| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
|
|
Congratulations to Dakota for becoming a "Star"
 Whatever this means 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good morning to all. I love Dakota, she's a really wonderfu woman, but gow is her rules ??? The receptionist or the beautiful statue ????
|
|
|
|
|
|
c.eifel wrote:seems that i am the only fan of Dacotas night shows??Probably not. I'd assume many who complain about her actually are attracted by her, only suffering not too see all of her. Anyway, I wouldn't consider myself really as a fan of her, but she looks great and it's good to have her at least now and then in the night shows. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
c.eifel wrote:seems that i am the only fan of Dacotas night shows?? I can ensure you that you are not her only fan  It´s just that everyone gets speechless everytime she´s in studio so they cant write any comment afterwards  In my opinion, she´s one of all time models in ETV-history,
|
|
|
|
|
seems that i am the only fan of Dacotas night shows??
Look at that, thats the absoluty perfect doggy ass.  [hidden link - please register] Download here: [hidden link - please register] |
|
|
|
|
|
Dacota said, she actually likes anal sex
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dakota's lowered underwear and seemed a little early-morning classes.
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dacota reflects what the channel is today..
|
|
|
|
|
|
eigentor wrote:I have watched some of Dakotas nightshows lately and yes, it is a bit disappointing and slow. And I say that even though Hi eigentor. I totally agree with you. I would add only that, in my opinion, to undress giving pleasure  Dacota have to show at least a bit of enthusiasm. Good evening to everyone. Passion |
|
|
|
|
|
I have watched some of Dakotas nightshows lately and yes, it is a bit disappointing and slow. And I say that even though
I like the twins and their sinister style a lot.  But the way they are scheduled, its more like you have the same girl in two shifts per day, and that cant be the point in having twins, can it? I think you have to play the cards you have been dealt. The twins have been dealt the Royal Flush, and that is not a hand you voluntarily fold. They should make use of the advantage that they are twins and perform together. Hey, nobody in his right mind would expect any serious "lesbian" stuff here, but whats wrong with undressing each other a bit in the nightshow, or a nice stripdance together, harmless things like that. I'm sure that would make a lot of weird dudes like myself happy... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
eigentor wrote:Slowfox wrote:...Despite that formal "guarantee", what you really pay for is the expectation that your (reasonable) wish will be fulfilled, right? Basically I exactly said that. But maybe too complicated. Well, you are right in saying once wishes get denied no requests will follow. However, from a legal point of view there is no obligation to follow a request on the plasma but only to show the message. If the message contains a request it is up to the girl to follow this or not. Usually the girls do, however, and that is why everybody not knowing this believes that there is an obligation. But back to the point I was trying to make. Here we have now the people who complain that a girl doesn't follow a request without having given a single credit for any message. I can understand someone being disappointed when having sent a message to which a nice answer is being given, but then is basically ignored or poorly fullfilled. But I cannot understand and have no sympathy for the none paying viewers complaints that the girls don't follow the wishes, and further call them useless and a failure in the nightshows. Those people should at least once in a while consdier that they get a free ride on messages sent by others. And then they still complain ? For me this is a slap in the face of those paying. |
|
|
|
|
|
eigentor wrote:Watcher wrote:...I take that your search will take you through all of the ETV complainers, one by one, in great detail ... No, only the hypocrites ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:...I take that your search will take you through all of the ETV complainers, one by one, in great detail ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:...Despite that formal "guarantee", what you really pay for is the expectation that your (reasonable) wish will be fulfilled, right? Customers that are not happy about the way their requests are handled, will in the end be customers no more. I reckon Etv is very aware of this. |
|
|
|
|
|
pepe84 wrote:If Dacota does not change this, she should better stay out of the nightshows completely, in her own interest, before she gets a subject of hate because of this absurd behaviour.100% disagree. Some of the best and most successful models never really showed it all on TV. They should put more focus on the twin part imho...what can be hotter than twins (good-looking ones) performing. If D&K put on a decent stripping/teasing show on TV together, I will pay.
|
|
|
