| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:pepe84 wrote:It is not the problem that they dont drop their pants . . . . but it is a slap in the face for the TV-viewers, when Dacota shows everything in the webshows without any problem, but does not fulfill this kind of wishes in the nightshow. It is simply not consequent and not fair to the paying TV-customers. Is the money of TV-viewers not so good as the money of the buyers of webshows? As 'Slowfox' points out above, it would appear that some "paying customers" do not know what they are actually paying for  Oh! And I haven't forgotten ... On 24-09-2014, in 'Eurotic's website and webstream', pepe84 wrote:< snip > I take that your search will take you through all of the ETV models, one by one, in great detail ... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
pepe84 wrote:It is not the problem that they dont drop their pants . . . . but it is a slap in the face for the TV-viewers, when Dacota shows everything in the webshows without any problem, but does not fulfill this kind of wishes in the nightshow. It is simply not consequent and not fair to the paying TV-customers. Is the money of TV-viewers not so good as the money of the buyers of webshows? o.k. understood. however, the TV shows are still for free. So arguing on any difference being made is void, unless you have spent some precious credits for an sms with a request. You may have the right then to be disappointed and you will certainly spend second thoughts the next time, but an sms sent never is, and never was, a guarantee that you precisely get to see what you asked for. With paying it is only guaranteed that the sms is shown on the plasma screen, that is all. I cannot see any comment or complaint from anybody having sent an sms to either Kelly or Dacota here in this thread. So why do you and your fellow only viewers (= none payers) bother yourself so much with this ? You get a show for free, and still you complain you do not get to see something for which you paid nothing ? But then it is a vicious circle. No paying viewers, no show .... and .... no show, no paying viewers, all besides the always present none paying, but always demanding viewers. |
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:giadreamer wrote:...It´s a pity that she don´t hear what the customers want or that the translater is a loser???... It is not the problem that they dont drop their pants . . . . but it is a slap in the face for the TV-viewers, when Dacota shows everything in the webshows without any problem, but does not fulfill this kind of wishes in the nightshow. It is simply not consequent and not fair to the paying TV-customers. Is the money of TV-viewers not so good as the money of the buyers of webshows? If Dacota does not change this, she should better stay out of the nightshows completely, in her own interest, before she gets a subject of hate because of this absurd behaviour. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
giadreamer wrote:...It´s a pity that she don´t hear what the customers want or that the translater is a loser???... Maybe it is an issue with your translater as my translator cannot really translate that word nor does it get the meaning. However, it knows what a loser is. Back in topic, I cannot really see what the issue is. All you guys wanted something new, and now that the 2 girls do not drop their pants within 2 seconds you start to mock already ? I say give them a chance to warm up a little and give them a little comfort rather then immediately start to complain and to condemn them. Dark is not my hair color, but that is no reason to not to have some respect. |
|
|
|
|
Maybe she´s ashamed about the scar over her pussy?
Let´s hope she will be more courageous in one of the next shows- that scar doesn´t disturb me and the rest of her body would be worth to be seen . It´s a pity that she don´t hear what the customers want or that the translater is a loser???... |
|
|
|
|
|
Agree with tunturi;
 where was Dacotas contribution in yesterday night show ? Teasing them and ETV viewers? apart from a catastrophic director - just disappointing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dacota&Kelly
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dacota has the absolute perfect body.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kazimir wrote:c.eifel wrote:more, worth every creditdeepblued wrote:Dacota .... a really shame of this channel .... What she did in a night show ???? Great show for Dacota also last saturday ......... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c.eifel wrote:more, worth every creditdeepblued wrote:Dacota .... a really shame of this channel .... What she did in a night show ???? |
|
|
|
|
deepblued wrote:Dacota .... a really shame of this channel .... What she did in a night show ???? what is she doing? she shows her perfect breasts and her ass in doggystyle? thats fantastic btw what does she show in premium? |
|
|
|
|
|
As long as we are paying our credits for her Daily Premium Shows I suppose there is no need for Dacota nor Kelly to fully undress in the night show.
Let's wait and see what future brings and in the mean time spend some credits for the performance of these attractive models. |
|
|
|
|
|
I agree said you have to buy premium to see her pussy never on night show They need to try someone else on night show
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dacota .... a really shame of this channel .... What she did in a night show ????
|
|
|
