| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
Thunderlips wrote:Slowfox wrote:hmmm... that really makes me scratch my head. What category do you belong to then ? If ETV is not so important for you: Why is it so important for you to write all this nonsense here in Forum? 
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:tunturi wrote:Vulgar, is not funny. [hidden image - please register] tunturi, don't worry, it's fun, I love to joke around with the kids. Slowfox, I hear you heatedly, what is it? In my previous post, there are clear references to none. You talk of viewers of ETV and other persons, who the hell are you? Their lawyer? Their union representative? Or I shot some judgment and you felt caught out with the hands in the cookie jar? ps: 5 minutes is just a way to say that the show will follow it briefly because it makes me bored fast. Or do I have to explain everything as children? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
tunturi wrote:Vulgar, is not funny. I fully agree. Indeed it is vulgar, what some write about their fellow ETV viewers as well as forum members and their opinion about others. You can have an opinion, no doubt, but being rude and insulting towards people, as can be read below, is going too far. Each his own and there is no reason to mock on people and basically call them stupid only because of another attitude, view or liking they may have. My humble opinion and thus the reaction. |
|
|
|
|
Vulgar, is not funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:hmmm... that really makes me scratch my head. What category do you belong to then ? I belong to the category of those who come on the TV, watching ETV 5 minutes, think "usual crap", turn off the TV wishing dysentery to the direction of the channel and to the sitting duck. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thunderlips wrote:Dear Slowfox, you must know that the viewers of ETV there are three different categories of persons identifiable as sitting duck. hmmm... that really makes me scratch my head. What category do you belong to then ? the style of your writring though reminds me of an old, now lost friend who also tended to be pretty cynical |
|
|
|
|
Dear Slowfox, you must know that the viewers of ETV there are three different categories of persons identifiable as sitting duck.
- In third place there is the '' exclusive sitting duck ". He is characterized by an insane and inexplicable desire to spend its own sake. Faced with the choice between seeing something free or pay to see it, the "exclusive chicken" pays satisfied. In his passion for Exclusive is driven more by a desire to feel privileged or instinct to deny others what they are paying him rather than from wanting to see a show without interruption. - In second place appears an evolution of the species, a duck that has learned to fly to avoid the spitting of who approaches him, the "easy target sitting duck". - The winner on the podium of dementia rises the "Fundamentalist sitting duck". The chicken in question is driven by a fundamental dichotomy: on one hand the principle of respect for the other, the consider the properties of their favorite model. Tends to avoid keeping a low profile by launching the holy wars usually based on nothing. I think most people have to decide which of the three categories fall, then let's see what makes the most laughter. For posterity will judge. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
What I see below is apparently quite a bunch of people still buying the exclusive shows regardless of quantity and quality. I said it before and I say it again. All you guys must have given your credits for the shows as you perfectly know what is going on there.
And for jonas. Well, he is not really my best friend and he never was, but it is also unfair to hold him responsible for you not getting your share of pussy. If I was him I would burst out in laughter as now he gets what he pays for, rather then financing the Lauren shows for the free riders. |
|
|
|
|
paradise, I share completely your opinion, but what can you do ... some people never learn. Jonas, has already won the "sitting duck of the year 2014", I see that for 2015 is already on its way ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonas, I don't unsterdand all your wishes in exclusive, they can do the same show on TV.
Every nights, many VIP sms from old custumers for a NO exclusive show from a favorite model. Now, wishes on TV have almost stopped or bad showed and censured..  Lots of night exclusive Mix = Lauren exclusive show on their web site. (Last Sunday Lauren 8 VIP SMS and a total of 23 VIP SMS in exclusive) . ( no comment)  The quality of the Stream is a shame and the shows recorded by Etv on their site has the same bad picture, and it cost 4€ ! It's stupid, it could be easy for them to record the show from original source and no from the Stream. It's less expensive to buy 4 porno channels for 6 € monthly (penthouse hd, xxl..) than two Etv exclusive shows ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
shows building blocks
|
|
|
|
jonas wrote:meteorix wrote:Surely you've already seen nude Lauren, Saiqa, Kia and Sellena a lot of times, but believe me, never so, never in the positions they had last night. The show last night was really flirted porn. Jonas is right pixilation was horrible last night and the other night flirted with porn what is your definition of porn no way just almost like the old days |
|
|
|
|
meteorix wrote:Surely you've already seen nude Lauren, Saiqa, Kia and Sellena a lot of times, but believe me, never so, never in the positions they had last night. The show last night was really flirted porn. Like I often wrote: tastes are different. This sunday nightshow - also in exclusive parts - was much worse than other nightshows (for example fantastic last friday nightshow). "flirted porn"? i didn`t see it And pixelation in exclusive killed most of the shows. 2 weeks ago picture quality was much better! |
|
|
|
|
|
Meteorix, as far as I'm concerned, you can continue to watch your exclusive with all other easy targets like you.
Cheers. |
|
|
|
