| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
Yoko's recorded show was as expected , nude but relatively tame. she did her usual levels.
she is still one of their better girls, and is certainly attractive and enjoyable to see naked, but they need something more, they need to add in something that's a bit daring or bold, something to give the show a little edge. nothing against Yoko, but this was more a show of dramatic art and less about erotic art. The camera was clearly looking for interesting angles of her intimates, but there were non, to be honest, it would be worth 2 credits but not 4. not so log ago, the shows were 2 credits for 1 hr and one girl, and 4 credits for 2 girls. todays show is 2 girls so yes for 4 credits, and we know they'll be up for a more bold and revealing show, providing the director doesn't tame it down and ruin it, so ETV, go back to 2 credits for a standard show with 1 girl. If you want to increase the cost, increase the levels, otherwise no. nothing else worth saying really |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETV is yet fully no matter what you produce, it's mainly money.
But now the last must have understood that. |
|
|
|
|
|
andreaparma wrote:Jasmine and a chair.....good capacity of inventing poses and good athletic and flexibility performances.....open legs and doggy even if camera could do betteru r r8.  Camera could do much, much better: [hidden link - please register] Once again a pixel disaster. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jasmine and a chair.....good capacity of inventing poses and good athletic and flexibility performances.....open legs and doggy even if camera could do better
|
|
|
|
|
|
I saw kiara and suzanne and it was very hot.......the day after yoko and samantha was very poor, disney level.....it's like the casino....try again...you'll get more luck
|
|
|
|
andreaparma wrote:Someone of you watched "in the sewing workshop" part 1 starring nickie and rihanna? How it was? Part 2 is scheduled this week and probably has been made on the same day I don't recall seeing it, so either it was poor or I just missed it. looking at the 3 'live' shows, non of them mention messages or calls, so I expect they will be recorded shows, and that's enough for me to just not bother. Jasmine, no interest anymore, the description sounds like one of their arty shitty ideas and jasmine has taken on tia;s attitude, so sod that. Yoko, although I like her usually, the show looks like it just be another arty show. and the Rhianna and Nickie show. as has been said, probably another recorded show straight after the first. ETV seem to think they can just record a whole pile of shows, lame and tame, throw some weird storyline or theme and then we'll all buy them, errr no, after recent weeks, I'm more picky, fed up of crap after crap. decent shows that are genuinely live please, with decent levels, open leg levels , no more censoring crap, the girls should be told, to do their own choice of levels, no restrictions, but at least full nude and some open leg. That's what's needed now. and show description that are genuine are an absolute must. Either tell it how it is, or don't say a word, no more bullshit and no more arty farty nonsense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Someone of you watched "in the sewing workshop" part 1 starring nickie and rihanna? How it was? Part 2 is scheduled this week and probably has been made on the same day
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.Meadow wrote:Whilst I understand your frustration and regardless of whether I agree to your approach suggest you to make yourself familiar with the terms and conditions of the TGE service. Although they said that once purchased you will have unlimited access to the videos bought, the terms are formulated in such a way that there is no legal obligation. They even reserve their right to change, amend their site as they want and like incl. all contents.Well, in the European Union there are some standards which will void several parts of ETVs self invented conditions. Anyway, I doubt there's much left that could be impounded, possibly they don't have all of their old videos, so I'm also afraid it will be waste of time and money. |
|
|
|
|
Regards
Joker[/quote] They are not better than this they are worse. I wrote them a few times an e- mial and ask them about my video,s I bye but i got no answer . This morning I wrote them again and tell them also that they steel my propperty and iff they dont give them back i will start a lawsuit. Thats who they are[/quote] When they first changed their website I too asked the same question regarding already purchased videos and I too got absolutely no response, so don't hold your breath for any kind of result. You should have done what I did each time I bought any videos from them I used a video capture programme and recorded them so I was still able to watch them for as long as the hard drive lasts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whilst I understand your frustration and regardless of whether I agree to your approach suggest you to make yourself familiar with the terms and conditions of the TGE service. Although they said that once purchased you will have unlimited access to the videos bought, the terms are formulated in such a way that there is no legal obligation. They even reserve their right to change, amend their site as they want and like incl. all contents.
I wish you good luck, but a lawsuit won't earn you much more then a shrug of a shoulder of the ETV management. [hidden link - please register] See 'General Conditions' & 'Modification & Prices' It is certainly annoying having been promised something and now being confronted with the odd facts. You can even call them thieves, assholes, and whatever comes to your mind but it won't get you anywhere. |
|
|
|
Joker1305 wrote:kennyboy2012 wrote:...They could be, but unfortunately they aren't better than this. They are not better than this they are worse. I wrote them a few times an e- mial and ask them about my video,s I bye but i got no answer . This morning I wrote them again and tell them also that they steel my propperty and iff they dont give them back i will start a lawsuit. Thats who they are |
|
|
|
|
|
|
kennyboy2012 wrote:...They could be, but unfortunately they aren't better than this. In the end the dishonesty to their customers was the main reason why they crashed with their business and it seems they still don't understand it, they just seem to continue like they did it for more than 10 years. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
HAHAHAHA
continues to throw the money in the toilet |
|
|
|
Wilsonsand wrote:after some days with the public Molly's show trap, they have been forced to admit it: For what its worth, I have just sent this post the etv wall. Assuming its accepted, I wonder what the reply will be? Will they do the right thing or will they try and blag it out. IMHO, I believe that there are those that should be doing the promo work on the etv website and then there are those that have access that shouldn't be allowed. We've all seen the etv wall posts that have replied to customers in a disrespectful and insulting manner, and then suddenly they are taken down without explanation. Clearly there are those that can and do a good job, and there are those that don't have a clue and maybe should stick to what they are good at (if there is anything) shameful misrepresentation of a product, this is really poor. Basically lying about a recording to increase sales. All this does is persuade potential customers that show descriptions and mages may have nothing to do with the show that they are thinking of buying, and the result is increased mistrust. How can we now know if a show is worth watching or not if we cant believe what is written and the images that are shown. The only way forward should be an apology to anyone that was fooled into buying the show and a full refund. ETV need to realise that, when you lie to the customers, the customers will stop believing you, and then how are you to try and sell your product if no one believes what you say. Come on etv, you are better than this! WK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
after some days with the public Molly's show trap, they have been forced to admit it:
"The topless photos of Molly are taken after the show for the viewer who requested the show. Molly is not topless during the show" this is very welcome after some viewers fell into the trap, right? well, the photos were made for the viewer who requested the show and you make public some of them for free. They explain it on the lounge: "ETV Team: There were viewers who complained that the poster for Molly's show is toples, but she is not topless in the show. We want to remind that Molly is not showing her breasts neither in a show, nor in a photosession. This is an exeption only for photosession purchased by a viewer - friend of her, who reserved the show. The photos were taken after the show. We used some of them for the poster because they look good, they are bold and because after all that is the only way to see Molly topless." This is the proof how they treat their customers: lying them, and their models: betraying them. What a good reason: they look good, they are bold and this is the only way to see her topless. Gold medal at shamelessness. |
|
|
