched 380 Shows live on the Website (Exclusive and Premium) and bought more than 800 Shows at the Video section. And I give every new Idea a Chance, but I found nothing in the last months, worth to give a second chance. ETV on TV is without competition. ETV only on the Internet without prospect of success. Only my opinion. Is this a discussion worth? So usefull as discuss with my 13 years old niece that Justin Bieber is crap. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading posts, i can agree in a part with every single one, with kenny, with scottish, with Born and so on...my idea is that Etv is changed maybe one day will be back as before, but now is a new different channel, in tv for the moment only topless (maybe tomorrow full dressed), in the web/pay full naked (exclusive and every else name the show has, is the same content) and no more hot view that are absolutely censored and forbidden, so everyone can choose what he likes and what not, what spend for and what not. Personally i don't like others channels, with plastic lips and boobs and use of dildos, and etv was the perfect match for my taste, now the new strategy is a step back, i always said i can pay few credits for a well done show, but at the moment most of the shows are worst (not talking only about naked skin) than every free Ns of 2014/13 and first part of 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fascio wrote:This website is dedicated to erotic TV channels. Eurotic TV died three or four years ago, Eurotic TV has nothing to do with this crap that is on air all days, Eurotic TV was a great channel.  What you watched until 2015 was EtvShow with their models, but in 2016 became EWebShow with their webgirls. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Politically me and Kenny shall never agree on how ETV is run, however on a moral level we will always find some common ground, interesting to note is the difference in the terms compromise as this is what Kenny wrote back on this date when the exclusives were relativelty new.
27th April 2015 kennyboy2012 wrote:I see some don't like the exclusives, but I have to disagree. I only watch for the exclusives. To this hm..............  kennyboy2012 wrote:To call them as 7 exclusive nights, they are just as much FTA nights as exclusive nights, but in reality, they are neither, they are a compromise that will not satisfy either group of viewers. The FTA crows will complain that they cant see nude for free, and the exclusive crowd will argue that the shows cant properly do exclusives, so neither group is happy. Amazing how much ETV have shifted the goalposts backed up from Kenny's statement, they look like they are straight from the horses mouth, are these Kennys words or ETV's I wonder as the opininions are very similar. You are still calling this a compromise, well if statement A is a compromise what does that make your latest one. Answers on a postcard please
|
|
|
|
|
|
kennyboy2012 wrote:but I would agree that ETV is moving more to web based and less TV, and this is logical, with the majority of viewers able to access the internet, its a more usable medium and much cheaper to use than to partner with TV companies, pay license fees etc. Hi Kenny, I am using Youtube and Vimeo for general stuff and Netflix for TV series and movies, so in this you are right, I watch less and less regular TV. In fact, I only watch ETV and some news channels live on TV. There are too much adverts on normal commercial channels, even on public channels in my country. But I would like to point out one thing - Youtube is almost synonymous with online amateur video, so is Vimeo and Netflix is nearing penetration in 200 countries and territories. And as I said before many times - Youtube, Vimeo and Netflix are there as apps on every smart TV, games console and media player (Roku, AppleTV, etc.) On the other hand, who knows abut etvshow.com? Only those people who discovered it by accident on the satellite, like me. There are no advertising campains in normal media for them, no smart TV or games console app, aside of the Roku channel, whose availability is limited to some countries only. Big porn brands like Brazer, wowgirls, Playboy, Hustler are much more known than ETV. So it will be an uphill struggle for ETV. Good luck to them. And they will lose their old TV audiences also, as especially in Italyand elswhere where the net coveage is still not good enough in rural areas. |
|
|
|
|
|
@ ETV BOSS
Why Gamblers Never win ? |
|
|
|
meeresbucht wrote:--- Everything I have said is fact, nudity is available, you just have to pay for it, and eroticism is a totally personal viewpoint and judging by how many messages they get, its still there. These two statements are indisputable but I would agree that ETV is moving more to web based and less TV, and this is logical, with the majority of viewers able to access the internet, its a more usable medium and much cheaper to use than to partner with TV companies, pay license fees etc. Web TV is a big market now, the amount of people that I know that watch all TV through the internet is growing fast, and will continue to grow and ETV know this. |
|
|
|
|
kennyboy2012 wrote:fascio wrote:This website is dedicated to erotic TV channels. --- Hi Kennyboy2012 - You big "TV-Liveshow-Expert", Since the beginning of 2016 in FTA E-TV you only can see hot shows behind a curtain or a little bit on a screen in the background of the studio and may be still for a few days - if the model want - in one left after-hour Mo-Fr. So also for me, the time of hot TV-Liveshow as it was in the last 11 years in steady fewer dimension with watch-able fully nude models is gone. If you want to misuse words its your choice. You may also say apple to a peach or bed to a chair. But original E-TV now is the soft advertiser of E.com, for former E-TV-viewers downturning. So long -- |
|
|
|
|
fascio wrote:This website is dedicated to erotic TV channels. Actually, you are quite clearly wrong in your statement: Eurotic tv now does not broadcast nudity or erotic contents. it does offer nudity, you just need to pay for it. Not to pay is your choice, but it is offered erotic contents: Definition of erotic in English: adjective Relating to or tending to arouse sexual desire or excitement so whether its erotic or not, is a personal viewpoint, and quite clearly, judging by the number of messages and requests, it is indeed erotic for some. Maybe not for you , but for others it is. I propose that, based on your words, if you don't think ETV deserves to be here, then logically you will have no desire or need to post on this particular forum, as you will have no interest in the subject of this forum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
kennyboy2012 wrote:I agree with ScottishBloke A quote I never expected to read! Now if Scottishbloke writes back "I agree with kennyboy2012" my head will probably explode! |
|
|
|
Scottishbloke wrote:Thats a bit uncalled for megonehad I agree with ScottishBloke, I like Angelina the way she is. All woman have different breasts of different shapes and sizes, and we all have different tastes. So a good variety is ideal. but as to insulting a girl because she is natural and doesn't conform to your personal tastes, is a bit out of order and your comment is quite offensive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
fascio wrote:This website is dedicated to erotic TV channels. If you did that with this channel, who are showing free to air topless and arse, then you would have to do the same with every other free to air adult channel listed on this forum. I can not find a single one broadcasting full frontal nudity on free to air TV. Please, someone help me and reply with a list of channels I can watch showing pussy as standard, not oops moments, to fool the regulators, but openly full nude, who I can call and chat with the nude girls. |
|
|
|
|
This website is dedicated to erotic TV channels.
Eurotic tv now does not broadcast nudity or erotic contents. Therefore there is no more sense for his presence among the themes of this site and this forum. I propose that Eurotic tv is transferred in the section dedicated to former erotic tv channels. |
|
|
|
