| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
Well I hope the birthday videos will not be cut, since they say if you watch a live show its your to watch as many times as you wish, not a censored version.
therefore if censored you should be entitled to a refund. now the shows today are suitable for general release without any censorship, they are plainly not erotic. The cameraman destroys the shows, also Jasmine with her closed legs doing the famous Basic Instinct show. She may as well turn her back on the camera and show her ass to us. |
|
|
|
|
|
May I emphasize and focus my distress on the way some our friends make very high expression
and a lot of fake positive comments on the ETV-WALL about every shit performance implemented or executed by ETV. I fully knew that prior to this my opinion, many times has been pointed the finger at this problem but I liked to add my voice and share the concern with my friends in this forum. I don't think you should try to be anything you're not. If you're not smiling all the time or always happy I don't think it matters. If you're having bad day because of poor performance, show you're having an exclamation of disgust or annoyance, don't try to put up something that's fake. This problem and others are the cause or motive that ETV will never make progress, or an event constituting a new stage in a changing condition.  JohnGuitar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for having rectify the date of show.It is 27/11 and not 28/11.
I confused the duration (28 minutes) and the date, sorry!!! Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
matmat67 wrote:The Etv response is proof that a part of the show was deleted.It is the spectacle of the Sellena (28/11) .She knew exactly the camera position.She always gives us great shows.It's ETV who remove a part of the show.Regarding compliance, often ETV destroyed the work of these girls.Ask girls to show off their shoes or their bare feet is also a lack of respect.Girls know that ETV is an erotic site, not a Disney website. Ah, I see. Thanks for the info. I've never bought a Sellena show, unless she's with one of my favourites. I know she is a 'no holds barred' model though, so that would be entirely a management decision to edit the show. Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
[hidden link - please register]
It was on 27, not 28, and yes, Sellena was very aware and we know very well Sellena has not any problem with that shots, and she has proven it many times. It is not because the model, it´s one more self-censorship stupid case again. Deleted about 2 minutes from the original one. I would advise Sellena fans not buying this censored version to punish this sad attitude.Obviously we all free to do whatever, but people should know this version is censored. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Etv response is proof that a part of the show was deleted.It is the spectacle of the Sellena (28/11) .She knew exactly the camera position.She always gives us great shows.It's ETV who remove a part of the show.Regarding compliance, often ETV destroyed the work of these girls.Ask girls to show off their shoes or their bare feet is also a lack of respect.Girls know that ETV is an erotic site, not a Disney website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
matmat67 wrote:I have ask for explanation of ETV concerning a video DPS which was to amputate several minutes!!! I would be very interested to know which show/s and model/s you noticed this in. I've not noticed this happening with the girls I like but they always do 'hot' Premiums so I guess they remain unedited but 'several minutes' sounds extreme to me suggesting maybe the model herself wasn't happy or a caller subsequently informed her how much she had shown and she asked for it to be removed. If it was a newer model on the cusp of 'soft/hot' type shows I would understand to some extent. The employer should always protect the employee, especially if the girl didn't realise where the cameras were, which is often the case with the newer girls. There have been a spate of new girls recently who the viewers have really taken a shine to and it makes perfect sense for ETV to try and nurture them so that they stay, benefitting the shows and, utimately, the profits of ETV. The fleeting appearances of some recent, new, very nice models and their subsequent disappearance is testament to that. I can understand your frustrations though. Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
Older videos are cheaper / after a certain time or outdated /.
 Latest videos / adjusted generally self-censorship / have the original value. Charm of the original is that it has not adjusted the pieces. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
matmat67 wrote:I have ask for explanation of ETV concerning a video DPS which was to amputate several minutes!!! i find this reply from ETV very interesting. They admit their "liability" on censorship, so they manipulate the videos they put for selling with some censorship amputations comparing with the live ones. Then, why they charge in the same way? Then the show should be cheaper than the original one, and they should inform the show has been edited and it´s not the same than the live show to be (at least a little bit) honest with the customer who pays for the show. |
|
|
|
|
|
matmat67 wrote:I have ask for explanation of ETV concerning a video DPS which was to amputate several minutes!!! in germany you can buy every law with and without comments. the version without comment is usuless for everyone except a few advocats and all others should read the version with comments. as you wanna discuss censorship and your assumed rights for hotter shows I'd expect that you know the molvanian laws but have you read the pure law or the comments, too? btw: no company must act at the limits of laws and so etv's acting cannot be called censorship but company strategy. if you want Adidas shoes with 4 stripes you could complain until the hell freezes but you wouldn't get a pair. |
|
|
|
bigalathome wrote:hey Guys, Am I the only one with No Sound on the Internet?? All OK."liveshow-tv.com/en/Live-Streams" and "etvshow.com/index.php?action=sms".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have ask for explanation of ETV concerning a video DPS which was to amputate several minutes!!!
Here is answer... While we understand your frustration, there is not much we can do. Unfortunately we are liable on censorship and we can knowingly release the scenes you are talking about. When they happen live it's accident but releasing the record of it will not. So we only follow rules. Here is my answer... I like to know what are the rules of censure on ETV.Is that censorship imposed by a pseudo higher authority?ETV sets the rules?For night shows I understand,the shows are free and open to all!!!But for shows on the internet I do not agree!!!The shows are broadcast in a strictly private setting.The shows are pay and membership is required for access.No external rules to manage censorship!!!I remind you that you produce adult entertainment.Your customers are major and vaccinate people!!!You do not do shows for children.Censorship on the site is to be banned, simply.I ask no porn, but shows without censure.Some of the latest DPS are deadly dull,more boring than NS and without interest.I want a clear and precise response from you,concerning censorship, of course. I wait for answer??? |
|
|
|
malmaisons wrote:As far as I know there are no package discounts for exclusives so far - so when Lara does her usual dozen during her daytime shows this means 12 credits, right? Seems to be an offer for hardcore fanboys... I checked the amount of money I spend on credits last month and I see the same amount for a full year description on a porn channel. However porn is also boring after a while. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I know there are no package discounts for exclusives so far - so when Lara does her usual dozen during her daytime shows this means 12 credits, right? Seems to be an offer for hardcore fanboys...
If they would offer 5 for the price of 3 ... or 10 for 5 credits ... maybe I would try (sometimes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
shagshaggy wrote:Well if your internet froze any time during the two shows I watched to day it would be a blessing. Alice also Sandra if you watch any tomorrow you can tell me .but Tara and Kelly and Kiara have shows. I think it's 'back to normal' this week.  Whoever was behind the cameras for last week's very good DPS is no longer doing them. The girls don't seem to be having as much fun, the shows are not filmed as well and the same lacklustre ideas have returned. There has been some nice interaction between the girls but it is a little forced and unnatural, the relaxed and very sexy 'flow' from last week's shows has been replaced by the usual constant instruction and direction, so the girls don't appear to be having any personal input, just following orders. I don't know this for certain of course, but the girls I know really well, I can tell from their actions, reactions and the way they keep looking behind the cameras. I think Eli and Angelina are back. Dreamlander |
|
|
