| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
Probably it falls to some models lighter to itself during a web show in the nude to point than during a night show.
Otherwise I also have no explanation of the strange morality of some models. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
15102004 wrote:just to make an example: iirc Jessica was only on webstream topless while e.g. Ira was fta without panties (no idea about her webshows). it would be helpful if someone who divides etv models in different classes would give an explanation for this instead of doing it without any explanation or posting about mysterious lists which should be thrown into the garbage anyway. stanislavskji wrote:I wonder if Karry, so determined to hide her body in free tv shows, is pride to be now present on youporn for free... not only youporn. but this is a topic that should be solved by the etv bosses and not by single models. but sadly is acting a weak point for the lazy and autocratic etv bosses. 
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if Karry, so determined to hide her body in free tv shows, is pride to be now present on youporn for free...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outside wrote:The matter is the massive hypocrisy from some models. Which other models except Karry are you thinking of ? Karry is a special case, pretty hard to figure out what's going on in her pretty little head... Call it hypocrisy or what you want, I'm glad about every model who gets naked at all....either on TV or webshows. What bothers me more is my overall impression that webshows too are getting softer and softer from month to month, with very few exceptions. Edit: If it should be the policy in the future (naked on web, not naked on TV) I wouldn't be very pleased too, but at this moment I don't see this as a pattern of behaviour. |
|
|
|
|
|
Joker1305 wrote:outside wrote:...I don't deny that's Karry's weak point, but somehow my impression is she is mostly blamed for not stripping on the night shows, not for her sometimes hypocrite speeches. My opinion. When i blamed her has been for her hypocrite and horrible speeches, because her megalomania and incongruity with herself (doing the next day what she definitely refused the day before) because her insulting passivity on night shows, not because she has decided not stripping. It is my humble point of view. |
|
|
|
|
|
Joker1305 wrote:15102004 wrote:TV shows are still alive, and aren't absolutely for free for who want make request or speak with models...Yes, but watching is for free. And talking to a girl or sending an SMS can also have other topics than asking for a strip, and with Karry that seems to be successful also without stripping. i'm sorry surely my english is not good enough. Is not the streap "dirty"! playng on the misunderstanding is dirty. just to make an example: Something like Jessyca's behaviour is honest, Karry, Ava, Ira etc... no. |
|
|
|
|
|
outside wrote:...I don't deny that's Karry's weak point, but somehow my impression is she is mostly blamed for not stripping on the night shows, not for her sometimes hypocrite speeches. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
Joker1305 wrote:15102004 wrote:TV shows are still alive, and aren't absolutely for free for who want make request or speak with models...Yes, but watching is for free. And talking to a girl or sending an SMS can also have other topics than asking for a strip, and with Karry that seems to be successful also without stripping. The matter is the massive hypocrisy from some models. No one blames Claudia, or Kristina, or Roshana or Sugar, or April, or Tia, or Angelina, or Nancy, or even Mashiara (I do actually, but for other reasons, no discuss her performance on TV) because they have the same attitude both in TV and in webshows. The same is for other models who don't do fullstrips as Anna. What about that ones who claim they are shy on TV and spread their legs on web, even with balaclavas on their faces? And what about a model who taught a lecture in eroticism without any nudity and at the same time gets nasty and fully naked in webshows? |
|
|
|
|
|
15102004 wrote:TV shows are still alive, and aren't absolutely for free for who want make request or speak with models...Yes, but watching is for free. And talking to a girl or sending an SMS can also have other topics than asking for a strip, and with Karry that seems to be successful also without stripping. Anyway, I don't see why stripping on the web is supposed to be "dirty" while stripping for 10 credits in a night show is not? Both is taking money to attract and to satisfy customers. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
I watched some shows last week and have to say the sunday show was worst of all.
compare to the shows of Alice and Claudia there is a huge difference. For me this chidish behaivor of Karries is not watchable doesn´t matter of her partner. I will not spend any money for webshows anymore unless Kaleya is doing one 
|
|
|
|
|
Engineers have been working hard to make clear a picture on the TV screen but the ETV staff fills smoke into the studio to worsen the picture. Such strange people!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@Slow, i agree with you, yesterday shows were very good. And the models too. One more time, i believe much more in the talent and freedom of the models performing than the scripts. They did a very good job, in my opinion especially in the second show. A good partner is very important, and Mashiara is a good partner to get the best from Karry. Shows like yesterday prove how great "hot model" Karry could be if she was not limited only to the web. But it´s her choice
Good shows yesterday  15102004 wrote:Are the money of TV payers different of yours?Obviously, for ETV, the answer is YES. What can you get for 4 credits in TV? your message on screen, a little comment, but if you ask certain models for a little strip, something hot, the model will refuse it, or maybe hopefully, it´s briefly fulfilled and poorly showed. Finally: a waste of money in comparison with what you get for 4 credits on the web: 60 minutes of one or two models full naked (many times even the newbies or that models who refuse to lose their dresses in tv, you know many examples) for longer time and better production. This is the strategy who has undervalued the night shows and the money from it´s customers. |
|
|
|
|
|
TV shows are still alive, and aren't absolutely for free for who want make request or speak with models, (if etv want to obscure the screen to all "watchers" they may crypt the channel
 ).
|
|
|
|
|
|
15102004 wrote:I don't judge the show, i don't saw, but each model who has a different way to work between SAT and web is "dirty", this is just a scammer's strategy and Carrie is one of them maybe the first one!Well, basically TV is for free, only calls or SMS asking Karry for a full strip are waste of money. In the meantime even the last Karry fan should have noticed for the possibility to see her nude he has to watch a premium show, and considering costs, it's even cheaper than an SMS (OK, maybe she doesn't strip in every show, I don't know). Regards Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
I don't judge the show, i don't saw, but each model who has a different way to work between SAT and web is "dirty", this is just a scammer's strategy and Carrie is one of them maybe the first one!
Are the money of TV payers different of yours? |
|
|
